CBO: Stimulus Plan Working As Advertised

[AZGrizFan]

No shit.

Once again shows the core differences between Cons and Libs. We can say we didn't like many of the Republican prez's policies.... Dems defend every single Clinton action to this day.

...even his right to get a blowjob from an intern....and how that's magically NOT sexual harassment.

[kalm]

http://www.salon.com/opinion/conason/20 ... /deficits/

Spending only matter when a Democrat is in office - even Dick Cheney knows this.

You live a very sheltered life if you think there are any conservatives that were happy with Bush's spending.

I'm well aware. BTW, when was the last time the Republican party = conservative? Talk is cheap, and cut tax and spenders keep winning Republican nominations.

[89Hen]

cut tax and spenders keep winning Republican nominations.

Like who?

[kalm]

No ****.

Once again shows the core differences between Cons and Libs. We can say we didn't like many of the Republican prez's policies.... Dems defend every single Clinton action to this day.

I'm no Dem and have many issues with the Clinton administration.

[89Hen]

I'm no Dem

You just happen to vote that way.

[kalm]

Once again shows the core differences between Cons and Libs. We can say we didn't like many of the Republican prez's policies.... Dems defend every single Clinton action to this day.

...even his right to get a blowjob from an intern....and how that's magically NOT sexual harassment.

Did Monica accuse him of that?

Lewinsky Cleaners - the kind of place where you can drop your pants and jacket off.

(Oldie but a goodie)

[kalm]

I'm no Dem

You just happen to vote that way.

Sometimes, with many regrets, and far fewer from now on.

[kalm]

cut tax and spenders keep winning Republican nominations.

Like who?

E.G. Bunning. There's many more.

[89Hen]

Like who?

E.G. Bunning. There's many more.

Jim Bunning? You mean the Jim Bunning that's not even running for reelection this year because the Republicans forced him out?

[houndawg]

C'mon AZ, you've already compromised your principles by drinking Bud Light. Once there, you are capable of anything.

Nope.

I'd just as soon drink my own urine than call him Commander in Chief.

I'd just as soon you drink your own urine than call him commander-in-chief too.

[D1B]

Z, you aint intelligent, really. You are petty, egotistical, embarrassed and angry.

Coming from a numbnuts like you, I take those as compliments.

It's OBVIOUS I've gotten completely under your skin.

Sure thing. What ever get you through the day, Z.

[kalm]

E.G. Bunning. There's many more.

Jim Bunning? You mean the Jim Bunning that's not even running for reelection this year because the Republicans forced him out?

Classic example. Voted for the Bush tax cuts, creation of the department of Homeland Security, and war funding. Rhetorically though, he's very, very, very anti-deficit and fiscally conservative.

Do you really think the rest of the tax cut and spend Republicans are forcing him out because he voted for cutting taxes and spending?

[89Hen]

Classic example. Voted for the Bush tax cuts, creation of the department of Homeland Security, and war funding. Rhetorically though, he's very, very, very anti-deficit and fiscally conservative.

Do you really think the rest of the tax cut and spend Republicans are forcing him out because he voted for cutting taxes and spending?

"cut tax and spenders keep winning Republican nominations"

You offer Jim Bunning who is NOT winning a Republican nomination. You also say there are many more... you haven't given one yet.

[AZGrizFan]

Nope.

I'd just as soon drink my own urine than call him Commander in Chief.

I'd just as soon you drink your own urine than call him commander-in-chief too.

Good. Then we're in agreement. He's a douchebag (nothing to the level of Douche1Bag, but well on his way) who couldn't "command" his way out of a wet paper bag.

[houndawg]

I'd just as soon you drink your own urine than call him commander-in-chief too.

Good. Then we're in agreement. He's a douchebag (nothing to the level of Douche1Bag, but well on his way) who couldn't "command" his way out of a wet paper bag.

Not really in agreement, I'd just like to see you drinking piss. Me, I'd call him the CinC instead of drinking piss, even if it were my own piss, bold yet understated, delicately fragrant with hints of blackberry and forest........:

Things do seem a little more under control in Afghanistan than they were under the last CinC.

And we did just take down a big fish in Pakistan with their help.

So even though the current douchebag is pretty much a copy of the previous douchebag, he does seem to be getting at least some results, unlike his predecessor, the Dead-or-Alive, Deserter CinC........

[AZGrizFan]

Good. Then we're in agreement. He's a douchebag (nothing to the level of Douche1Bag, but well on his way) who couldn't "command" his way out of a wet paper bag.

Not really in agreement, I'd just like to see you drinking piss. Me, I'd call him the CinC instead of drinking piss, even if it were my own piss, bold yet understated, delicately fragrant with hints of blackberry and forest........:

Things do seem a little more under control in Afghanistan than they were under the last CinC.

And we did just take down a big fish in Pakistan with their help.

So even though the current douchebag is pretty much a copy of the previous douchebag, he does seem to be getting at least some results, unlike his predecessor, the Dead-or-Alive, Deserter CinC........

Yeah. Ol' Bushy never caught a SINGLE terrorist, did he?

Is it "necessary" for me to drink my own urine? No...but I do it anyway because it's sterile and I like the taste.

[kalm]

Classic example. Voted for the Bush tax cuts, creation of the department of Homeland Security, and war funding. Rhetorically though, he's very, very, very anti-deficit and fiscally conservative.

Do you really think the rest of the tax cut and spend Republicans are forcing him out because he voted for cutting taxes and spending?

