Rob Iola wrote:Make it easier/cheaper for small business owners to grow their companies...
I also think it's bullshit that a business with 50 million in sales is considered small.

Rob Iola wrote:Make it easier/cheaper for small business owners to grow their companies...


Which is larger?houndawg wrote:Rob Iola wrote:Make it easier/cheaper for small business owners to grow their companies...I can tell you from personal experience that if you start a small business and play by the rules there will be nothing left to pay yourself with.
I also think it's bullshit that a business with 50 million in sales is considered small.


Your strawman dilemma comparing overreach and economic strangulation is bullsh!t! Republicans want clean air and water. Unlike donks, they have a concept of economics and don't feel compelled to to delay oil cleanups by months with regulatory and political overreach.kalm wrote:Does regulatory over-reach occurr? Of course.AZGrizFan wrote:
So, we regulate companies/industries into oblivion, then act surprised when they move their finances and labor offshore?
But quick, place a value for me on all of the regulations that increase your standard of living. Start with something like clean air or clean water and go on from there.
Those values seem to absent from conk calculations.

It's all about you, eh, howndawg? $50M is too big because you yourself could not make a $50k business successful? Since you failed to make the grade, you think we should regulate to the point of strangulation anyone bold enough, bright enough, hard-working enough, or savvy enough to do better than you?houndawg wrote:Rob Iola wrote:Make it easier/cheaper for small business owners to grow their companies...I can tell you from personal experience that if you start a small business and play by the rules there will be nothing left to pay yourself with.
I also think it's bullshit that a business with 50 million in sales is considered small.

I didn't say Republicans don't want clean air and water. They fail to recognize these things come at a cost - they struggle with the economics. Or are you one of those who think that polluters should regulate themselves?native wrote:Your strawman dilemma comparing overreach and economic strangulation is bullsh!t! Republicans want clean air and water. Unlike donks, they have a concept of economics and don't feel compelled to to delay oil cleanups by months with regulatory and political overreach.kalm wrote:
Does regulatory over-reach occurr? Of course.
But quick, place a value for me on all of the regulations that increase your standard of living. Start with something like clean air or clean water and go on from there.
Those values seem to absent from conk calculations.

Conks do measure the economics of quality of life. The EPA and ADA, for example, were created under conk administrations. It's the donks like Obama that ruin good regulations by politicizing them and loading them up with unnecessary job-killing BS.kalm wrote:I didn't say Republicans don't want clean air and water. They fail to recognize these things come at a cost - they struggle with the economics. Or are you one of those who think that polluters should regulate themselves?native wrote:
Your strawman dilemma comparing overreach and economic strangulation is bullsh!t! Republicans want clean air and water. Unlike donks, they have a concept of economics and don't feel compelled to to delay oil cleanups by months with regulatory and political overreach.

Fair enough.native wrote:Conks do measure the economics of quality of life. The EPA and ADA, for example, were created under conk administrations. It's the donks like Obama that ruin good regulations by politicizing them and loading them up with unnecessary job-killing BS.kalm wrote:
I didn't say Republicans don't want clean air and water. They fail to recognize these things come at a cost - they struggle with the economics. Or are you one of those who think that polluters should regulate themselves?

What do you think a business does when it's COGS goes up (either through onerous regulatory changes or increased labor costs)? It passes that cost on to the consumer.kalm wrote:Fair enough.native wrote:
Conks do measure the economics of quality of life. The EPA and ADA, for example, were created under conk administrations. It's the donks like Obama that ruin good regulations by politicizing them and loading them up with unnecessary job-killing BS.
But the meme that regulation is always bad and unneccessary or is not worth the restriction it places on business is extremely overblown. We are not entitled to a clean environment or cheap labor.


Or it's margins are reduced, or it cuts expenses, or it gets beat by a more efficient business.AZGrizFan wrote:What do you think a business does when it's COGS goes up (either through onerous regulatory changes or increased labor costs)? It passes that cost on to the consumer.kalm wrote:
Fair enough.
But the meme that regulation is always bad and unneccessary or is not worth the restriction it places on business is extremely overblown. We are not entitled to a clean environment or cheap labor.

All possibilities, to be sure...unless there's labor pressure across their industry...and wouldn't regulations affect every one?kalm wrote:Or it's margins are reduced, or it cuts expenses, or it gets beat by a more efficient business.AZGrizFan wrote:
What do you think a business does when it's COGS goes up (either through onerous regulatory changes or increased labor costs)? It passes that cost on to the consumer.

AZGrizFan wrote:Or it's margins are reduced, or it cuts expenses, or it gets beat by a more efficient business.kalm wrote:
What do you think a business does when it's COGS goes up (either through onerous regulatory changes or increased labor costs)? It passes that cost on to the consumer.

Exactly.From the class of 09 wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
Or it's margins are reduced, or it cuts expenses, or it gets beat by a more efficient business.
Or they outsource the labor


native wrote:It's all about you, eh, howndawg? $50M is too big because you yourself could not make a $50k business successful? Since you failed to make the grade, you think we should regulate to the point of strangulation anyone bold enough, bright enough, hard-working enough, or savvy enough to do better than you?houndawg wrote:
I can tell you from personal experience that if you start a small business and play by the rules there will be nothing left to pay yourself with.
I also think it's bullshit that a business with 50 million in sales is considered small.
This mindet of envy and justifiably low self esteem is the fundamental problem with donks and anarchists like dawg. They measure themselves and find the result wanting in hard work, character, abilities, productivity, etc.. Since they themselves won't (not "can't") hack it, so they are bound and determined to bring everybody else down to the lowest common denominator by any and all means necessary. To them, it's the only "fair" way to be.