JohnStOnge wrote:I have long believed that the NFL is characterized by a mythology with respect to what might work. I think, for instance, that a triple option offense would work just fine in the NFL is a franchise committed to it and acquired the right type of players to run it. I think the spread option type of offense Appalachian State runs would work as well under the same circumstances.
The NFL operates on stereotypes and unproven assumptions. Nobody has the guts to be truely innovative.
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
That's one reason why I like college football better.
I agree with you here with a caveat. Certain plays like the option would have to be run with revised expectations. Given adequate attention, I think the option would be a great third-and-medium or two-point play; it will likely NOT work for the huge 50-yard gains Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas made famous from the 60s to the 80s. The idea that the corner linebackers are "too fast" for it to work under ANY circumstances is bogus, IMO. Of course, that's when it's used as a tool within another style of offense like many college teams do. In fact, one sees it often in the NFL during preseason, but it mysteriously disappears after the regular season starts. Of course, using the complete triple option attack (wishbone/Oregon Veer/spread option/etc.) COULD work if the team goes balls-to-the wall with recruiting and coaching commitment. But what one forgets is one also has to factor in the culture where one's team is located. For example, just a few years ago, it seemed as if the Steelers could have run the 'bone with their personnel (or with few changes), but it wouldn't have worked with their fan base. On the other hand, I would think the Cowboys could make it work with the fan base (much of whom would remember the option teams the Longhorns put on the field), but they have never been anywhere near the proper personnel for it. Sure one could make wholesale personnel changes, but many of the outgoing players would be fan favorites, which could lead to PR problems.
Up until this past Super Bowl, I would have agreed with your conclusion that NOBODY in the NFL is innovative anymore. While much of the NFL is the same way, I think Sean Payton put the kibosh on the generalization with his second-half-opening onside kick. But I agree with your overall conclusion so long as one means FCS; FBS is WAY too much like a business to be fun.