
http://www.gallup.com/poll/126929/Slim- ... ssage.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Bandwagon fans.




But I thought the vast majority of Americans were taking up arms to prevent fellow citizens from having health care?Skjellyfetti wrote:It's just one poll and one put out quickly, but I think it's a good sign.

Ahhh. Mr Hyperbole makes an appearance.dbackjon wrote:But I thought the vast majority of Americans were taking up arms to prevent fellow citizens from having health care?


89Hen wrote:Ahhh. Mr Hyperbole makes an appearance.dbackjon wrote:But I thought the vast majority of Americans were taking up arms to prevent fellow citizens from having health care?

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_ ... _care_plan" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Forty-nine percent (49%) of U.S. voters favor their state suing the federal government to fight the requirement in the new national health care plan that every American must obtain health insurance.
A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey of likely voters finds that 37% disagree and oppose their state suing to challenge that requirement. Fourteen percent (14%) are undecided.



According to Z, there are no good signs anymore. The world is ending, and it will happen way before 2012.Skjellyfetti wrote:It's just one poll and one put out quickly, but I think it's a good sign.

Grizalltheway wrote:According to Z, there are no good signs anymore. The world is ending, and it will happen way before 2012.Skjellyfetti wrote:It's just one poll and one put out quickly, but I think it's a good sign.

What percent of the vote did Obama get when he won the election?Skjellyfetti wrote:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/126929/Slim- ... ssage.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Bandwagon fans.


Fifty three %Gil Dobie wrote:What percent of the vote did Obama get when he won the election?Skjellyfetti wrote:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/126929/Slim- ... ssage.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Bandwagon fans.

Well, I look at it kind of like religion: I'd rather believe and be WRONG, than NOT believe and be wrong.Chizzang wrote:Grizalltheway wrote:
According to Z, there are no good signs anymore. The world is ending, and it will happen way before 2012.


No. Just the ones with a brainstem....and we're a pretty rare group.dbackjon wrote:But I thought the vast majority of Americans were taking up arms to prevent fellow citizens from having health care?Skjellyfetti wrote:It's just one poll and one put out quickly, but I think it's a good sign.


AZGrizFan wrote:No. Just the ones with a brainstem....and we're a pretty rare group.dbackjon wrote:
But I thought the vast majority of Americans were taking up arms to prevent fellow citizens from having health care?

Too bad for you. You and Alex are now gonna be on the outside, lookin' in when the balloon goes up pal.dbackjon wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
No. Just the ones with a brainstem....and we're a pretty rare group.
Very rare - and Z, you aren't in it...![]()


Not very clever, jon.dbackjon wrote:But I thought the vast majority of Americans were taking up arms to prevent fellow citizens from having health care?Skjellyfetti wrote:It's just one poll and one put out quickly, but I think it's a good sign.

So, a poll that AGREES with your position is good. A poll that DISPROVES your position is junk.Skjellyfetti wrote:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/126929/Slim- ... ssage.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Bandwagon fans.


What poll did I say was junk? And, I didn't even say this poll was that great, AZ. I also criticized it:AZGrizFan wrote:So, a poll that AGREES with your position is good. A poll that DISPROVES your position is junk.Skjellyfetti wrote:
http://www.gallup.com/poll/126929/Slim- ... ssage.aspx" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Bandwagon fans.
You truly are a piece of work.
Skjellyfetti wrote:It's just one poll and one put out quickly, but I think it's a good sign.

Skjellyfetti wrote:What poll did I say was junk?
by Skjellyfetti » Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:47 pm
Nah, but I don't give a shit about Rasmussen's poll and I don't think Obama or Democrats do either.


I said I didn't give a shit about it... I think that's different than saying it's junk or not credible.89Hen wrote:Skjellyfetti wrote:What poll did I say was junk?by Skjellyfetti » Sun Mar 21, 2010 11:47 pm
Nah, but I don't give a **** about Rasmussen's poll and I don't think Obama or Democrats do either.

Skjellyfetti wrote:I said I didn't give a shit about it... I think that's different than saying it's junk or not credible.89Hen wrote:


So now he's saying it's legit and credible, but still doesn't give a shit about it. I guess that makes him arrogant instead of inconsistent. I'm not sure which is worse, but he done dug himself a big hole today.AZGrizFan wrote:Skjellyfetti wrote:
I said I didn't give a shit about it... I think that's different than saying it's junk or not credible.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You'll make a fine politician.![]()
![]()


Eh, whatever. It makes sense to me. I don't give a shit about a poll done a few days before the bill was signed. I care a lot more about ones done AFTER. Both are equally credible though.89Hen wrote: So now he's saying it's legit and credible, but still doesn't give a **** about it. I guess that makes him arrogant instead of inconsistent. I'm not sure which is worse, but he done dug himself a big hole today.

AZGrizFan wrote:Skjellyfetti wrote:
I said I didn't give a **** about it... I think that's different than saying it's junk or not credible.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You'll make a fine DEMOKRAT politician, skelly.![]()
![]()