Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
- BlackFalkin
- Level3
- Posts: 3865
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
- I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
- Location: Southern California
Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
Let me break it dow for yall. i played for ewu untill(2007) and trust me when i tell you that the first thing that the big sky needs to do is boost its football facilities. (w/ the exception of Montana).
Montana - with their stadium at 23,000 and adding a upper deck this 2008 season are good as far as facilities. very loyal fan support also, damn jumbotron is from time square. very nice.
Eastern -My School- just finished a renovation two years ago that gave the field a nice pressbox, lockeroom and entrance. Its a very comfortable stadium, however they need to add more seating on the visitor side at least 5,000 and remove the track and lower the field, which will allow for more seats also. it also rains alot and the natural grass gets bad bc they let highschool teams play there sometimes on a friday b4 the game. the max seating capacity, w/ seats adding for speacial occasion aka montana games is 12,000. all right but not great by far.
Portland st. the need a REAL *FOOTBALL* stadium, they play in a renovated baseball field with no opposing side. it doesnt really feel like ur in a stadium. basically u dont get the COLLEGE football "feel". on top of that, the surface is the old school astro turf! it sucks. the capacity is about 20,000 which would be very nice if it werent a baseball/ football field.
Sacramento state- very nice stadium, seats about 18-19,000 MAX, they have one of those blow up tunnels, but the cant fill the damn thing, everytime we played their they only had about 5,000 at most. they have lots of students at the school just not much support. They also need to remove the track, which is sometimes used for olympic trial meets.
Montana State- their stadium seats about 15,000 and they do a good job filling it. they have a "ok" press box but enough seating for the "college football" feel. they are currently expanding the stadium as we speak. the one bad thing however is the natural grass. alot lke eastern washington, it gets very cold and wet late in the season and the natural turf has a hard time holding up.
Idaho state - dome seats about 12,000 in a layout similar to idaho's kibbie dome. very tuff turf. i mean its not astro turf, its something else bc there are artificial little "blades of grass" but man it hurts to slide on that thing. idaho state's capacity is fixed at 12,000 so for expansion its gonna be very hard bc the dome is more of a fixed object. the kibbie dome is under renovation, there lowering the field for more seats along with other things, they were gonna add a 2nd deck which would have just about doubled the capacity but the plann was rejected. isu's dome is hard to win in bc of the good fan support and the echoing dome, however it needs better playing surface, more seating, at least 18,000.
NAU- dome is similar to idaho states, but is more up-to-date, and has a nice size screen, the capacity is about 17,000 and they do an good job of filling it. however soon - if they expand later- they will runb into the same prob as idaho and idaho st.
weber state - ver nice field, has a great 3 story press box, and newly renovated with jumbotron, and seats about 17,000. this stadium would be absolutley great IF;
1 they take away the track, back in the day that was a good idea but now it takes away from the feel, any college football player would agree.
2 enclose the stadium, it open on both sides, so the noise isnt a big factor and takes away from the 12th man,
3 they have a hard time filling it, maybe about 6 thousand on average.
Northern Colorado - save these guys for last! okay here we go, i know u just came from d-2 but COME ON, theyre needs to be more seating and all around stadium design. you can tell this was a d-2 stadium and im sure in the years to come, they will fix it up, but damn! the lockerroom is about 200 yards from the field so u get dressed the walk over to the field, x the track. it had about 5,000 capacity. and they fill it to about 4,000. good for a d-2 not for fcs.
Things to know, the college football feel is why 1-aa players love to play 1-a teams bc of the stadium and competition, u get beat up but your at a nice stadium. take a lesson from montana, the absence of a track brings the fans closer, = louder. the crowd helps in momentum and there for it helps the team, there a corillation between the dedication the school puts towards a nice stadium and the amount of wins the team gets. more fan base also brings in more money and its aupward spiral in most cases.
big sky stadium rankings; ( taking everything into consideration including design and fan base)
1-Montana - Washington Grizzley Stadium
2-Montana State - Martel Field
3-Eastern Washington -Woodward Field
4-Weber State - Stewart Stadium
5-Portland State - PGE park
6-Northern Arizona - Walkup Skydome
7-Sacramento State - Hornet Stadium
8-Idaho State - Holt Arena
9-Northern Colorado - Nottingham Field
the conference rankins are almost exactly the same.
