EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Political discussions
HI54UNI
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12394
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
Location: The Panther State

EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by HI54UNI »

EPA to Crack Down on Farm Dust

OKLAHOMA CITY -- The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is considering a crackdown on farm dust, so senators have signed a letter addressing their concerns on the possible regulations.

The letter dated July 23 to the EPA states, "If approved, would establish the most stringent and unparalleled regulation of dust in our nation's history." It further states, "We respect efforts for a clean and healthy environment, but not at the expense of common sense. These identified levels will be extremely burdensome for farmers and livestock producers to attain. Whether its livestock kicking up dust, soybeans being combined on a dry day in the fall, or driving a car down the gravel road, dust is a naturally occurring event."

"It's plain common sense, we don't want to do anything detrimental," said farmer Curtis Roberts. "If the dust is detrimental to us, it's going to be to everybody. We're not going to do anything to hurt ourselves or our farm."

Roberts, a fourth generation farmer and rancher in Arcadia, said regulating dust in rural areas will hurt farmers' harvest, cultivation and livelihood.

"Anytime you work ground, you're going to have dust. I don't know how they'll regulate it," Roberts said. "The regulations are going to put us down and keep us from doing things we need to be doing because of the EPA."


http://www.news9.com/Global/story.asp?S ... s=facebook

WTF? They need to make the EPA people that write this shit live in a rural area for a month in the fall. :wall: :wall: :wall: :wall: :wall: :wall:
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.

Progressivism is cancer

All my posts are satire
clenz
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 21211
Joined: Mon Jan 19, 2009 4:30 pm

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by clenz »

They realize that dust can't be controlled don't they?

A farmer doing work in a field, even a low till field, will create dust. Someone driving down a dirt/gravel road will create dust in the air....


A strong wind will stir up dust.


Clearly we need to regulate the wind as well.
User avatar
slycat
Level3
Level3
Posts: 3454
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2008 6:05 pm
I am a fan of: Texas State
Location: Houston, TX

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by slycat »

Dust is already regulated. A farm would be tough though. Construction sites and concrete plants are two examples. Heck even landfills have to water their roads to avoid dust.

If dust blows off-site and creates a nuisance then it can be a violation. This includes dirt roads. The property owners along the road are responsible. Usually no one cares because they all create dust together and live with it. But its when it affects someone that isn't a part of the road then those people might complain.

Its like smoke from outdoor burning or odor from a landfill. If they go off the property then it is regulated.
Image
JayJ79
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4253
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 7:52 pm
I am a fan of: myself

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by JayJ79 »

I close my eyes,
only for a moment,
and the moment's gone.
User avatar
Col Hogan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12230
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:29 am
I am a fan of: William & Mary
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by Col Hogan »

JayJ79 wrote:I close my eyes,
only for a moment,
and the moment's gone.
All my dreams
Pass before my eyes with curiosity

Dust in the wind
All they are is dust in the wind
“Tolerance and Apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.” Aristotle

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by Gil Dobie »

The EPA needs to get to the root of the problem and regulate the wind. :coffee:
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by AZGrizFan »

Dust is the main reason....nay the ONLY reason...why I still live in a county island completely surrounded by 3 cities (Cave Creek, Scottsdale, Phoenix).

Most of the roads in our area are dirt. Any city that were to annex us would immediately be responsible for ALL dust abatement on those dirt roads which would mean either paving them (which would probably cause a riot), chip-sealing them (again, a riot), or oiling them. All three VERY expensive alternatives which no city wants to take responsibility for.

Thus, we most likely will always remain a county island. :thumb: :thumb: :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by Cap'n Cat »

Not many of you are likely aware of this, but there is a new Food Safety initiative called SQF, which stands for Safe Quality Food, and dust is a serious problem. Many food manufacturers are going to it, too. Dust is not really the issue so much as the nasties carried in that dust. Mold and bacteria spores are present in dust and present food companies with expensive problems they've never had to deal with before, especially in mitigation.

It's all part of food protection, too, and to counter bioterrorism. The company I last worked for could not install windows on the north side of its building because, across the street was a large farm which, in addition to the two things named above, uses pesticides and fertilizers which easily become airborne and, conceivably, can settle on food contact surfaces, if not the food itself.

