Cluck U wrote:
She should still be fired because she is still a racist. Have you seen the entire video?
Fact: she was a racist and did not help out the farmers because of their skin color. In fact, the only reason she initially referred them to a white lawyer was because she knew the person who sent her would follow up and she had to show that she tried to help...you, her words. Only later, when a lawyer had taken their money for 6 months, did she feel guilty and tried to help.
During the video, she says a couple times that she learned that it is about poor versus rich, but later in the video she stumbles and comes out and says that it is about black and white. Present time...not in the past.
Furthermore, she tells a story about some black farmer who died and some cousins wanted to force the sale of the land. In the end, the family only sold 62 of the 515 acres...and watch her roll her eyes and get a disgusted face when she says, "and guess what, they already have a WHITE man lined up to buy it, and its the land on the creek which is what he wanted".
Racist.
My grandfather died and one of my uncles forced the sale of the land...we didn't give a flying fvck about the color of the skin of the buyer.
Can you imagine the outrage if a white federal employee at the DOA expressing disgust while saying, "and guess what, they already have a BLACK person lined up to buy it.
She goes on to talk about how black people..."OUR people" (uhhhh...seems she forgot about that part about it not being a black/white thing ) should help each other out. It is about race with her.
Defend her all you want, she is still expressing racist sentiments...CURRENTLY...and she should be dismissed. A white person expressing the same thoughts would be called a racist...or a Tea Party racist.But she gets a new job offer.
Oh, and depsite the NAACP posting that their video is the FULL video...it is not. Anyone notice the funny splice at 20:59? Why was part of the FULL video edited out?
Cluck U is in meltdown mode.