THE CONFERENCE- the dakotas are out, they are too far, cal poly and uc davis play the big sky team so often we pretty much see them as in the comf already. they dont have that many members in their conf so they schedule the big sky games every year any way. As it turns out, the 2 teams are on the same athletic level as the big sky schools athletically and facilitiy-wise also.
UC Davis - Aggie Stadium, build in 2007 brand new 10,000 with plans to expand to 30,000 in the future.
Cal poly - Alex Spanos Stadium renovated in 2008, 12,000 seats max, with plans to expand to 20,000 in the future.
The big sky conf had been 8 teams deep for a while so it doesnt feel right with nor col making it 9 teams. nor col also has a long way to go before they will be strong enough to win the bsc. montana has won outright or shared the title in 11 of last 14 years. nor col aint close to that and its only right to bring in suu, cal poly, and uc davis. and do the coastal/ mountain thing. i hate that the big sky brought in nor col bc they made the conf un even at 9. but since they did, they might as well expand in to 12 bc that ould make it even more of an elite conference. after that they should LOCK IT. like the pack ten. nobody comes in , nobody comes out. then it would be perfect.
Coastal ..............................................................Mountain
1. Portland State................................................... 1. Montana
2. Sacramento State ...............................................2. Montana State
3. Cal Poly ...........................................................3. Northern Colorado
4. UC Davis ..........................................................4. Weber State
5. Eastern Washington .............................................5. Southern Utah
6. Northern Arizona .................................................6. Idaho State
Last but no least The big sky should impose a minimum PERMANENT stadium capacity about 18,000. Give the team about 2 or 3 years to accomplish this, and then place goals for the schools to meet. example 65% -70% full on average in the season. there shouldnt be any large penalties but something just to make the Athletic Director/school/cheerleaders get off their butt and advertise & therfore increase the attendance. This would increase income for the school, as well as school prestige and recruiting. Making for better schools and a better conference.
those are my thoughts i wanna know what u guys think.
Go Eags!
Montana - with their stadium at 23,000 and adding a upper deck this 2008 season are good as far as facilities. very loyal fan support also, damn jumbotron is from time square. very nice.
Eastern -My School- just finished a renovation two years ago that gave the field a nice pressbox, lockeroom and entrance. Its a very comfortable stadium, however they need to add more seating on the visitor side at least 5,000 and remove the track and lower the field, which will allow for more seats also. it also rains alot and the natural grass gets bad bc they let highschool teams play there sometimes on a friday b4 the game. the max seating capacity, w/ seats adding for speacial occasion aka montana games is 12,000. all right but not great by far.
Portland st. the need a REAL *FOOTBALL* stadium, they play in a renovated baseball field with no opposing side. it doesnt really feel like ur in a stadium. basically u dont get the COLLEGE football "feel". on top of that, the surface is the old school astro turf! it sucks. the capacity is about 20,000 which would be very nice if it werent a baseball/ football field.
Sacramento state- very nice stadium, seats about 18-19,000 MAX, they have one of those blow up tunnels, but the cant fill the damn thing, everytime we played their they only had about 5,000 at most. they have lots of students at the school just not much support. They also need to remove the track, which is sometimes used for olympic trial meets.
Montana State- their stadium seats about 15,000 and they do a good job filling it. they have a "ok" press box but enough seating for the "college football" feel. they are currently expanding the stadium as we speak. the one bad thing however is the natural grass. alot lke eastern washington, it gets very cold and wet late in the season and the natural turf has a hard time holding up.
Idaho state - dome seats about 12,000 in a layout similar to idaho's kibbie dome. very tuff turf. i mean its not astro turf, its something else bc there are artificial little "blades of grass" but man it hurts to slide on that thing. idaho state's capacity is fixed at 12,000 so for expansion its gonna be very hard bc the dome is more of a fixed object. the kibbie dome is under renovation, there lowering the field for more seats along with other things, they were gonna add a 2nd deck which would have just about doubled the capacity but the plann was rejected. isu's dome is hard to win in bc of the good fan support and the echoing dome, however it needs better playing surface, more seating, at least 18,000.
NAU- dome is similar to idaho states, but is more up-to-date, and has a nice size screen, the capacity is about 17,000 and they do an good job of filling it. however soon - if they expand later- they will runb into the same prob as idaho and idaho st.
weber state - ver nice field, has a great 3 story press box, and newly renovated with jumbotron, and seats about 17,000. this stadium would be absolutley great IF;
1 they take away the track, back in the day that was a good idea but now it takes away from the feel, any college football player would agree.
