Good! I could care less what a Rand Paul supporter thinks about me or anything else.youngterrier wrote:"I'm tolerant of people....as long as they agree with me"mainejeff wrote:
Southern trash like you should be locked up or shipped out to another country that may make you appreciate this one more.........
I could say "typical liberal" but I don't think you're ALL like that (however you continue to lower my expectations)
As much as we should expect from an intolerant religious fanatic Southern piece of trash like yourself???catamount man wrote:your first mistake YT was expecting anything redeeming about a liberal. It's okay. Now you know better!youngterrier wrote: "I'm tolerant of people....as long as they agree with me"
I could say "typical liberal" but I don't think you're ALL like that (however you continue to lower my expectations)
People attack Obama (verbally, in print, internet, television, radio) all the time. Why do people think that that Obama isn't or can't be attacked when that is obviously NOT the case????SuperHornet wrote:For once, I actually agree with clenz. Amazing!clenz wrote:So Obama can attack people/companies, but Obama can't be attacked....
Sounds kind of like the Muslims and Muhammad to me.
Sure, people criticize Obama all the time, but whoever does gets attacked as being a racist virtually every timemainejeff wrote:People attack Obama (verbally, in print, internet, television, radio) all the time. Why do people think that that Obama isn't or can't be attacked when that is obviously NOT the case????SuperHornet wrote:
For once, I actually agree with clenz. Amazing!
. Bullshit.Baldy wrote:Sure, people criticize Obama all the time, but whoever does gets attacked as being a racist virtually every timemainejeff wrote:
People attack Obama (verbally, in print, internet, television, radio) all the time. Why do people think that that Obama isn't or can't be attacked when that is obviously NOT the case????
baldy wrote:Sure, people criticize Obama all the time, but whoever does gets attacked as being a racist virtually every time
Bullshit.SuperHornet wrote:baldy wrote:Sure, people criticize Obama all the time, but whoever does gets attacked as being a racist virtually every time
Even when those who support African-American Republicans are deemed "racist" for smacking Obama.
is it.mainejeff wrote:Bullshit.Baldy wrote: Sure, people criticize Obama all the time, but whoever does gets attacked as being a racist virtually every time
Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:is it.mainejeff wrote:
Bullshit.
Why would you take anything maryjane says seriously?!??? 
I don't, and never have. I try to match his economy of thought and simpleton statements with something that reflects a similar lack of thought.native wrote:Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: is it.
A flea's arse on a pimple on the tit of a boar hog has more meaning than maryjane's posts.
are ya.mainejeff wrote:Talk about simpletons........
Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:I don't, and never have. I try to match his economy of thought and simpleton statements with something that reflects a similar lack of thought.native wrote:
A flea's arse on a pimple on the tit of a boar hog has more meaning than maryjane's posts.
Enter Mr. Kleanmrklean wrote:Rand Paul is a Freaking REPUKE tool. How the Hell can you defend BP. If you screw up, be a damn man and take the blame. Dont be a pussy and try to shift the blame. Just saying!!!
Good to see ya make it around here finally MK.mrklean wrote:MR> KLEAN IS BACK BROTHERS!!!!!!!!!
mrklean wrote:MR> KLEAN IS BACK BROTHERS!!!!!!!!!
Shouldn't that be tapping instead of taping?Baldy wrote:mrklean wrote:MR> KLEAN IS BACK BROTHERS!!!!!!!!!
Re: Rand Paul: Obama's Criticism of BP 'Un-American'
"Don't misunderstand why I have come. I did not come to abolish the law of Moses or the writings of the prophets. No, I came to accomplish their purpose." Matthew 5:17kalm wrote:Jesus was a liberal.catamount man wrote:
your first mistake YT was expecting anything redeeming about a liberal. It's okay. Now you know better!
I cannot speak for your generation, but in my generation there are lots of thoughtful, intelligent and fair-minded liberals.youngterrier wrote: ...I could say "typical liberal" but I don't think you're ALL like that (however you continue to lower my expectations)
native wrote:I cannot speak for your generation, but in my generation there are lots of thoughtful, intelligent and fair-minded liberals.youngterrier wrote: ...I could say "typical liberal" but I don't think you're ALL like that (however you continue to lower my expectations)
Perhaps only a couple post on this site.
Despite what El Rushbo may say, liberalism itself is noble. The problem is with the liberals themselves. Something about the anonymity of the internet and our collective sophomoric jocularity on this site emboldens them to create vacuous posts and/or make fools of themselves.
Ladies and gentlemen, I give you nathan, the Spiro Agnew cs.com. 
Agreed.native wrote:Despite what Olberman may say, conservatism itself is noble. The problem is with the CONKS themselves. Something about the anonymity of the internet and our collective sophomoric jocularity on this site emboldens them to create vacuous posts and/or make fools of themselves.
Interesting perspective from a fellow who's party nominee got elected by millions and millions of people who didn't have a fucking CLUE what their candidate stood for.OSBF wrote:I think everyone that has a voting interest in that election has a right to know exactly what he is and where he stands on the issuesPwns wrote:
He has an early lead over the dem in the polls, and if he can just keep his mouth shut and run out the clock, he'll win.
It's called being an informed voter
If I don't know enough about someone to cast an intelligent and informed vote, I won't vote for the person
Why thank you for the "compliment," dawg, although I am not an Agnew fan.houndawg wrote:native wrote:
I cannot speak for your generation, but in my generation there are lots of thoughtful, intelligent and fair-minded liberals.
Perhaps only a couple post on this site.
Despite what El Rushbo may say, liberalism itself is noble. The problem is with the liberals themselves. Something about the anonymity of the internet and our collective sophomoric jocularity on this site emboldens them to create vacuous posts and/or make fools of themselves.
