Would things be different if this was a Hillary Clinton presidency?
Try to be reasonable in your responses, Conks. You don't help by being fvcking apes.






89Hen wrote:I don't think there would be much difference. Pelosi and Reid were doing the driving, BO is just the car.



GannonFan wrote:I'm from the other angle - being an Obama supporter, but I think it's a good question.
IMO, the biggest problem Obama had was not knowing how to deal with the strong personalities in Congress (namely Pelosi and Reid) and letting them dictate the direction of his Presidency. They pretty much determined what bills were going to be worked on in what order and in what fashion. Obama, in many ways, was reduced to a cheerleader role. He didn't know how to interject himself into the agenda, and the supermajority was probably the single worse thing for him as they didn't need him to help win support for what they wanted to do.
Hillary, on the other hand, had a good two decades worth of exposure to how Washington worked and I don't think for a second that she would've been as cowed as Obama was to the machinations of Congress. She would've set the agenda and she would've determined that the economy should have been the single most focus for the first year or so. And I don't see how she would've jumped right into health care at all, considering her history.
So yeah, I think a Hillary Presidency would've looked a lot different and I wouldn't doubt that the GOP would have far less seats today in Congress, and very well wouldn't have a majority in the House, if Hillary was in the White House.


I totally agree with this.GannonFan wrote:I'm from the other angle - being an Obama supporter, but I think it's a good question.
IMO, the biggest problem Obama had was not knowing how to deal with the strong personalities in Congress (namely Pelosi and Reid) and letting them dictate the direction of his Presidency. They pretty much determined what bills were going to be worked on in what order and in what fashion. Obama, in many ways, was reduced to a cheerleader role. He didn't know how to interject himself into the agenda, and the supermajority was probably the single worse thing for him as they didn't need him to help win support for what they wanted to do.
Hillary, on the other hand, had a good two decades worth of exposure to how Washington worked and I don't think for a second that she would've been as cowed as Obama was to the machinations of Congress. She would've set the agenda and she would've determined that the economy should have been the single most focus for the first year or so. And I don't see how she would've jumped right into health care at all, considering her history.
So yeah, I think a Hillary Presidency would've looked a lot different and I wouldn't doubt that the GOP would have far less seats today in Congress, and very well wouldn't have a majority in the House, if Hillary was in the White House.


TheDancinMonarch wrote:We opponents would be sexists instead of racists.


Wow. I agree with you. I'm confused. I think I should rethink my position now.89Hen wrote:I don't think there would be much difference. Pelosi and Reid were doing the driving, BO is just the car.

Hillary would have governed more from the center, and Democrats would still have lost seats this time around, but it would not have been the bloodbath that it was.Cap'n Cat wrote:I was a Hillary supporter over Barack Obama for the "experience" thing and I wish she woulda won. I'm going to support Obama through the next six years of his presidency, but, have been wondering.....
Would things be different if this was a Hillary Clinton presidency?
Try to be reasonable in your responses, Conks. You don't help by being fvcking apes.

It's ok. You'll find as you get older it'll begin happening more and more.Skjellyfetti wrote:Wow. I agree with you. I'm confused. I think I should rethink my position now.89Hen wrote:I don't think there would be much difference. Pelosi and Reid were doing the driving, BO is just the car.


AZGrizFan wrote:It's ok. You'll find as you get older it'll begin happening more and more.Skjellyfetti wrote:
Wow. I agree with you. I'm confused. I think I should rethink my position now.![]()

What about Liberals? I have yet to meet a progressive.Cap'n Cat wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
It's ok. You'll find as you get older it'll begin happening more and more.![]()
More for Conks, less for Progressives.



Your inner circle is filled with Catholics and mortgage bankers. Of course you've never met a Progressive, Hen.89Hen wrote:What about Liberals? I have yet to meet a progressive.Cap'n Cat wrote:
More for Conks, less for Progressives.![]()

I'm talking about here Cat. Your ideas are older than Robert Byrd... oh wait, he's dead... much like your ideas.Cap'n Cat wrote:Your inner circle is filled with Catholics and mortgage bankers. Of course you've never met a Progressive, Hen.


89Hen wrote:I'm talking about here Cat. Your ideas are older than Robert Byrd... oh wait, he's dead... much like your ideas.Cap'n Cat wrote:Your inner circle is filled with Catholics and mortgage bankers. Of course you've never met a Progressive, Hen.


Except I separate religion and politics.Cap'n Cat wrote:89Hen wrote: I'm talking about here Cat. Your ideas are older than Robert Byrd... oh wait, he's dead... much like your ideas.
Old ideas? You're talking about old ideas?
[img]jesus.jpg[/img]




89Hen wrote:Except I separate religion and politics.Cap'n Cat wrote:
Old ideas? You're talking about old ideas?
[img]jesus.jpg[/img]

Laugh all you want fat boy, doesn't change the fact that you can't show a single instance where I've mixed the two. Half the people in my church are Dems, half are Reps.Cap'n Cat wrote:89Hen wrote: Except I separate religion and politics.


Even if I even WANTED to devote a half hour to YOU on this board researching it, I wouldn't. You've done it and you know you have, your Holiness.89Hen wrote:Laugh all you want fat boy, doesn't change the fact that you can't show a single instance where I've mixed the two. Half the people in my church are Dems, half are Reps.Cap'n Cat wrote:

Nope. You could spend half a month looking and you're not gonna find it.Cap'n Cat wrote:Even if I even WANTED to devote a half hour to YOU on this board researching it, I wouldn't. You've done it and you know you have, your Holiness.


89Hen wrote:Nope. You could spend half a month looking and you're not gonna find it.Cap'n Cat wrote:Even if I even WANTED to devote a half hour to YOU on this board researching it, I wouldn't. You've done it and you know you have, your Holiness.