2 enclose the stadium, it open on both sides, so the noise isnt a big factor and takes away from the 12th man,
3 they have a hard time filling it, maybe about 6 thousand on average.
Northern Colorado - save these guys for last! okay here we go, i know u just came from d-2 but COME ON, theyre needs to be more seating and all around stadium design. you can tell this was a d-2 stadium and im sure in the years to come, they will fix it up, but damn! the lockerroom is about 200 yards from the field so u get dressed the walk over to the field, x the track. it had about 5,000 capacity. and they fill it to about 4,000. good for a d-2 not for fcs.
Things to know, the college football feel is why 1-aa players love to play 1-a teams bc of the stadium and competition, u get beat up but your at a nice stadium. take a lesson from montana, the absence of a track brings the fans closer, = louder. the crowd helps in momentum and there for it helps the team, there a corillation between the dedication the school puts towards a nice stadium and the amount of wins the team gets. more fan base also brings in more money and its aupward spiral in most cases.
big sky stadium rankings; ( taking everything into consideration including design and fan base)
1-Montana - Washington Grizzley Stadium
2-Montana State - Martel Field
3-Eastern Washington -Woodward Field
4-Weber State - Stewart Stadium
5-Portland State - PGE park
6-Northern Arizona - Walkup Skydome
7-Sacramento State - Hornet Stadium
8-Idaho State - Holt Arena
9-Northern Colorado - Nottingham Field
the conference rankins are almost exactly the same.
THE CONFERENCE- the dakotas are out, they are too far, cal poly and uc davis play the big sky team so often we pretty much see them as in the comf already. they dont have that many members in their conf so they schedule the big sky games every year any way. As it turns out, the 2 teams are on the same athletic level as the big sky schools athletically and facilitiy-wise also.
UC Davis - Aggie Stadium, build in 2007 brand new 10,000 with plans to expand to 30,000 in the future.
Cal poly - Alex Spanos Stadium renovated in 2008, 12,000 seats max, with plans to expand to 20,000 in the future.
The big sky conf had been 8 teams deep for a while so it doesnt feel right with nor col making it 9 teams. nor col also has a long way to go before they will be strong enough to win the bsc. montana has won outright or shared the title in 11 of last 14 years. nor col aint close to that and its only right to bring in suu, cal poly, and uc davis. and do the coastal/ mountain thing. i hate that the big sky brought in nor col bc they made the conf un even at 9. but since they did, they might as well expand in to 12 bc that ould make it even more of an elite conference. after that they should LOCK IT. like the pack ten. nobody comes in , nobody comes out. then it would be perfect.
Coastal ..............................................................Mountain
1. Portland State................................................... 1. Montana
2. Sacramento State ...............................................2. Montana State
3. Cal Poly ...........................................................3. Northern Colorado
4. UC Davis ..........................................................4. Weber State
5. Eastern Washington .............................................5. Southern Utah
6. Northern Arizona .................................................6. Idaho State
Last but no least The big sky should impose a minimum PERMANENT stadium capacity about 18,000. Give the team about 2 or 3 years to accomplish this, and then place goals for the schools to meet. example 65% -70% full on average in the season. there shouldnt be any large penalties but something just to make the Athletic Director/school/cheerleaders get off their butt and advertise & therfore increase the attendance. This would increase income for the school, as well as school prestige and recruiting. Making for better schools and a better conference.
those are my thoughts i wanna know what u guys think.
Go Eags!
Last edited by BlackFalkin on Wed Sep 24, 2008 1:03 pm, edited 2 times in total.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
I think you've got too much time on your hands....
Seriously though, it's all good. But there ain't no WAY the Sky is gonna impose permanent stadium capacity minimums and only give someone 2-3 years to accomplish it. That's just not feasible.
Seriously though, it's all good. But there ain't no WAY the Sky is gonna impose permanent stadium capacity minimums and only give someone 2-3 years to accomplish it. That's just not feasible.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
- BlackFalkin
- Level3
- Posts: 3865
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
- I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
- Location: Southern California
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
Dont u think every school in the big sky should have the support montana has? and the stadium to match?
