Dem Has Just One Contributor From District...

[kalm]

What's sad is you think someone who ridicules conks is automatically a Democrat.

Let's see, I've never contributed to a campaign, I've voted for both parties in every election, and will vote for neither party in the upcoming one.

Let me ask you a question Z. Are you that serious a supporter of the Republican Party or is it the Democrats that really get you fired up?

I'm guessing it's the latter just like me with Republicans and what's really funny is that you and I probably agree on 90% of the issues.

Neither party, eh? So are you going the Libertarian route, kalm, or will it be The Rent Is Too Damn High Party?

Libertarian, Green, Constitutionist, Socialist, Rent is Too Damn High - I'll spread the love.

[AZGrizFan]

What's even more hysterically funny is that we get the impression you actually believe you're an "independent".

What's sad is you think someone who ridicules conks is automatically a Democrat.

Let's see, I've never contributed to a campaign, I've voted for both parties in every election, and will vote for neither party in the upcoming one.

Let me ask you a question Z. Are you that serious a supporter of the Republican Party or is it the Democrats that really get you fired up?

I'm guessing it's the latter just like me with Republicans and what's really funny is that you and I probably agree on 90% of the issues.

You spend 95% of your posts ridiculing conks and defending donk policies. The threads you start vastly lean liberal. YOU may have yourself convinced that you're an "independent", but believe me it's plainly obvious by your posts here that you're not.

i disagree with MANY conk policies----most having to do with cramming someone elses's morals down my throat (gay marriage, abortion rights, etc., etc). But you are right, what REALLY fires me up is Donk fiscal policies and entitlement mentality---welfare, food stamps, extended unemployment, etc., etc., and the mentality that MORE government is BETTER government, that the government is here to SAVE you and TAKE CARE of you (see Katrina, New Orleans, for exhibit A).

And you're right. We probably DO agree on 90%. Apparently THAT 90% is never discussed here though.

[kalm]

What's sad is you think someone who ridicules conks is automatically a Democrat.

Let's see, I've never contributed to a campaign, I've voted for both parties in every election, and will vote for neither party in the upcoming one.

Let me ask you a question Z. Are you that serious a supporter of the Republican Party or is it the Democrats that really get you fired up?

I'm guessing it's the latter just like me with Republicans and what's really funny is that you and I probably agree on 90% of the issues.

You spend 95% of your posts ridiculing conks and defending donk policies. The threads you start vastly lean liberal. YOU may have yourself convinced that you're an "independent", but believe me it's plainly obvious by your posts here that you're not.

i disagree with MANY conk policies----most having to do with cramming someone elses's morals down my throat (gay marriage, abortion rights, etc., etc). But you are right, what REALLY fires me up is Donk fiscal policies and entitlement mentality---welfare, food stamps, extended unemployment, etc., etc., and the mentality that MORE government is BETTER government, that the government is here to SAVE you and TAKE CARE of you (see Katrina, New Orleans, for exhibit A).

And you're right. We probably DO agree on 90%. Apparently THAT 90% is never discussed here though.

Come on Z, we're all independent, self sufficient, limited government folks here. That is, until we need to go kick some terrorist ass, or face an economic collapse, or need a new bridge built, or an educated workforce, or contract dispute litigated, or safe drugs, or untainted meat...

At least I'm independent enough to be more concerned with effective government than the size.

[native]

You spend 95% of your posts ridiculing conks and defending donk policies. The threads you start vastly lean liberal. YOU may have yourself convinced that you're an "independent", but believe me it's plainly obvious by your posts here that you're not.

i disagree with MANY conk policies----most having to do with cramming someone elses's morals down my throat (gay marriage, abortion rights, etc., etc). But you are right, what REALLY fires me up is Donk fiscal policies and entitlement mentality---welfare, food stamps, extended unemployment, etc., etc., and the mentality that MORE government is BETTER government, that the government is here to SAVE you and TAKE CARE of you (see Katrina, New Orleans, for exhibit A).

And you're right. We probably DO agree on 90%. Apparently THAT 90% is never discussed here though.

Come on Z, we're all independent, self sufficient, limited government folks here. That is, until we need to go kick some terrorist ass, or face an economic collapse, or need a new bridge built, or an educated workforce, or contract dispute litigated, or safe drugs, or untainted meat...

At least I'm independent enough to be more concerned with effective government than the size.

Both considerations are equally important.

[travelinman67]

Come on Z, we're all independent, self sufficient, limited government folks here. That is, until we need to go kick some terrorist ass, or face an economic collapse, or need a new bridge built, or an educated workforce, or contract dispute litigated, or safe drugs, or untainted meat...

At least I'm independent enough to be more concerned with effective government than the size.

Incorrect. The "effective, not size" line was Obama's and Pelosi's attempt to divert attention.

Kalm, you DO NOT KNOW what you support, you simply like to debate conservatives, regardless the topic.

The Obama agenda has been an unequivocal failure, and in 10 days, we'll put an end to it.

[kalm]

Come on Z, we're all independent, self sufficient, limited government folks here. That is, until we need to go kick some terrorist ass, or face an economic collapse, or need a new bridge built, or an educated workforce, or contract dispute litigated, or safe drugs, or untainted meat...

At least I'm independent enough to be more concerned with effective government than the size.

Incorrect. The "effective, not size" line was Obama's and Pelosi's attempt to divert attention.

Kalm, you DO NOT KNOW what you support, you simply like to debate conservatives, regardless the topic.

The Obama agenda has been an unequivocal failure, and in 10 days, we'll put an end to it.

Unlike you, I don't follow Obama and Pelosi enough to know that was one of their lines!

I support policies that build the American Middle Class - probably because that's what I grew up in, and that's who my customers are.

But you're right, I do like debating conservatives.

[Cap'n Cat]

Come on Z, we're all independent, self sufficient, limited government folks here. That is, until we need to go kick some terrorist ass, or face an economic collapse, or need a new bridge built, or an educated workforce, or contract dispute litigated, or safe drugs, or untainted meat...

At least I'm independent enough to be more concerned with effective government than the size.

Incorrect. The "effective, not size" line was Obama's and Pelosi's attempt to divert attention.

Kalm, you DO NOT KNOW what you support, you simply like to debate conservatives, regardless the topic.

The Obama agenda has been an unequivocal failure, and in 10 days, we'll put an end to it.

The difference between the Obama "agenda" and that of any President is miniscule. Nothing really changes, boys, so these debates are just stupid dick-measuring contests.

[AZGrizFan]

Come on Z, we're all independent, self sufficient, limited government folks here.

You don't read much kyjelly, mainejeff, Cap'n Cat, or their ilk then, do you?

[AZGrizFan]

Incorrect. The "effective, not size" line was Obama's and Pelosi's attempt to divert attention.

Kalm, you DO NOT KNOW what you support, you simply like to debate conservatives, regardless the topic.

The Obama agenda has been an unequivocal failure, and in 10 days, we'll put an end to it.

The difference between the Obama "agenda" and that of any President is miniscule. Nothing really changes, boys, so these debates are just stupid dick-measuring contests.

Unfortunately he was elected because that wasn't supposed to be the case. SUCKERS!!!!!

[Cap'n Cat]

Come on Z, we're all independent, self sufficient, limited government folks here.

You don't read much kyjelly, mainejeff, Cap'n Cat, or their ilk then, do you?

Nor do you, apparently, b*tch. No one WANTS big government, Myron. We want efficient government, same as you. We jsut differ on where the knife needs to cut. Your gross generalizations hurt your message, Z.