So much for literacy...all UTSA articles pertaining to their football team have said 2013. That's the third year. Though I guess, that may not be as much literacy as it is the ability to count.
did I ask you your opinion? No...go post on AGS
You don't honestly like this forum, have no sense of humor or decorum. You think you're being cutesy when you only come off as an ass. Or you think you need to correct things which have no need of such.
I'm entitled to say whatever the hell I want about UTSA. Persons were all high and mighty about not playing SLC teams etc, because it was beneath them...therefore, my reply is apropo.
During our first two years of play we will not be playing a single FBS opponent."
So much for all that chest thumping
all of the "chest thumping" as you refer to it was in regards to the 2013 and 2014 scheduling, once the team is at the full 85 scholarships. Did you really think they would play FBS schools in 2011-12 with half the team composed of walkons?
Im hoping they schedule as many FCS schools as possible, Division II, D-III, NAIA opponents arent going to get them ready for whats coming in years 3 and 4. I also hope some of these contracts are home and home, would be nice to have some of the same opponents in the first 2 seasons to gauge the progress of the program.
all of the "chest thumping" as you refer to it was in regards to the 2013 and 2014 scheduling, once the team is at the full 85 scholarships. Did you really think they would play FBS schools in 2011-12 with half the team composed of walkons?
Im hoping they schedule as many FCS schools as possible, Division II, D-III, NAIA opponents arent going to get them ready for whats coming in years 3 and 4. I also hope some of these contracts are home and home, would be nice to have some of the same opponents in the first 2 seasons to gauge the progress of the program.
Obviously you haven't been on BCF and witnessed the rhetoric...