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45613
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
It would be nice to have a better stadium - I wish NAU had an outdoor stadium. But not happening right now.
BTW - NAU just got new turf - probably the second nicest surface in the Sky, right up with Montana's
BTW - NAU just got new turf - probably the second nicest surface in the Sky, right up with Montana's
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
I think they SHOULD, but that's hugely different from the Big Sky MANDATING it.BlackFalkin wrote:Dont u think every school in the big sky should have the support montana has? and the stadium to match?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
-
- Level5
- Posts: 14137
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
BlackFalkin wrote:Dont u think every school in the big sky should have the support montana has? and the stadium to match?
Maybe they should, but there's no way most of them would be able to accomplish that.
If a mandate was imposed by the BSC, those schools would rather bolt & become independents, thus dissolving the conference. Not that the mandate could happen, anyway, since most (if not all; I'm not sure how the bylaws work on something like this) of the schools would have to agree.
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
Montana State no longer has natural grass. Field Turf was installed this summer.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 12:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
I think PGE just installed FieldTurf as well, so the surface should be better. Really, though, the only way to have decent D-I facilities and fans support in the BSC is to move the schools to areas that care about the schools instead of a I-A school nearby - which would basically just leave Montana and the Dakotas (unless Wyoming and Idaho drop down).
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet
- Posts: 20548
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
- putter
- Level2
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- Location: Great Falls, Montana
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
I would have thought that most schools would have.BlackFalkin wrote:Dont u think every school in the big sky should have the support montana has? and the stadium to match?
Weber- Have to compete with Utah and Utah St but they have the population to get good crowds. have a great stadium and, up against the Wasatch - is beautiful
Sac - I realize you have Stanford, Cal and Davis nearby but again, you have a population advantage and would hope that you hit 10k average in the next few years
PSU - another school that has to compete with UO and OSU. They NEED their own on campus stadium. I believe this would get much more student involvement and community involvement. Despite the Ducks and Beavers, there should be no reason you can get 10k to your games.
EWU - in process of upgrading but I don't know if you could average 10k with Pullman so close and the overall size of Cheney.
MSU - will be right on top of Montana in a few years. New turf, already getting over 14k and an planned expansion that is very well thought out (unlike Montana).
UNC - I hope they have some plan. Again a school with competition with many IA schools but the overall Denver area population should give the Bears some hope to grow in the future.
ISU - I think this is hopeless as you can look at Idaho. The big dogs are the Broncos and you won't compete until the school puts a winner on the field and even then getting to 10k will be tough. Too much apathy.
NAU - I think NAU, if they can start consistently getting to the playoffs, can really grow and average close to capacity. You don't compete with UA and ASU because of you location so you have a captive audience.
"Born in other countries, yet believing you could be happy in this, our laws acknowledge, as they should do, your right to join us in society, conforming, as I doubt not you will do, to our established rules. That these rules shall be as equal as prudential considerations will admit, will certainly be the aim of our legislatures, general and particular." --Thomas Jefferson, letter to Hugh White, 1801
- BlackFalkin
- Level3
- Posts: 3865
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
- I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
- Location: Southern California
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
honestly, ur views are correctly idaho state is almost hopeless bc boise state runs idaho, and they still have to compete with 1-a idaho vandal. however i do think that, having played at both, montana's stadium being ALL CONCRETE, is very intimidating and montana state will have a hard time topping the double decks on wash-griz stadium.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 10:18 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana State
- A.K.A.: Weltercat
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
I absolutely love going to games at PSU's PGE Park. The end zone seating is great they serve beer and it's a really fun tailgate and it's in a fun part of town. I think it's the best in the BSC.
- lifesapuntreturn
- Level1
- Posts: 250
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:25 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana State University
- Location: USA (Unfettered Socialism Abounds)
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
Regarding the Portland State stadium situation:
It isn't going to change unless/until the city of Portland and state of Oregon decide to appropriate funding for a new multi-purpose stadium in downtown Portland. That won't happen unless/until the Portland city fathers are able to get a solid commitment from a major league baseball team to relocate to Portland.
The new stadium issue has been hashed and re-hashed several times and it always dies on the vine for the same reason - there is no reason to build one. PGE Park aka Civic Stadium's tenants are PSU football, the AAA baseball team and the "major league" soccer team. None of them consistently draws even 10,000 fans.
