That's NEVER been the argument. The argument has been it's no worse for you than >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>89Hen wrote:The legalize it crowd has always used the "it's not bad for you" arguement. This is a blow to that.Skjellyfetti wrote:Didn't except T-man to be an advocate for the nanny state.
Just because something is bad for you, doesn't mean it should be illegal.
What's next, T-man? Fatty foods? Alcohol? High sodium foods? Time limits on television and computer?
Fill in your own blanks










