2010 CSN GPI???

Football Championship Subdivision discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
Keenan
Level1
Level1
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:13 pm
I am a fan of: Liberty University
Location: Stephens City,VA

2010 CSN GPI???

Post by Keenan »

when will we see it?
Image
DBlue
Level1
Level1
Posts: 112
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 3:56 pm
I am a fan of: FCS
A.K.A.: Dblue

Re: 2010 CSN GPI???

Post by DBlue »

See This? X
User avatar
bluehenbillk
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7660
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
I am a fan of: elaware
Location: East Coast/Hawaii

Re: 2010 CSN GPI???

Post by bluehenbillk »

When Eric, the guy that now runs AGS called me for my birthday this summer, I told him if he wanted to get me a birthday present he could get rid of the BC, er i mean the cheap rip-off that is the GPI. It's like a Taliban fighter, riddled with so many holes in it, it's not worth it.

Then again, there is no outcry to have it so.....
Make Delaware Football Great Again
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: 2010 CSN GPI???

Post by 93henfan »

It's not the GPI, but if you want a site that's a compendium of all the various computer ranking systems and two human polls, there's Massey. They use The Sports Network Poll, The Coaches Poll, and 36 different computer rankings:

http://www.masseyratings.com/cf/compare1aa.htm
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
Keenan
Level1
Level1
Posts: 301
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:13 pm
I am a fan of: Liberty University
Location: Stephens City,VA

Re: 2010 CSN GPI???

Post by Keenan »

Link from 09/26/10

http://www.collegesportingnews.com/entr ... r-Playoffs" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
danefan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7989
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
I am a fan of: UAlbany
Location: Hudson Valley, New York

Re: 2010 CSN GPI???

Post by danefan »

Keenan wrote:Link from 09/26/10

http://www.collegesportingnews.com/entr ... r-Playoffs" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
They're still pulling lever and turning the dials trying to figure out a way to get the Ivy and Patriot Leagues ahead of the NEC and Big South...........its gonna be a while........... :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
danefan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7989
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
I am a fan of: UAlbany
Location: Hudson Valley, New York

Re: 2010 CSN GPI???

Post by danefan »

Here's the first release.....

http://www.collegesportingnews.com/cont ... x-Released" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

10/11/2010 GPI Top 25

1. Delaware (1.25)
2. Appalachian St (3.00)
3. James Madison (4.625)
4. Stephen F. Austin (4.75)
5. William & Mary (5.75)
T6. Montana St (6.625)
T6. Jacksonville St (6.625)
8. Massachusetts (7.125)
9. Eastern Washington (10.25)
10. Villanova (11.25)
T11. Wofford (13.625)
T11. Western Illinois (13.625)
13. Montana (13.75)
14. North Dakota State (14.500)
15. Cal Poly SLO (15.25)
16. Georgia Southern (19.625)
17. Northern Arizona (20.25)
18. Northern Iowa (20.375)
19. Southern Illinois (20.625)
20. Sacramento State (20.75)
T21. Southeast Missouri State (21.75)
T21. Chattanooga (21.75)
T23. Furman (23.625)
T23. South Carolina State (23.625)
25. Liberty (23.75)


Conference Ranking:
Rank, League, Total Average

1. Colonial Athletic Association (23.200)
2. Missouri Valley Football Conference (25.139)
3. Big Sky Conference (27.653)
4. Southern Conference (29.083)
5. Great West Conference (31.575)
6. Southland Conference (40.944)
7. Ohio Valley Conference (43.917)
8. Northeast Conference (53.121)
9. Big South Conference (57.544)
10. Southwestern Athletic Conference (59.025)
11. Ivy League (61.328)
12. Independents (62.813)
13. Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference (64.375)
14. Patriot League (66.964)
15. Pioneer Football League (71.838)
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: 2010 CSN GPI???

Post by 89Hen »

danefan wrote:Conference Ranking:
Rank, League, Total Average

1. Colonial Athletic Association (23.200)
2. Missouri Valley Football Conference (25.139)
3. Big Sky Conference (27.653)
Quite the departure from Sagarin. :|
Image
danefan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 7989
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:51 pm
I am a fan of: UAlbany
Location: Hudson Valley, New York

Re: 2010 CSN GPI???

