Too many America-haters on this thread.AZGrizFan wrote:I'll tell you what, you could play FOOTBALL on this thread and not hit a donk. Fuckers have run and hid like never before. Even that neo-donk RobsPics can't even come on and defend this drivel he posted...
Riiiiiiiiiiighhhhht......houndawg wrote:Too many America-haters on this thread.AZGrizFan wrote:I'll tell you what, you could play FOOTBALL on this thread and not hit a donk. Fuckers have run and hid like never before. Even that neo-donk RobsPics can't even come on and defend this drivel he posted...
Two (You and RobsPics) aren't too many...houndawg wrote:Too many America-haters on this thread.AZGrizFan wrote:I'll tell you what, you could play FOOTBALL on this thread and not hit a donk. Fuckers have run and hid like never before. Even that neo-donk RobsPics can't even come on and defend this drivel he posted...
By "American-haters" dawg means "those who haven't drunk the Obama coffee, and who still have their heads ABOVE the sand, rather than firmly planted IN it.".Col Hogan wrote:Two (You and RobsPics) aren't too many...houndawg wrote:
Too many America-haters on this thread.
AZGrizFan wrote:By "American-haters" dawg means "those who haven't drunk the Obama coffee, and who still have their heads ABOVE the sand, rather than firmly planted IN it.".Col Hogan wrote:
Two (You and RobsPics) aren't too many...
Where is the love? Oh, I clearly get his meaning....I just see things from a different point of view...AZGrizFan wrote:By "American-haters" dawg means "those who haven't drunk the Obama coffee, and who still have their heads ABOVE the sand, rather than firmly planted IN it.".Col Hogan wrote:
Two (You and RobsPics) aren't too many...
I'm sitting on that same perch, Colonel.Col Hogan wrote:Oh, I clearly get his meaning....I just see things from a different point of view...AZGrizFan wrote:
By "American-haters" dawg means "those who haven't drunk the Obama coffee, and who still have their heads ABOVE the sand, rather than firmly planted IN it.".
It's amazing how far one can see without one's head firmly impanted in one's own arse!Col Hogan wrote:Oh, I clearly get his meaning....I just see things from a different point of view...AZGrizFan wrote:
By "American-haters" dawg means "those who haven't drunk the Obama coffee, and who still have their heads ABOVE the sand, rather than firmly planted IN it.".
My company was a recipient. WE were ask to quantify the number of jobs saved by the amount of Section 8 Funds in the stimulus ( which of course is normally appropriated in the budget, runs short, and additional funds are allocated) apparently the stimulus was used to cover the normal annual shortfall.Measuring ARRA’s Impact Using Recipients’ Reports 2
Measuring ARRA’s Impact Using Economic Models and Historical Data
Too many things are guilty of that - the Congressional Budget Office for one, and my personal dislike, the GPI.OL FU wrote:I finally skimmed the report and two thing struck me.
My company was a recipient. WE were ask to quantify the number of jobs saved by the amount of Section 8 Funds in the stimulus ( which of course is normally appropriated in the budget, runs short, and additional funds are allocated) apparently the stimulus was used to cover the normal annual shortfall.Measuring ARRA’s Impact Using Recipients’ Reports 2
Measuring ARRA’s Impact Using Economic Models and Historical Data
Economic models. The same models using the same multipliers that justified the bill in the first place.
Garbage in, Garbage out
That seems to be the norm for the donks here... always starting threads they can't finish.AZGrizFan wrote:I'll tell you what, you could play FOOTBALL on this thread and not hit a donk. Fuckers have run and hid like never before. Even that neo-donk RobsPics can't even come on and defend this drivel he posted...
Versus what, the economic policies of cut taxes, spend, then bitch about the deficit? I disagree with Obama's economic philosophy so far, but at least he's spending money as the creditor and employer of last resort.89Hen wrote:That seems to be the norm for the donks here... always starting threads they can't finish.AZGrizFan wrote:I'll tell you what, you could play FOOTBALL on this thread and not hit a donk. Fuckers have run and hid like never before. Even that neo-donk RobsPics can't even come on and defend this drivel he posted...
No can do, compadre.houndawg wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
By "American-haters" dawg means "those who haven't drunk the Obama coffee, and who still have their heads ABOVE the sand, rather than firmly planted IN it.".
Why don't you be part of the solution, Z, instead of part of the problem? A positive attitude can change your whole life.
Stop hating so much and start supporting your commander-in-chief.
C'mon AZ, you've already compromised your principles by drinking Bud Light. Once there, you are capable of anything.AZGrizFan wrote:No can do, compadre.houndawg wrote:
Why don't you be part of the solution, Z, instead of part of the problem? A positive attitude can change your whole life.
Stop hating so much and start supporting your commander-in-chief.
Cluck U wrote:C'mon AZ, you've already compromised your principles by drinking Bud Light. Once there, you are capable of anything.AZGrizFan wrote:
No can do, compadre.
Racist.AZGrizFan wrote:Cluck U wrote:
C'mon AZ, you've already compromised your principles by drinking Bud Light. Once there, you are capable of anything.
Nope.
I'd just as soon drink my own urine than call him Commander in Chief.
Nope, just intelligent.D1B wrote:Racist.AZGrizFan wrote:
Nope.
I'd just as soon drink my own urine than call him Commander in Chief.
Weren't you the same genius who thought Sarah Palin was the best VP candidate ever?AZGrizFan wrote:Nope, just intelligent.D1B wrote:
Racist.
AZGrizFan wrote:Nope, just intelligent.D1B wrote:
Racist.
You mean at MOST he's spending money.kalm wrote:but at least he's spending money
89Hen wrote:You mean at MOST he's spending money.kalm wrote:but at least he's spending money
http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/20 ... /deficits/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;But was Cheney wrong when he airily dismissed the importance of deficits? In the full quotation, as first recounted by Paul O'Neill, Bush's fired Treasury Secretary, he said, "You know, Paul, Reagan proved deficits don't matter. We won the [Congressional] midterms [in November 2002]. This is our due." What he evidently meant -- aside from claiming the spoils -- was that the effects of deficit spending tend to be less dire than predicted. And that insight deserves to be considered if only because all the partisan barking over the projected deficits in the Obama budget is so hysterical -- as if nothing could be worse than more federal spending.
Coming from a numbnuts like you, I take those as compliments.D1B wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
Nope, just intelligent.
Z, you aint intelligent, really. You are petty, egotistical, embarrassed and angry.
You live a very sheltered life if you think there are any conservatives that were happy with Bush's spending.kalm wrote:http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/20 ... /deficits/
Spending only matter when a Democrat is in office - even Dick Cheney knows this.
No shit.89Hen wrote:You live a very sheltered life if you think there are any conservatives that were happy with Bush's spending.kalm wrote:http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/20 ... /deficits/
Spending only matter when a Democrat is in office - even Dick Cheney knows this.
Once again shows the core differences between Cons and Libs. We can say we didn't like many of the Republican prez's policies.... Dems defend every single Clinton action to this day.AZGrizFan wrote:No shit.89Hen wrote: You live a very sheltered life if you think there are any conservatives that were happy with Bush's spending.
