http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepubli ... ite25.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
versus someone with a conscience:The arguments against homeowners intentionally defaulting on their mortgages generally center on the same three basic points.
First, underwater homeowners "promised" to pay their mortgages when they signed the mortgage contract. Second, foreclosures lead to depreciation of neighborhoods, so underwater homeowners should hang on in order to help preserve their neighbors' property values. And, third, if all underwater homeowners defaulted, the housing market might crash. Homeowners thus have a social obligation to pay their underwater mortgage in order to save the economy.
While all three of these arguments might hold some initial appeal, none holds water.
http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepubli ... ngs25.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The comments below the first article are simply mind-numbing. The complete and utter lack of a conscience or moral responsibility in this country is truly frightening.If the anecdotes don't dispel the myths about hardship, the data are irrefutable. Of the foreclosures in the second half of 2008, only 183,447 resulted from the loss of employment. Other foreclosures? Negative net equity: 283,305; a 3 percent or less down payment: 130,014; low initial interest rate going higher: 60,942; and poor FICO score: 148, 697.
So, 624,958 foreclosures for financial folly vs. 183,447 for loss of employment. The 12 percent of the homes with negative equity are responsible for 47 percent of the foreclosures. Pick-a-Pay repeat default rates are 55 percent. If you refinance the mortgage-challenged, the default rate is 55 percent on their refinance.
We haven't seen the worst of it yet, folks. Meanwhile, the dipshits in Washington are holding summits on greenhouse gasses. Talk about fiddling while Rome burns...



