JoltinJoe wrote:Hah! Look at the fans of all the losers attacking the fan of the team with the most wins ever.![]()
Losers hate the winners in America. Music to my ears.
Peasants. You can all eat cake.
And you can eat c0ck, you yankee-doodle-douchebag.

JoltinJoe wrote:Hah! Look at the fans of all the losers attacking the fan of the team with the most wins ever.![]()
Losers hate the winners in America. Music to my ears.
Peasants. You can all eat cake.
Grizalltheway wrote:JoltinJoe wrote:Hah! Look at the fans of all the losers attacking the fan of the team with the most wins ever.![]()
Losers hate the winners in America. Music to my ears.
Peasants. You can all eat cake.
And you can eat c0ck, you yankee-doodle-douchebag.![]()

I'm confused. So you're saying that all inhabitants of Philadelphia are female horses?CatMom wrote: As for the name Philly - it's not Filly, dipshit. It's Phillies - as in residents or inhabitants of Philadelphia. You'll try anything.

What does CatMom have to do with whiny Yankee fans?Gil Dobie wrote:Where have you gone, Joe DiMaggio
A nation turns its lonely eyes to you (Woo, woo, woo)
What's that you say, Mrs. Robinson
Joltin' Joe has left and gone away

And all the inhabitants of New York are horses' arses.JoltinJoe wrote:I'm confused. So you're saying that all inhabitants of Philadelphia are female horses?CatMom wrote: As for the name Philly - it's not Filly, dipshit. It's Phillies - as in residents or inhabitants of Philadelphia. You'll try anything.


JoltinJoe wrote:I'm confused. So you're saying that all inhabitants of Philadelphia are female horses?CatMom wrote: As for the name Philly - it's not Filly, dipshit. It's Phillies - as in residents or inhabitants of Philadelphia. You'll try anything.
dbackjon wrote:JoltinJoe wrote:
I'm confused. So you're saying that all inhabitants of Philadelphia are female horses?
No, but inhabitants of New York are female dogs

just the ones born here.89Hen wrote:And all the inhabitants of New York are horses' arses.JoltinJoe wrote:
I'm confused. So you're saying that all inhabitants of Philadelphia are female horses?

apparently you have trouble with homonyms too. (I didn't say homosexuals - I'm sure you have no trouble there)JoltinJoe wrote:I'm confused. So you're saying that all inhabitants of Philadelphia are female horses?CatMom wrote: As for the name Philly - it's not Filly, dipshit. It's Phillies - as in residents or inhabitants of Philadelphia. You'll try anything.



If I ever get out of Minny, I'll be going to a lot of A's and Giants gamesSilenoz wrote:Oakland A's
I dunno, the threepeat in the '70s probably. All 9 of their titles were before my time
Also, to no-one's surprise, I appear to be the only Oakland fan here


Just look at that...no yankmes titles in that timeframe. I do remember all this and it was great to have NY on the outside looking in.TwinTownBisonFan wrote:so how long is it before the league bans Hank and Hal so Ca$hman can restock the teams farm system with talent and they can bring along a new "core 4" without trading them to Kansas City or Oakland?
i mean - i'm all for the brothers to be like their father was in the early 80's - pissing away talent and pursuing big names who wouldn't fit and being okay - but not real contenders... baseball in the 80's and early 90's was at it's best - in a period of 16 years 13 different teams won the series - the only repeats being the Dodgers, Twins and Jays
1979: Pirates
1980: Phillies
1981: Dodgers
1982: Cardinals
1983: Orioles
1984: Tigers
1985: Royals
1986: Mets
1987: Twins
1988: Dodgers
1989: A's
1990: Reds
1991: Twins
1992: Jays
1993: Jays
1994: Expos (well okay, no... but it was either them or Cleveland)
1995: Braves
THAT was good for baseball...