It would be different, certainly, if the federal government made it a law. But, that's not what Colonel's analogy (that took us in this bizarre tangent) orignally was:FargoBison wrote:That doesn't involve the federal government, if the federal government made this decision we would be having the same discussion in regards to its constitutionality as we are having with health care.Skjellyfetti wrote:
Yup, looks like you're right. And they provide exceptions including those that can't afford. So, I certainly think it's Constitutional.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 36862.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Do you, Col.?
It would be fine for a town to do this with guns, imo.So if one can be fined for failing to purchase something (in this case, health insurance), then I assume a state or city could legally tax/fine a citizen for failing to purchase something like....say...a gun...if the legislature so chose...and that would be Constitutionally sound in your opinion...
It would not be Constitutionally sound for a town to force everyone to attend the First Baptist Church every Sunday.
If the town isn't taking away someone's Constitutional right... it's fine. Forcing people to own guns = ok. Forcing people to attend church = not ok.