Portland tried desperately a few years ago to lure the Montreal Expos to Portland but they lost out to Washington DC, which has since built a new stadium for them, now the Washington Senators. When Portland lost that battle, the stadium plans were put back on hold. Until another major league baseball team is on the ropes financially to the point where they have to relocate (until this season it was the Tampa Bay Rays but now they are planning a new stadium and with their first-ever playoff appearance it will get the political support it needs in TB), Portland and PSU will be stuck with PGE Park.
Oregon and Oregon State command the vast majority of the political support in Salem for things like capital improvements. PSU is simply a commuter school that serves many non-traditional (25+ and part-time) students. I wouldn't be surprised to see PSU merged with the Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) in the future and have PSU/OHSU simply drop all sports and become an all academic institution. jmho
It isn't going to change unless/until the city of Portland and state of Oregon decide to appropriate funding for a new multi-purpose stadium in downtown Portland. That won't happen unless/until the Portland city fathers are able to get a solid commitment from a major league baseball team to relocate to Portland.
The new stadium issue has been hashed and re-hashed several times and it always dies on the vine for the same reason - there is no reason to build one. PGE Park aka Civic Stadium's tenants are PSU football, the AAA baseball team and the "major league" soccer team. None of them consistently draws even 10,000 fans.
Portland tried desperately a few years ago to lure the Montreal Expos to Portland but they lost out to Washington DC, which has since built a new stadium for them, now the Washington Senators. When Portland lost that battle, the stadium plans were put back on hold. Until another major league baseball team is on the ropes financially to the point where they have to relocate (until this season it was the Tampa Bay Rays but now they are planning a new stadium and with their first-ever playoff appearance it will get the political support it needs in TB), Portland and PSU will be stuck with PGE Park.
Oregon and Oregon State command the vast majority of the political support in Salem for things like capital improvements. PSU is simply a commuter school that serves many non-traditional (25+ and part-time) students. I wouldn't be surprised to see PSU merged with the Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) in the future and have PSU/OHSU simply drop all sports and become an all academic institution. jmho
- BlackFalkin
- Level3
- Posts: 3865
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
- I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
- Location: Southern California
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
should the conf build or stay the same, should it concentrate on building the current programs it already has???
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
- putter
- Level2
- Posts: 1134
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- Location: Great Falls, Montana
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
That is very interesting I makes me wonder. If the school presidents put that much thought into their athletics why did they go after PSU when it seems they are a school that is stuck?lifesapuntreturn wrote:Regarding the Portland State stadium situation:
It isn't going to change unless/until the city of Portland and state of Oregon decide to appropriate funding for a new multi-purpose stadium in downtown Portland. That won't happen unless/until the Portland city fathers are able to get a solid commitment from a major league baseball team to relocate to Portland.
The new stadium issue has been hashed and re-hashed several times and it always dies on the vine for the same reason - there is no reason to build one. PGE Park aka Civic Stadium's tenants are PSU football, the AAA baseball team and the "major league" soccer team. None of them consistently draws even 10,000 fans.
Portland tried desperately a few years ago to lure the Montreal Expos to Portland but they lost out to Washington DC, which has since built a new stadium for them, now the Washington Senators. When Portland lost that battle, the stadium plans were put back on hold. Until another major league baseball team is on the ropes financially to the point where they have to relocate (until this season it was the Tampa Bay Rays but now they are planning a new stadium and with their first-ever playoff appearance it will get the political support it needs in TB), Portland and PSU will be stuck with PGE Park.
Oregon and Oregon State command the vast majority of the political support in Salem for things like capital improvements. PSU is simply a commuter school that serves many non-traditional (25+ and part-time) students. I wouldn't be surprised to see PSU merged with the Oregon Health Sciences University (OHSU) in the future and have PSU/OHSU simply drop all sports and become an all academic institution. jmho
"Born in other countries, yet believing you could be happy in this, our laws acknowledge, as they should do, your right to join us in society, conforming, as I doubt not you will do, to our established rules. That these rules shall be as equal as prudential considerations will admit, will certainly be the aim of our legislatures, general and particular." --Thomas Jefferson, letter to Hugh White, 1801
- weberwildcat
- Level2
- Posts: 1649
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:17 pm
- I am a fan of: WEEber State
- A.K.A.: WeberHoops.com
- Location: San Jose, CA
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
BlackFalkin wrote:
Idaho state - dome seats about 12,000 in a layout similar to idaho's kibbie dome. very tuff turf. i mean its not astro turf, its something else bc there are artificial little "blades of grass" but man it hurts to slide on that thing. idaho state's capacity is fixed at 12,000 so for expansion its gonna be very hard bc the dome is more of a fixed object. the kibbie dome is under renovation, there lowering the field for more seats along with other things, they were gonna add a 2nd deck which would have just about doubled the capacity but the plann was rejected. isu's dome is hard to win in bc of the good fan support and the echoing dome, however it needs better playing surface, more seating, at least 18,000.
