native wrote:BlueHen86 wrote:
True. And so what? There is a behavioral component to practicing ones religion. I'm more concerned about the guy who wants to blow me up than I am about the one who wants to blow me.
I thought that might be where you were going with this. Fine. Pursue it legislatively, not judicially. If DADT repeal passes, fine. If it fails, fine. DADT is a policy that has served the country, the military, and gay people well. Yes, gay people.
I share your concern for someone who is trying to blow me up, BlueHen86, but I do not share your professed enthusiasm for a
surprise blow job.
To me, it is not an either/or type of choice.
The military has let women serve for a while now, and I'm not aware that suprise blow jobs are a problem (or even an occurance
). I don't see where the behavioral component of sexuality is a problem for the military. Just becasue the guy next to me prefers the company of men doesn't mean that he will molest me at the first opportunity any more so than a heterosexual will molest a female when given the chance.