Post by danefan »

Conference Ranking:
Rank, League, Total Average

1. Colonial Athletic Association (23.200)
2. Missouri Valley Football Conference (25.139)
3. Big Sky Conference (27.653)
4. Southern Conference (29.083)
5. Great West Conference (31.575)
6. Southland Conference (40.944)
7. Ohio Valley Conference (43.917)
8. Northeast Conference (53.121)
9. Big South Conference (57.544)
10. Southwestern Athletic Conference (59.025)
11. Ivy League (61.328)
12. Independents (62.813)
13. Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference (64.375)
14. Patriot League (66.964)
15. Pioneer Football League (71.838)


How about that for a year-to-year change?!?! :shock: :lol:
User avatar
Screamin_Eagle174
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 16619
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 12:33 pm
I am a fan of: Peaches
A.K.A.: SE174
Location: Spokanistan

Re: 2010 CSN GPI???

Post by Screamin_Eagle174 »

BIG SKY
MVFC

10/11/2010 GPI Top 25

1. Delaware (1.25)
2. Appalachian St (3.00)
3. James Madison (4.625)
4. Stephen F. Austin (4.75)
5. William & Mary (5.75)
T6. Montana St (6.625)
T6. Jacksonville St (6.625)
8. Massachusetts (7.125)
9. Eastern Washington (10.25)
10. Villanova (11.25)
T11. Wofford (13.625)
T11. Western Illinois (13.625)
13. Montana (13.75)
14. North Dakota State (14.500)
15. Cal Poly SLO (15.25)
16. Georgia Southern (19.625)
17. Northern Arizona (20.25)
18. Northern Iowa (20.375)
19. Southern Illinois (20.625)
20. Sacramento State (20.75)
T21. Southeast Missouri State (21.75)
T21. Chattanooga (21.75)
T23. Furman (23.625)
T23. South Carolina State (23.625)
25. Liberty (23.75)


Conference Ranking:
Rank, League, Total Average

1. Colonial Athletic Association (23.200)
2. Missouri Valley Football Conference (25.139)
3. Big Sky Conference (27.653)

4. Southern Conference (29.083)
5. Great West Conference (31.575)
6. Southland Conference (40.944)
7. Ohio Valley Conference (43.917)
8. Northeast Conference (53.121)
9. Big South Conference (57.544)
10. Southwestern Athletic Conference (59.025)
11. Ivy League (61.328)
12. Independents (62.813)
13. Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference (64.375)
14. Patriot League (66.964)
15. Pioneer Football League (71.838)


Now I understand the CAA ahead of the BSC, but I'd like to know how the MVFC is ranked higher than the BSC, using their rankings.

BSC= 5/9 ranked, two teams ranked higher than MVFC highest
MVFC= 4/9 ranked
BirdieJack
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 8:38 am
I am a fan of: SDSU
A.K.A.: Jackrabbits

Re: 2010 CSN GPI???

Post by BirdieJack »

Conference Ranking:[/b]
Rank, League, Total Average

1. Colonial Athletic Association (23.200)
2. Missouri Valley Football Conference (25.139)
3. Big Sky Conference (27.653)

4. Southern Conference (29.083)
5. Great West Conference (31.575)
6. Southland Conference (40.944)
7. Ohio Valley Conference (43.917)
8. Northeast Conference (53.121)
9. Big South Conference (57.544)
10. Southwestern Athletic Conference (59.025)
11. Ivy League (61.328)
12. Independents (62.813)
13. Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference (64.375)
14. Patriot League (66.964)
15. Pioneer Football League (71.838)


Now I understand the CAA ahead of the BSC, but I'd like to know how the MVFC is ranked higher than the BSC, using their rankings.

BSC= 5/9 ranked, two teams ranked higher than MVFC highest
MVFC= 4/9 ranked
MVFC - Outside the top 25
#28 - SDSU(strength of schedule)
#30 - MSU
#30 - YSU
#35 - ISU-Blue(THis is the biggest reason IMO)
#41 - ISU-Red

BSC - Outside the top 25
#26 - Portland State
#40 - Weber St.(usually much higher)
#61 - N. Colorado
#92- Idaho St.(where ISU-Blue usually has been lately)

My point of this is that the "bottom-half" of the MVFC is much more competive than the "bottom half" of the BSC. Hence the 2.51 percentage point higher/lower computer ranking, which is actually a lot.

Go Jacks!!
Post Reply