Yes, we've survived all these years without these proposed additional protections, but it is a diferent world. Bioterrorism is a very real threat and one that has not come to fruition to any large extent in the U.S...........yet. If you want to cripple America, go after its food and water.

To me, it's only a matter of time before something happens along these lines. Think of the devastation, for example if one terrorist motherfvcker dirty-bombed a large corn field in Iowa. Do you know how deep corn goes into our food system? Think of a coordinated dirty-bombing in just a few states. Think of how easy it would be to do. Doesn't have to be nuclear material, either.

Cap'n Cat
Food Guardian
User avatar
Wedgebuster
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12260
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:06 pm
I am a fan of: UNC BEARS
A.K.A.: OB55
Location: Where The Rivers Run North

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by Wedgebuster »

Cap'n Cat wrote:Not many of you are likely aware of this, but there is a new Food Safety initiative called SQF, which stands for Safe Quality Food, and dust is a serious problem. Many food manufacturers are going to it, too. Dust is not really the issue so much as the nasties carried in that dust. Mold and bacteria spores are present in dust and present food companies with expensive problems they've never had to deal with before, especially in mitigation.

It's all part of food protection, too, and to counter bioterrorism. The company I last worked for could not install windows on the north side of its building because, across the street was a large farm which, in addition to the two things named above, uses pesticides and fertilizers which easily become airborne and, conceivably, can settle on food contact surfaces, if not the food itself.

Yes, we've survived all these years without these proposed additional protections, but it is a diferent world. Bioterrorism is a very real threat and one that has not come to fruition to any large extent in the U.S...........yet. If you want to cripple America, go after its food and water.

To me, it's only a matter of time before something happens along these lines. Think of the devastation, for example if one terrorist motherfvcker dirty-bombed a large corn field in Iowa. Do you know how deep corn goes into our food system? Think of a coordinated dirty-bombing in just a few states. Think of how easy it would be to do. Doesn't have to be nuclear material, either.

Cap'n Cat
Food Guardian
Bastards! And by going after Iowa, they are going for the throat of our nation's breadbasket! :evil:

Katie bar the door! Damn the torpedos! Batton down the hatches! And God Save The Queen of Iowa!!

:notworthy: :notworthy:
Image
User avatar
Col Hogan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 12230
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:29 am
I am a fan of: William & Mary
Location: Republic of Texas

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by Col Hogan »

Cap'n Cat wrote:Not many of you are likely aware of this, but there is a new Food Safety initiative called SQF, which stands for Safe Quality Food, and dust is a serious problem. Many food manufacturers are going to it, too. Dust is not really the issue so much as the nasties carried in that dust. Mold and bacteria spores are present in dust and present food companies with expensive problems they've never had to deal with before, especially in mitigation.

It's all part of food protection, too, and to counter bioterrorism. The company I last worked for could not install windows on the north side of its building because, across the street was a large farm which, in addition to the two things named above, uses pesticides and fertilizers which easily become airborne and, conceivably, can settle on food contact surfaces, if not the food itself.

Yes, we've survived all these years without these proposed additional protections, but it is a diferent world. Bioterrorism is a very real threat and one that has not come to fruition to any large extent in the U.S...........yet. If you want to cripple America, go after its food and water.

To me, it's only a matter of time before something happens along these lines. Think of the devastation, for example if one terrorist motherfvcker dirty-bombed a large corn field in Iowa. Do you know how deep corn goes into our food system? Think of a coordinated dirty-bombing in just a few states. Think of how easy it would be to do. Doesn't have to be nuclear material, either.

Cap'n Cat
Food Guardian
Having worked in an anti-terrorism unit from 99-02, I can tell you we did a number of "what-if" drills on stuff just like this...

Even the rumor of something like Mad Cow being introduced into the meat supply could cripple business...

I'm not an expert on the proposed EPA dust control regulations, but I understand the point Cap makes in the above post...

It's a different world...
“Tolerance and Apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.” Aristotle

Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by Cap'n Cat »

I want to take the opportunity here to mark the first time Col Hogan has ever been positive (somewhat) about a Cap'n Cat post.
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14681
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by Skjellyfetti »

Good. The Dust Bowl was the worst man made environmental catastrophe in our nation's history. No need for a repeat. :ohno:

Image
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
From the class of 09
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:53 am
I am a fan of: Liberty

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by From the class of 09 »

Skjellyfetti wrote:Good. The Dust Bowl was the worst man made environmental catastrophe in our nation's history. No need for a repeat. :ohno:

Image
This may be the dumbest quote of the week. Comparing farming in the US today to farming in the US in the 30's shows just how little you know on this subject. Please refrain from speaking on subjects you know nothing about. :dunce:
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by dbackjon »

Dust SHOULD be regulated.