weber state - ver nice field, has a great 3 story press box, and newly renovated with jumbotron, and seats about 17,000. this stadium would be absolutley great IF;
1 they take away the track, back in the day that was a good idea but now it takes away from the feel, any college football player would agree.
2 enclose the stadium, it open on both sides, so the noise isnt a big factor and takes away from the 12th man,
3 they have a hard time filling it, maybe about 6 thousand on average.
big sky stadium rankings; ( taking everything into consideration including design and fan base)
1-Montana - Washington Grizzley Stadium
2-Montana State - Martel Field
3-Eastern Washington -Woodward Field
4-Weber State - Stewart Stadium
5-Portland State - PGE park
6-Northern Arizona - Walkup Skydome
7-Sacramento State - Hornet Stadium
8-Idaho State - Holt Arena
9-Northern Colorado - Nottingham Field
the conference rankins are almost exactly the same.
Coastal ..............................................................Mountain
1. Portland State................................................... 1. Montana
2. Sacramento State ...............................................2. Montana State
3. Cal Poly ...........................................................3. Northern Colorado
4. UC Davis ..........................................................4. Weber State
5. Eastern Washington .............................................5. Southern Utah
6. Northern Arizona .................................................6. Idaho State
Last but no least The big sky should impose a minimum PERMANENT stadium capacity about 18,000. Give the team about 2 or 3 years to accomplish this, and then place goals for the schools to meet. example 65% -70% full on average in the season. there shouldnt be any large penalties but something just to make the Athletic Director/school/cheerleaders get off their butt and advertise & therfore increase the attendance. This would increase income for the school, as well as school prestige and recruiting. Making for better schools and a better conference.
those are my thoughts i wanna know what u guys think.
Go Eags!
Please....
WSU's stadium schools MSU's and EWU's, 2nd best in the conference and WSU is a basketball school and track school so the track will never go.
WSU gets low attendance so expanding it would be a joke. Even its 17,000 is still bigger than half the 'Sky.
To not say ISU's is the worst is a laff, that is a garbage bag of a facility! Upgrading it is more of a laff!
UNC's isnt much worse than EWU's, just smaller. Only seats 8,000 but they've been DI for 3 years.
Can't really say PSU's is all that nice, its a minor league baseball stadium...
As for basketball, WSU's stadium is bigger or as big as half the conference's football stadiums.
Question: Y cant we have this discussion on BigSkyfans.com?
Why is the EWU fan not posting on the BigSkyfans network?
Also, UC Davis and Cal Poly will never happen. They are happy in their lame conf for football and they love the Big West for bball and especially baseball which the 'Sky doesnt have.
SUU - too small even for the 'Sky, they don't even meet the scholarship requirements for a DI-A team to even play them. It wouldnt count toward a bowl win if you wonder why they never play I-A schools.
- BlackFalkin
- Level3
- Posts: 3865
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
- I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
- Location: Southern California
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
Well WSU need to get rid of that ugly purple track and fill it up, bc a 3 story pressbox and an 17,000 seat stadium doesnt mean anything when only 3,000 people show up. Damn Mormons! j/k
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
- weberwildcat
- Level2
- Posts: 1649
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:17 pm
- I am a fan of: WEEber State
- A.K.A.: WeberHoops.com
- Location: San Jose, CA
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
Hey like I said, we are a good track school. No reason to move it...BlackFalkin wrote:Well WSU need to get rid of that ugly purple track and fill it up, bc a 3 story pressbox and an 17,000 seat stadium doesnt mean anything when only 3,000 people show up. Damn Mormons! j/k
Your the one that said we need to expand our stadium, I never said we sell it out.
