http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.co ... to-del.php
This ought to be really good..



Bullshit. Palin, the poster child for your argument above, is a fucking lunatic profiteer.blueballs wrote:It SHOULD be good... I look forward to Rep. Bachmann reminding the sheeple that "investment" as it will be used by Mr. Obama tonight is still mostly unnecessary (deficit) government spending and the redistribution of wealth for political gain, and it will be interesting to see how much of that "investment" is "investment" that will benefit labor unions.
Remember folks, nothing scares and infuriates the left more than a strong, successful, conservative woman or other minority. The left will never debate such a conservative minority person on issues, but instead will resort to name calling or personal attacks to attempt to marginalize the messenger while ignoring the issue- as the title of this thread so aptly demonstrates.

I find it tough to like strong, successful, liberal women too. I'm an equal opportunity misogynist.blueballs wrote:It SHOULD be good... I look forward to Rep. Bachmann reminding the sheeple that "investment" as it will be used by Mr. Obama tonight is still mostly unnecessary (deficit) government spending and the redistribution of wealth for political gain, and it will be interesting to see how much of that "investment" is "investment" that will benefit labor unions.
Remember folks, nothing scares and infuriates the left more than a strong, successful, conservative woman or other minority. The left will never debate such a conservative minority person on issues, but instead will resort to name calling or personal attacks to attempt to marginalize the messenger while ignoring the issue- as the title of this thread so aptly demonstrates.




Hilary Clinton, anyone? Hell, conk fucks couldn't even manage to lay off of Chelsea.blueballs wrote:It SHOULD be good... I look forward to Rep. Bachmann reminding the sheeple that "investment" as it will be used by Mr. Obama tonight is still mostly unnecessary (deficit) government spending and the redistribution of wealth for political gain, and it will be interesting to see how much of that "investment" is "investment" that will benefit labor unions.
Remember folks, nothing scares and infuriates the left more than a strong, successful, conservative woman or other minority. The left will never debate such a conservative minority person on issues, but instead will resort to name calling or personal attacks to attempt to marginalize the messenger while ignoring the issue- as the title of this thread so aptly demonstrates.

blueballs gets schooled again by GATWGrizalltheway wrote:Hilary Clinton, anyone? Hell, conk fucks couldn't even manage to lay off of Chelsea.blueballs wrote:It SHOULD be good... I look forward to Rep. Bachmann reminding the sheeple that "investment" as it will be used by Mr. Obama tonight is still mostly unnecessary (deficit) government spending and the redistribution of wealth for political gain, and it will be interesting to see how much of that "investment" is "investment" that will benefit labor unions.
Remember folks, nothing scares and infuriates the left more than a strong, successful, conservative woman or other minority. The left will never debate such a conservative minority person on issues, but instead will resort to name calling or personal attacks to attempt to marginalize the messenger while ignoring the issue- as the title of this thread so aptly demonstrates.

Hillary Clinton is a conservative? Hmmm, didn't know that.dbackjon wrote:blueballs gets schooled again by GATWGrizalltheway wrote:
Hilary Clinton, anyone? Hell, conk fucks couldn't even manage to lay off of Chelsea.



Please elaborate... I illustrate a phenomenom that occurs daily in the media and blogosphere, and GATW points out how the Clinton women were scraped by some on the right (and in 2008 in her own party too). How is that schooling and how does that refute or change anything I posted?dbackjon wrote:blueballs gets schooled again by GATWGrizalltheway wrote:
Hilary Clinton, anyone? Hell, conk fucks couldn't even manage to lay off of Chelsea.
Grizalltheway wrote:89![]()
blueballs wrote:Please elaborate... I illustrate a phenomenom that occurs daily in the media and blogosphere, and GATW points out how the Clinton women were scraped by some on the right (and in 2008 in her own party too). How is that schooling and how does that refute or change anything I posted?dbackjon wrote:
blueballs gets schooled again by GATW

Bingo.D1B wrote:blueballs wrote:
Please elaborate... I illustrate a phenomenom that occurs daily in the media and blogosphere, and GATW points out how the Clinton women were scraped by some on the right (and in 2008 in her own party too). How is that schooling and how does that refute or change anything I posted?
It doesn't BB, but you conks, in an effort distance yourselves from the white old guys club rep, have handpicked a gaggle of patently moronic women, some fucking crazy, to carry the torch.
I think I speak for every fucking liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

D1B wrote:blueballs wrote:
Please elaborate... I illustrate a phenomenom that occurs daily in the media and blogosphere, and GATW points out how the Clinton women were scraped by some on the right (and in 2008 in her own party too). How is that schooling and how does that refute or change anything I posted?
It doesn't BB, but you conks, in an effort to distance yourselves from the white old guys club rep, have handpicked a gaggle of patently moronic women, some **** crazy, to carry the torch.
I think I speak for every **** liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

Bullshit.D1B wrote:I think I speak for every fucking liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.

But you, poundpuppy, barebackjon, and other Donk sycophants on this forum lick the boots of a anti gay marriage fiscally irresponsible empty suit of a president.D1B wrote:blueballs wrote:
Please elaborate... I illustrate a phenomenom that occurs daily in the media and blogosphere, and GATW points out how the Clinton women were scraped by some on the right (and in 2008 in her own party too). How is that schooling and how does that refute or change anything I posted?
It doesn't BB, but you conks, in an effort to distance yourselves from the white old guys club rep, have handpicked a gaggle of patently moronic women, some fucking crazy, to carry the torch.
I think I speak for every fucking liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.
What does this have to do with my statement? Try to stay on topic Baldy.Baldy wrote:But you, poundpuppy, barebackjon, and other Donk sycophants on this forum lick the boots of a anti gay marriage fiscally irresponsible empty suit of a president.D1B wrote:
It doesn't BB, but you conks, in an effort to distance yourselves from the white old guys club rep, have handpicked a gaggle of patently moronic women, some fucking crazy, to carry the torch.
I think I speak for every fucking liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.![]()
The spin cycle is outta control today.

Baldy wrote:But you, poundpuppy, barebackjon, and other Donk sycophants on this forum lick the boots of a anti gay marriage fiscally irresponsible empty suit of a president.D1B wrote:
It doesn't BB, but you conks, in an effort to distance yourselves from the white old guys club rep, have handpicked a gaggle of patently moronic women, some **** crazy, to carry the torch.
I think I speak for every **** liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.![]()
The spin cycle is outta control today.
You'd like it to be Hen, but unlike you and the other automatons here with their fists up Ayn Rands aynus, we're not willing to give up our freedoms, civil rights and natural environment for a suit who just want's to gut goverment to save everyone a nickel.89Hen wrote:Bullshit.D1B wrote:I think I speak for every fucking liberal here when I say I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.
D1B wrote:What does this have to do with my statement? Try to stay on topic Baldy.Baldy wrote: But you, poundpuppy, barebackjon, and other Donk sycophants on this forum lick the boots of a anti gay marriage fiscally irresponsible empty suit of a president.![]()
The spin cycle is outta control today.
Oh, you know as good as I that my comment was very much on topic.D1B wrote:I will support any man or woman who will run on a social moderate/fiscal conservative platform - with no bullshit. Republican or Democrat.
So is Bernie Sanders, old man.houndawg wrote:Baldy wrote: But you, poundpuppy, barebackjon, and other Donk sycophants on this forum lick the boots of a anti gay marriage fiscally irresponsible empty suit of a president.![]()
The spin cycle is outta control today.
Sorry, Moldy, independent since 1972.