It is regulated on many businesses already, why not farms? Farmers can use many dust abatement steps, like no-till plowing, wind breaks, etc.

Agricultural dust is a major source of pollution in Arizona, and the cause of many multiple-car pile-ups, that have killed dozens of people this decade alone.


and don't get too smug with your county island leachery, Z - look for the requirement for ALL residental/traveled roads in the county to be paved in the near future.
:thumb:
From the class of 09
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:53 am
I am a fan of: Liberty

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by From the class of 09 »

dbackjon wrote:Dust SHOULD be regulated.

It is regulated on many businesses already, why not farms? Farmers can use many dust abatement steps, like no-till plowing, wind breaks, etc.

Agricultural dust is a major source of pollution in Arizona, and the cause of many multiple-car pile-ups, that have killed dozens of people this decade alone.


and don't get too smug with your county island leachery, Z - look for the requirement for ALL residental/traveled roads in the county to be paved in the near future.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I'm just going to say no and leave it and that cuz otherwise I may have to argue with my previous post
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by dbackjon »

From the class of 09 wrote:
dbackjon wrote:Dust SHOULD be regulated.

It is regulated on many businesses already, why not farms? Farmers can use many dust abatement steps, like no-till plowing, wind breaks, etc.

Agricultural dust is a major source of pollution in Arizona, and the cause of many multiple-car pile-ups, that have killed dozens of people this decade alone.


and don't get too smug with your county island leachery, Z - look for the requirement for ALL residental/traveled roads in the county to be paved in the near future.
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I'm just going to say no and leave it and that cuz otherwise I may have to argue with my previous post
Care to elaborate on your mirth?

Corporate farmers have forgotten the lessons learned in the Dust Bowl. Everything I posted is true...
:thumb:
User avatar
Gil Dobie
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 31515
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
Location: Historic Leduc Estate

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by Gil Dobie »

dbackjon wrote:Dust SHOULD be regulated.

It is regulated on many businesses already, why not farms? Farmers can use many dust abatement steps, like no-till plowing, wind breaks, etc.

Agricultural dust is a major source of pollution in Arizona, and the cause of many multiple-car pile-ups, that have killed dozens of people this decade alone.


and don't get too smug with your county island leachery, Z - look for the requirement for ALL residental/traveled roads in the county to be paved in the near future.
Arizona is just a large gravel pit anyway, how are you going to get anything but cactus and tumbleweeds to grow there. Maybe humans should live in the natural habitat of dust. :kisswink:
Image
From the class of 09
Posts: 97
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:53 am
I am a fan of: Liberty

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by From the class of 09 »

dbackjon wrote:
From the class of 09 wrote:
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I'm just going to say no and leave it and that cuz otherwise I may have to argue with my previous post
Care to elaborate on your mirth?

Corporate farmers have forgotten the lessons learned in the Dust Bowl. Everything I posted is true...


1) No-till farming is practiced in many parts of the US, the Midwest isn't the east coast although there are more trees in the Midwest then there every was in the 30's.
2) Arizona is mostly desert, no? Try googling phoenix pollution and tell me how many articles there are before they blame farming as a leading cause of the air pollution. In fact most blame it on all the people there and the natural climate of the area.
3) 43k fatal car crashes in US dozens due to dust in the last 10 years? ok assuming that’s true something like .02% are caused by dust. Why doesn’t the government focus on the cause of 40% of fatal crashes instead of .02? Talk to me when they’ve got that under control.
4) No way in the world will every traveled road in the US be paved in my lifetime. Get outside your suburban bubble. Show me any cost equation that makes it worth while to pave every traveled road. I have a feeling our friends up in Montana would find this one a stretch too.
5) Farmers remember the dust bowl. Why would the one occupation that rely on the land the most for the long term be the first to forget a natural disaster like that? Please give some back up to substantiate your claim.
:coffee:
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by dbackjon »

From the class of 09 wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
Care to elaborate on your mirth?

Corporate farmers have forgotten the lessons learned in the Dust Bowl. Everything I posted is true...


