Breaking news, as I have kind of understood it, on the tube, a few minutes ago, while headed to bed..
Discuss....


Better yet, an early link!!Wedgebuster wrote:Looks like we are in, with our UN buddies, no fly zone, and more...
Breaking news, as I have kind of understood it, on the tube, a few minutes ago, while headed to bed..
Discuss....

The UN immediately followed with a, "that 'no fly zone' shit don't fly" zone over Bahrain and Saudi Arabia.Wedgebuster wrote:Better yet, an early link!!Wedgebuster wrote:Looks like we are in, with our UN buddies, no fly zone, and more...
Breaking news, as I have kind of understood it, on the tube, a few minutes ago, while headed to bed..
Discuss....
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-E ... -zone-vote



This. No point in doing anything now. This was/is just another lose-lose situation in the ME for USA. We don't go in, Arabs bitch about America standing by and doing nothing about this dictator. We go in, Arabs bitch about us interfering in their affairs.GannonFan wrote:Well, likely too little too late though. He doesn't really need the aerial bombardment anymore since the rebel holdings are few and far between now, and it's not like his forces are walking around wearing "I work for Qadaffi" berets so that they'll be easy to hit from the air. Maybe if they decided on this a week ago it could've done some good. Unfortunately, it looks like it will be one of those, "gee, we really, really tried, but the bad man was just too strong - oh, and we're buying a lot of his oil again" things.

which is why i think this is the only way to make it work. this isn't being initiated by the US... it's being led by the arab world and the europeans... as it should be. i'm starting to think this is as good a play as any in this situation - we aren't imposing our will on the situation - we're in the background on this one - letting others take the initiative. our national interests are in a democratic libya, however - acting in any way to secure such a thing would (much like in egypt) undermine any democratic regime to emerge...SDHornet wrote:This. No point in doing anything now. This was/is just another lose-lose situation in the ME for USA. We don't go in, Arabs bitch about America standing by and doing nothing about this dictator. We go in, Arabs bitch about us interfering in their affairs.GannonFan wrote:Well, likely too little too late though. He doesn't really need the aerial bombardment anymore since the rebel holdings are few and far between now, and it's not like his forces are walking around wearing "I work for Qadaffi" berets so that they'll be easy to hit from the air. Maybe if they decided on this a week ago it could've done some good. Unfortunately, it looks like it will be one of those, "gee, we really, really tried, but the bad man was just too strong - oh, and we're buying a lot of his oil again" things.



you realize the french, british and italians have air forces, don't you?CID1990 wrote:What a joke.
What UN-affiliated military power is capable of enforcing a no-fly zone in Libya?
Here's a hint: there's only one.
All others will provide token assistance, like allowing us to tie up a ship or two in this port or that port. Maybe refuel a destroyer or two in Italy. Pakistan will provide 6 trucks.


Maybe the same countries that helped us enforce a no-fly zone over Iraq for 10+ years?CID1990 wrote:
What UN-affiliated military power is capable of enforcing a no-fly zone in Libya?

I'm with ya - I think by "UN involvement" it means "98% US enforcement".CID1990 wrote:What a joke.
What UN-affiliated military power is capable of enforcing a no-fly zone in Libya?
Here's a hint: there's only one.
All others will provide token assistance, like allowing us to tie up a ship or two in this port or that port. Maybe refuel a destroyer or two in Italy. Pakistan will provide 6 trucks.
Maybe they should try dusting it off and using it.houndawg wrote:Saudi Arabia has some nice gear.

Which is fine as long as ground forces are easily identifiable. Heck, the reason we started bombing sites in Serbia was that we couldn't properly identify forces in Kosovo. It's not like each sides picks a color and then wears that color to make identification easier.kalm wrote:They've also authorized airstrikes against ground forces.


Ghaddafi has ordered a halt to military operations.LeadBolt wrote:I agree that this is a no win situation for the USA. Let the UN impose their will without us for a change. It is too little, too late and not something we should have been involved in to begin with. I'm not sure what Obama thought was going to happen when he moved a ship and 400 marines off their coast in the first place. Either go in to win, which we can't or stay out, which we should.




Like the Chinese embassy...GannonFan wrote:Which is fine as long as ground forces are easily identifiable. Heck, the reason we started bombing sites in Serbia was that we couldn't properly identify forces in Kosovo. It's not like each sides picks a color and then wears that color to make identification easier.kalm wrote:They've also authorized airstrikes against ground forces.

Singular. Britain.Skjellyfetti wrote:Maybe the same countries that helped us enforce a no-fly zone over Iraq for 10+ years?CID1990 wrote:
What UN-affiliated military power is capable of enforcing a no-fly zone in Libya?


Pretty shrewd move by Q. It kind of pulls the rug from under the UN. He assumes that the UN won't have the stamina or will to enforce a NFZ for very long if the Libyan army isn't conducting offensive operations. He's probably right.kalm wrote:Ghaddafi has ordered a halt to military operations.LeadBolt wrote:I agree that this is a no win situation for the USA. Let the UN impose their will without us for a change. It is too little, too late and not something we should have been involved in to begin with. I'm not sure what Obama thought was going to happen when he moved a ship and 400 marines off their coast in the first place. Either go in to win, which we can't or stay out, which we should.
At the risk of offending Cluck I'll withhold judgement on this until the dust settles.

True, but while the UN has been sitting on its hands for the past several weeks he's generated a lot of compliance from the rebels. It's tough to begin bombing radar sites and doing flyovers when he's instituted a ceasefire.CitadelGrad wrote:Pretty shrewd move by Q. It kind of pulls the rug from under the UN. He assumes that the UN won't have the stamina or will to enforce a NFZ for very long if the Libyan army isn't conducting offensive operations. He's probably right.kalm wrote:
Ghaddafi has ordered a halt to military operations.
At the risk of offending Cluck I'll withhold judgement on this until the dust settles.

They don't count! They're all either stuck in reverse or don't work!TwinTownBisonFan wrote:you realize the french, british and italians have air forces, don't you?
the french have around 900
the italians have 500

Good point.CitadelGrad wrote:Pretty shrewd move by Q. It kind of pulls the rug from under the UN. He assumes that the UN won't have the stamina or will to enforce a NFZ for very long if the Libyan army isn't conducting offensive operations. He's probably right.kalm wrote:
Ghaddafi has ordered a halt to military operations.
At the risk of offending Cluck I'll withhold judgement on this until the dust settles.