Man, I dunno.dbackjon wrote:Reeduction camps are prison-like facilities run by Fundamentalists. Parents send the children that have either been suspected on being gay, or have come out as gay. These camps try to reeducate the kids into not being gay. Every bit as traumatic as rape.andy7171 wrote: what in the hell?
What exactly is this re-education camp? And is the Government forcing this upon them?
Purplicious doesn't mean he's gay. Now if he brought home Pinkalicious ...93henfan wrote:I gotta be honest. I gave my son some money for the kindergarten book fair last week and he brought home a book called Purplicious. This was the first time I ever considered beating the gay out of my son, but I let it slide this time.dbackjon wrote: The type of parent that tries to beat the gay out of a kid.
Hold on, hold on.....are you telling me you CAN'T beat the "gay" out a person?dbackjon wrote:The type of parent that tries to beat the gay out of a kid.
Oh boy... 
...now I know why Citdog was pissed.....Yeah, it's a friggin' series.andy7171 wrote:Purplicious doesn't mean he's gay. Now if he brought home Pinkalicious ...93henfan wrote:
I gotta be honest. I gave my son some money for the kindergarten book fair last week and he brought home a book called Purplicious. This was the first time I ever considered beating the gay out of my son, but I let it slide this time.
So, if a guy on an FCS football message board gets it, why is it so fucking complicated for these Ivy-league educated lawyers/judges?Appaholic wrote:nailed it...LeadBolt wrote:The issue here isn't about religious freedom or establishment of a state religion by refusing to consider Sharia law, but in deed just the opposite. If courts overturn civil and/or criminal state and/or federal law in favor of Sharia or any other religious law, they are in fact establishing Islam (in the case of Sharia law) as a religion superior to the state, thus a state religion.
As courts have overturned bigamy in the law/scripture/practice of other religions in favor of state laws that conflict with this practice, so should they overturn Sharia law in conflict with state or federal law.
This is about establishing Islamic law as superior to state law, not protecting the rights of practitioners of Islam.
I have Pinkalicious, Purpalicious and Goldalicous almost memorized. But I have girls.93henfan wrote:Yeah, it's a friggin' series.andy7171 wrote: Purplicious doesn't mean he's gay. Now if he brought home Pinkalicious ...
Which I hope he never gets interested in.
Or there will be some Sharia Law going on.
God damn. I'm sorry man.andy7171 wrote:I have Pinkalicious, Purpalicious and Goldalicous almost memorized. But I have girls.93henfan wrote:
Yeah, it's a friggin' series.
Which I hope he never gets interested in.
Or there will be some Sharia Law going on.
Because the Ivy league law schools teach you to be so abstract about everything you forget the reality of the situation.AZGrizFan wrote:So, if a guy on an FCS football message board gets it, why is it so fucking complicated for these Ivy-league educated lawyers/judges?Appaholic wrote:
nailed it...
So you're saying it might lead you to continue discussing your football team when they don't even participate in the playoffs?danefan wrote:Because the Ivy league law schools teach you to be so abstract about everything you forget the reality of the situation.AZGrizFan wrote:
So, if a guy on an FCS football message board gets it, why is it so fucking complicated for these Ivy-league educated lawyers/judges?
93henfan wrote:So you're saying it might lead you to continue discussing your football team when they don't even participate in the playoffs?danefan wrote:
Because the Ivy league law schools teach you to be so abstract about everything you forget the reality of the situation.
Too little...too late.danefan wrote:BTW, before I get slammed by IT, my above statement is a complete generalization by a me (a guy who did not go to an Ivy law school).
Its based solely on my own interaction with many very brilliant, but practically ineffective, Ivy-league educated lawyers.
Take that for what's it worth.
AZGrizFan wrote:Too little...too late.danefan wrote:BTW, before I get slammed by IT, my above statement is a complete generalization by a me (a guy who did not go to an Ivy law school).
Its based solely on my own interaction with many very brilliant, but practically ineffective, Ivy-league educated lawyers.
Take that for what's it worth.
It was worth a shot. Because the Ivy League has been in a bubble for the past 150 years?AZGrizFan wrote:So, if a guy on an FCS football message board gets it, why is it so **** complicated for these Ivy-league educated lawyers/judges?Appaholic wrote:
nailed it...
