D1B wrote:Then your god is worst murderer in history. Majority of pregnancies end up aborted by god.
Yup. You heard it hear first...D1B, Graduate of the Global Warming School of Research, informs all that "the majority" (that means "most") of all pregnancies are aborted by God. Dataset? or...
D1B wrote:YOUR god performs abortions on an industrial scale. What are we going to do about it?
The only one performing abortions on an "industrial scale" are the murderers conducting assembly-line abortions at the clinics whose atrocities are so heinous, there is a specific class of medical malpractice law to handle the extreme frequency of occurrance. I would challenge you to find a post operative survey result that shows more victims who felt the procedure was "what they expected" or better, than victims who felt the procedure and outcome was "unsatisfactory".
D1B wrote:
One answer would be not to ban it. It's a women's health issue. Child bearing enslaves them and subjects them to dependence on fools like you and Tman.
This is good...you gotta be drunk...
First, the overwhelming majority of women have abortions for elective reasons, i.e., they don't want to disrupt their lifestyle,
NOT FOR HEALTH REASONS.
http://www.pregnantpause.org/numbers/whyabort.htm
Second, child bearing only enslaves women who would be dumb enough to hook up with someone as irresponsible as yourself. Name calling; inability to control their temper; drug and alcohol dependencies; basically someone who has underachieved and now "takes out their self-hate" by redirecting towards others? Really, be honest with yourself. I can't imagine any other poster on these boards who more closely matches the profile of the stereotypical wife-beater.
As for myself...to save your wasted effort attempting to attack my credibility, I am still close friends with both of my ex-wives, having drinks with my first ex on a frequent basis (just last weekend, in fact), and as of a few weeks ago, was advised by my second wife she is filing for divorce from her current husband and would like to try and "work things out" and get back together. I'll bet you a small house in northern CA that if you ask either of them, they'd tell you our having children IN NO WAY induced a feeling or fear of subjugation or loss of identity or empowerment. I'll also wager AZGriz's house on his behalf, that if you asked the world famous Mrs. AZGriz, she'd also confirm having children did not diminish her or place her in fear of being "subjected" by her husband (...come to think of it, it's possible that AZGriz was in fear of being subjected...naw...probably shouldn't go there...
). So, you can give up trying to attack those who still have their heads screwed on and understand that murdering children for the sake of convenience or to "get back" at the father, is amoral and logically indefensible: Most understand a relationship is a continuous demonstration of altruism and sacrifice, but that altruism is always a two way street...and that's one requirement of a healthy relationship regardless of any other mutually agreed upon dynamic. If you have to be asked to give of yourself, you don't have a relationship.
In 90+ percent of all infanticide, "abortion" is merely a method whereby a small percentage of women with f(ked up values get to hurt the child's father via proxy murder. Period.
