93henfan wrote:
Yeah, the "big-time" cites its source as the original article in the PDN.

That was the "irony" in my post.
In reality though, I'd say it's a done deal for NUMEROUS reasons mentioned here. Look, Temple can't get big time schools to come play them for a multitude of reasons, so I am not dare pointing out Temple (nor should others) as an attendance comparison. Furthermore, there are people who love college football and absolutely wont be driving to Happy Valley from Philly to see Penn State. Give them the option of seeing 'Nova vs. Notre Dame...or 'Nova vs. BC....or 'Nova vs. Rutgers...and you can get people in the stands. Boston is a notoriously NON-COLLEGE sports town. BC students are jackasses and do not make the primary fan base of the 44,000 fans that fill Alumni Field on Saturdays. Yes, the Stadium is on campus...but again, the majority of seats (probably 38,000) go to non-students. IF BC CAN DO IT...so CAN 'Nova. And same from UCONN (Stadium is about 30-45 minutes from campus on a non-traffic day).
You add in "scheduling arrangements" for 'Nova hoops (we will come play you if you play us in football in Philly)...and you have more big name schools coming in. You not only would you get a nice Big East Schedule that would spur fan interest (including easy road trips for Rutgers fans)...but you likely will have some sort of scheduling arrangement with BYU, Notre Dame, Army, Navy, Boston College and other schools with east coast interests. Hell, it would not shock me to see Wisconsin, USC and other schools with NY, NJ and PA recruiting interests come out to play in 2 for 1's.
On pay day alone, Villanova will be able to build the program. Local fans of rival teams will fill the seats. And there is no doubt the teams I mentioned above would prefer to have an east coast game by playing a more than winnable "road game" in prime recruiting territory. Would you rather play Rutgers, Maryland, WVU, UConn, etc...for an East Coast "recruiting trip"...or newly promoted 'Nova.