- weberwildcat
- Level2
- Posts: 1649
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:17 pm
- I am a fan of: WEEber State
- A.K.A.: WeberHoops.com
- Location: San Jose, CA
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
BlackFalkin wrote:Well WSU need to get rid of that ugly purple track and fill it up, bc a 3 story pressbox and an 17,000 seat stadium doesnt mean anything when only 3,000 people show up. Damn Mormons! j/k
Hey Eag,
You had me thinking WSU's stadium was pretty lame! Yikes!!! After seeing all the I-AA stadiums, I've come to the conclusion that our's is pretty nice! Probably better than most of the nation including EWU's.
http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/stadiums/
Although, the pic of WSU's in the datebase is from the '90s and out of date, it doesn't show the pressbox that was built in 2001 which is 6 stories and 38,000 square feet.
- BlackFalkin
- Level3
- Posts: 3865
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
- I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
- Location: Southern California
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
Whoa, dont get me wrong its a very nice 1-aa stadium,and they also added that nice replay screen, but the pressbox looks like 3 stories from on the field. I was saying that IT WOULD BE EVEN BETTER if they took that track out, and enclosed it. btw Eastern & Nor Col need to step it up alsoweberwildcat wrote: Hey Eag,
You had me thinking WSU's stadium was pretty lame! Yikes!!! After seeing all the I-AA stadiums, I've come to the conclusion that our's is pretty nice! Probably better than most of the nation including EWU's.
http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/stadiums/
Although, the pic of WSU's in the datebase is from the '90s and out of date, it doesn't show the pressbox that was built in 2001 which is 6 stories and 38,000 square feet.
BTW they could always put the track somewhere else like right next to the stadium, just not inside the stadium.
YOU GOTTA ADMIT it would be better that way right? u bastard?
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
- weberwildcat
- Level2
- Posts: 1649
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:17 pm
- I am a fan of: WEEber State
- A.K.A.: WeberHoops.com
- Location: San Jose, CA
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
Hey quit haten!! and my parents were married when i was born!!BlackFalkin wrote:Whoa, dont get me wrong its a very nice 1-aa stadium,and they also added that nice replay screen, but the pressbox looks like 3 stories from on the field. I was saying that IT WOULD BE EVEN BETTER if they took that track out, and enclosed it. btw Eastern & Nor Col need to step it up alsoweberwildcat wrote: Hey Eag,
You had me thinking WSU's stadium was pretty lame! Yikes!!! After seeing all the I-AA stadiums, I've come to the conclusion that our's is pretty nice! Probably better than most of the nation including EWU's.
http://www.championshipsubdivision.com/stadiums/
Although, the pic of WSU's in the datebase is from the '90s and out of date, it doesn't show the pressbox that was built in 2001 which is 6 stories and 38,000 square feet.
BTW they could always put the track somewhere else like right next to the stadium, just not inside the stadium.
YOU GOTTA ADMIT it would be better that way right? u bastard?
yes, i agree it would be way better, but it would never happen. Ithink if Caoch Mac was 10 yrs younger he could really do some good things with the program and add on to the stadium and maybe move up to I-A, why not? Look what he did for Utah? They were a joke before he got the job. Also, USU is I-A, must not be that hard to do...
But Mac wont be coaching WSU that long unless he is the new Jo-Pa!
- BlackFalkin
- Level3
- Posts: 3865
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:49 pm
- I am a fan of: EASTERN WASHINGTON
- Location: Southern California
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
true. Football is usually the big money maker at most div 1 schools, so you would think they would invest a little bit per year on upgrades. Btw woodward field can also use more upgrades. but weber st's field has lots of potential but f*ck they need some advertising.
EWU FOOTBALL 2004|2005|2010|2012|2013|2014|2016|2018|BigSky Champions
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
EASTERN WASHINGTON|2010 NATIONAL CHAMPIONS
- weberwildcat
- Level2
- Posts: 1649
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 9:17 pm
- I am a fan of: WEEber State
- A.K.A.: WeberHoops.com
- Location: San Jose, CA
Re: Big Sky Stadiums (Problems)
For the CAA being so legit, their stadiums sure are small.
Like 3 of em less than 9,000 seats. Only like 2 over 15,000. I thought the big sky stadiums were teeny...
Like 3 of em less than 9,000 seats. Only like 2 over 15,000. I thought the big sky stadiums were teeny...