Yup. Good analysis GF. I agree 100%.GannonFan wrote:The thing is, it's been an anti incumbent movement going back to 2006 but some people haven't been playing close attention. Back then, the GOP got tossed because they were spending uncontrollably and Bush was weak in the WH. It continued through 2008 as the GOP was seen as the party of the incumbents, and now, as the Dems have pretty much bungled that interpretation and thought they had a huge mandate to do whatever they want, including continuing the spending spree, they look to lose the most this Fall.UNHWildCats wrote: at the rate we are going there may be very few returning members of congress next year. Good thing for those Sens who arent up this year. I think both parties would be wise to challenge their incumbents, because there isnt a anti democrat movement as conks would like u to believe... there is an anti incumbent movement.
It's a shame because Bayh is probably the type of politician we really want in Washington, however, as he admits, the town is almost pandering entirely to the political zealots and both parties have lost the middle ground where typically power resides. Until one party makes a move to claim the middle ground, both parties will be faced with anti-incumbency issues.
Another thing, TERM LIMITS TERM LIMITS TERM LIMITS!
We need more Statesmen and Stateswomen than politicians.