1) No-till farming is practiced in many parts of the US, the Midwest isn't the east coast although there are more trees in the Midwest then there every was in the 30's.
2) Arizona is mostly desert, no? Try googling phoenix pollution and tell me how many articles there are before they blame farming as a leading cause of the air pollution. In fact most blame it on all the people there and the natural climate of the area.
3) 43k fatal car crashes in US dozens due to dust in the last 10 years? ok assuming that’s true something like .02% are caused by dust. Why doesn’t the government focus on the cause of 40% of fatal crashes instead of .02? Talk to me when they’ve got that under control.
4) No way in the world will every traveled road in the US be paved in my lifetime. Get outside your suburban bubble. Show me any cost equation that makes it worth while to pave every traveled road. I have a feeling our friends up in Montana would find this one a stretch too.
5) Farmers remember the dust bowl. Why would the one occupation that rely on the land the most for the long term be the first to forget a natural disaster like that? Please give some back up to substantiate your claim.
:coffee:

1) Starting in the 70's, with then Sec of Ag's "fence to fence" farming policy, the majority of fence row tree lines, shelter belts, etc have been removed. Corporate farms, that encompass what used to be 5 or 6 smaller family farms, take out all the barriers between the old farms, leaving flat, sterile landscapes.

2) Is Arizona naturally dusty? Yup. Is there more dust today, because of farming? definately.
Is dust the only cause of pollution? Nope. Is it a major cause? YES. And Arizona is not mostly desert, so that shows how little you know
3) Dust storms cause major pile-ups, that could in the most cases be prevented with better farming practices. The I10 corridor between Phoenix and Tucson is especially prone to this. Every life saved is worth it.

4) Where did I say that every road should be paved? No where. But moderately traveled roads should be

5) Because the corporate farmers have lost the connection to the land, and are driven by pure profit motive. And BTW, my family still owns (and in the family) operates a smaller farm that has been in the family for almost 170 years.
:thumb:
User avatar
Cap'n Cat
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13614
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:38 am
I am a fan of: Mostly myself.
A.K.A.: LabiaInTheSunlight

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by Cap'n Cat »

You know, guys, this all started when we took God out of the public schools and let the Negro in.

:notworthy:
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by GannonFan »

dbackjon wrote:
4) Where did I say that every road should be paved? No where. But moderately traveled roads should be
Well, you did say this :
dbackjon wrote:look for the requirement for ALL residental/traveled roads in the county to be paved in the near future
Even I wasn't really sure what you were getting at with that. "Moderately traveled roads" (pretty vague) still sounds different than "all residential/traveled roads".
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by GannonFan »

Cap'n Cat wrote:You know, guys, this all started when we took God out of the public schools and let the Negro in.

:notworthy:
Not to mention when we started getting all these new fangled tv sets that broadcast in color. :nod:
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by AZGrizFan »

dbackjon wrote: and don't get too smug with your county island leachery, Z - look for the requirement for ALL residental/traveled roads in the county to be paved in the near future.
We can't even regulate the flow of drugs, and now you want to regulate DUST?

And unless the COUNTY passes a law requiring all traveled roads to be paved, it ain't happening in MY lifetime out here...we will most likely NEVER get annexed, for that very reason. :thumb: :thumb:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by dbackjon »

GannonFan wrote:
dbackjon wrote:
4) Where did I say that every road should be paved? No where. But moderately traveled roads should be
Well, you did say this :
dbackjon wrote:look for the requirement for ALL residental/traveled roads in the county to be paved in the near future
Even I wasn't really sure what you were getting at with that. "Moderately traveled roads" (pretty vague) still sounds different than "all residential/traveled roads".

I said COUNTY. As in Maricopa County, highly urbanized Maricopa County. And any residential Road would be moderately traveled, at least
:thumb:
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: EPA wants to regulate farm dust

Post by AZGrizFan »

dbackjon wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
Well, you did say this :


Even I wasn't really sure what you were getting at with that. "Moderately traveled roads" (pretty vague) still sounds different than "all residential/traveled roads".

I said COUNTY. As in Maricopa County, highly urbanized Maricopa County. And any residential Road would be moderately traveled, at least
You've been to my house, Jon. It's hardly what I'd call an "urban" area. Our roads ain't never gettin' paved...
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
Post Reply