"cut tax and spenders keep winning Republican nominations"

You offer Jim Bunning who is NOT winning a Republican nomination. You also say there are many more... you haven't given one yet.

Riiiiiiight, because Bunning hasn't won a nomination before. In fact, nearly every Republican in office has won a nomination.

As for further examples, I guessing there were very few Republicans who didn't vote for the Bush tax cuts and brought unneccessary pork home to the constituents. Christ, right now their bitching about Obama's deficit while attending ribbon cutting ceremonies for stimulus projects.

Both parties do it but some of us recognize that the Repbulicans tend to be a little more hypocritical.

[YoUDeeMan]

When you quote an article that has this line, it loses any credibility:

"Another would be the catastrophic consequences of unchecked climate change, potentially more devastating than a world war"

And this is yet another article that fashionably mentions that our big deficit during WWII was a good thing because it grew the middle class. Yeah, our economy grew at the expense of millions and millions of people's lives and the destruction of all of our competitors.

Say, let's do it again!!!!

Bubble brains...

[89Hen]

Riiiiiiight, because Bunning hasn't won a nomination before. In fact, nearly every Republican in office has won a nomination.

As for further examples, I guessing there were very few Republicans who didn't vote for the Bush tax cuts and brought unneccessary pork home to the constituents. Christ, right now their bitching about Obama's deficit while attending ribbon cutting ceremonies for stimulus projects.

Both parties do it but some of us recognize that the Repbulicans tend to be a little more hypocritical.

Bunning was a two term Senator and was forced out this go round, so he obviously isn't one who "keeps winning Republican nominations". You still haven't provided an example.

[houndawg]

When you quote an article that has this line, it loses any credibility:

"Another would be the catastrophic consequences of unchecked climate change, potentially more devastating than a world war"

And this is yet another article that fashionably mentions that our big deficit during WWII was a good thing because it grew the middle class. Yeah, our economy grew at the expense of millions and millions of people's lives and the destruction of all of our competitors.

Say, let's do it again!!!!

Bubble brains...

Somebody call a social worker and let them know that kalm is abusing a child over here....

[houndawg]

Not really in agreement, I'd just like to see you drinking piss. Me, I'd call him the CinC instead of drinking piss, even if it were my own piss, bold yet understated, delicately fragrant with hints of blackberry and forest........:

Things do seem a little more under control in Afghanistan than they were under the last CinC.

And we did just take down a big fish in Pakistan with their help.

So even though the current douchebag is pretty much a copy of the previous douchebag, he does seem to be getting at least some results, unlike his predecessor, the Dead-or-Alive, Deserter CinC........

Yeah. Ol' Bushy never caught a SINGLE terrorist, did he?

Is it "necessary" for me to drink my own urine? No...but I do it anyway because it's sterile and I like the taste.

Not the one his family has a business relationship with, anyway.

Dead or Alive.

[kalm]

When you quote an article that has this line, it loses any credibility:

"Another would be the catastrophic consequences of unchecked climate change, potentially more devastating than a world war"

And this is yet another article that fashionably mentions that our big deficit during WWII was a good thing because it grew the middle class. Yeah, our economy grew at the expense of millions and millions of people's lives and the destruction of all of our competitors.

Say, let's do it again!!!!

Bubble brains...

I'm trying to decide if this red herring is as stupid as your Haiti analogy.

Take a step, chew the gum...take a step, chew the gum...take a step, chew the gum...

There now you've got it! Good boy.

[YoUDeeMan]

When you quote an article that has this line, it loses any credibility:

"Another would be the catastrophic consequences of unchecked climate change, potentially more devastating than a world war"

And this is yet another article that fashionably mentions that our big deficit during WWII was a good thing because it grew the middle class. Yeah, our economy grew at the expense of millions and millions of people's lives and the destruction of all of our competitors.

Say, let's do it again!!!!

Bubble brains...

Somebody call a social worker and let them know that kalm is abusing a child over here....

Serously, if you believe, as does the author, that running up huge deficits is the way to go, and then using WWII government spending as an example of the success of deficits, then it is you who is the uninformed child. The ONLY reason we dominated the world for three decades was that we were the only industiral country left standing. Easy to produce huge amounts of materials to be sold worldwide when the whole world is forced to buy from us.

Is that hard to understand? Answer the question.

[houndawg]

Somebody call a social worker and let them know that kalm is abusing a child over here....

Serously, if you believe, as does the author, that running up huge deficits is the way to go, and then using WWII government spending as an example of the success of deficits, then it is you who is the uninformed child. The ONLY reason we dominated the world for three decades was that we were the only industiral country left standing. Easy to produce huge amounts of materials to be sold worldwide when the whole world is forced to buy from us.

Is that hard to understand? Answer the question.

No.
Throughout recorded history economies have grown at the expense of lives and by the destruction of competitors. It's the way things have always been done, albeit we have scaled things up considerably......China would be a textbook case of a modern-day example, lots of people dying early from the pollution of coal-fired factories, working hard to destroy their biggest competitor.........and just who the hell are you to contradict Dick Cheney when he says deficits don't matter? Like I'd take the word of a nobody like you over the word of a great American who had enough class to shoot a lawyer.

[89Hen]

I'm trying to decide if this red herring is as stupid as your Haiti analogy.

Take a step, chew the gum...take a step, chew the gum...take a step, chew the gum...

There now you've got it! Good boy.

Your condescending posts are priceless given your inability to back up your wild claims (not to mention your horrible grammar).