Liberal Conspiracy

[Skjellyfetti]

Why are y'all threatening to ban him? Jesus fucking Christ. Take deep breaths, count to 10, ignore, etc.

[AZGrizFan]

Why are y'all threatening to ban him? Jesus fucking Christ. Take deep breaths, count to 10, ignore, etc.

I don't have that power. But he's doing the same stupid-ass shit he did at AGS...dragging all his personal hatred into every fucking thread.

[∞∞∞]

Study mob mentality, and you can better understand my suspicion.

I actually believe that climate change is being discredited because of the mob mentality of those who don't understand the science behind it other than what's being fed to them by certain political think tanks.

These are really long reads (and there's more if you want), but they help make clear how we've come to this point where the extensive research and science behind climate change is real, and yet the public perception of it is so divided, especially among conservatives who deny it so much more fervently.

http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bose/ ... _paper.pdf

http://stephenschneider.stanford.edu/Pu ... ap2003.pdf

Another great read that I always recommed (updated yearly I believe) is the Earth Policy Reader.

[CID1990]

There you go again. And you have the audacity to wonder why you got kicked off the FCS discussion board on AGS. Are you retarded, slow, or just stupid?

"Audacity?!" Yeah, that post was so audacious of me. haha. Did someone get a Roget's for his birthday or something? Try proper usage next time.

Actually that was a proper use of the word.

In fact it was pretty much spot on.

[OpieGSU]

"Audacity?!" Yeah, that post was so audacious of me. haha. Did someone get a Roget's for his birthday or something? Try proper usage next time.

Actually that was a proper use of the word.

In fact it was pretty much spot on.

How OUTRAGEOUS of me!!!! You must be easily shocked, rube.

[CID1990]

Actually that was a proper use of the word.

In fact it was pretty much spot on.

How OUTRAGEOUS of me!!!! You must be easily shocked, rube.

Didn't you say something about people laughing at their own jokes in an earlier post/thread?

[kalm]

Plenty of scientists/researchers work in the private sector. The pharmaceutical industry comes to mind.

JBBP's perspective comes from his science friend who sails boats and slacks off... Or something like that.

There's a thing called peer review that ensures that all published work/grant proposals are correct, ethical and legal. Plenty of scientist don't get federal funding for a variety of reasons.

Scientist work on theories, not preconceived, orchestrated notions. They may have theories about what they think is going on, but they don't assume that is correct until they do they experiments and see what the data tells them. Sometimes you're right, sometimes you're wrong. There's plenty of controversy in science, people publish things others don't agree with all the time.

Climate's changing JBBP, the average scientist doesn't give a dicks shake about politics. Didn't a repub prez nominee come out and acknowledge man made climate change? Uh oh.

Decisiveness is a conk virtue while open mindedness is a donk virtue. Deciveness gets rewarded in the business world, but not so much in science. I think it basically boils down to black and white world view versus gray. Whether or not this equates to left leaning bias is the interesting question, and JMUDJ seems to be making a strong point here.

[houndawg]

Why is it so hard for you people to believe that there are those out there with ethics and professional responsibility, who would not allow their personal politics to effect the integrity of the scientific process?
You all may have no ethics, but some people do.

"Affect", O'pie.

Since you're a stickler for proper word usage and all.

[Ivytalk]

Why is it so hard for you people to believe that there are those out there with ethics and professional responsibility, who would not allow their personal politics to effect the integrity of the scientific process?
You all may have no ethics, but some people do.

"Affect", O'pie.

Since you're a stickler for proper word usage and all.

[OpieGSU]

Why is it so hard for you people to believe that there are those out there with ethics and professional responsibility, who would not allow their personal politics to effect the integrity of the scientific process?
You all may have no ethics, but some people do.

"Affect", O'pie.

Since you're a stickler for proper word usage and all.

Actually, you're wrong, dumbass.
This is the exception where "effect' is correct to use as a verb.
For example. "The politician hoped that his candidacy would effect change in the political discourse."

Look it up,and learn, tool.

[pike51]

Why are y'all threatening to ban him? Jesus **** Christ. Take deep breaths, count to 10, ignore, etc.

I don't have that power. But he's doing the same stupid-ass **** he did at AGS...dragging all his personal hatred into every **** thread.

I hate tomatoes and it's personal. I think I'll make that my sig line and drag it into every thread I post in.

[pike51]

"Affect", O'pie.

Since you're a stickler for proper word usage and all.

Actually, you're wrong, dumbass.
This is the exception where "effect' is correct to use as a verb.
For example. "The politician hoped that his candidacy would effect change in the political discourse."

Look it up,and learn, tool.

Opie 1 houndawg 0 Finally, a win for the Opister.

[houndawg]

"Affect", O'pie.

Since you're a stickler for proper word usage and all.

Actually, you're wrong, dumbass.
This is the exception where "effect' is correct to use as a verb.
For example. "The politician hoped that his candidacy would effect change in the political discourse."

Look it up,and learn, tool.

Negative, Opossum, incorrect usage on your part. Your sentence clearly calls for "affect". One would effect integrity, whereas one would affect the integrity.

Or to use your example - one would not say the politician hoped his candidacy would effect the change in the political discourse. Either way you are wrong.

[houndawg]

Actually, you're wrong, dumbass.
This is the exception where "effect' is correct to use as a verb.
For example. "The politician hoped that his candidacy would effect change in the political discourse."

Look it up,and learn, tool.

Opie 1 houndawg 0 Finally, a win for the Opister.

But that ain't how he used it, piker.

One would effect integrity or affect the integrity. Maybe he did it on purpose like his "misspelling" misoyginist "on purpose".

[OpieGSU]

Actually, you're wrong, dumbass.
This is the exception where "effect' is correct to use as a verb.
For example. "The politician hoped that his candidacy would effect change in the political discourse."

Look it up,and learn, tool.

Negative, Opossum, incorrect usage on your part. Your sentence clearly calls for "affect". One would effect integrity, whereas one would affect the integrity.

Or to use your example - one would not say the politician hoped his candidacy would effect the change in the political discourse. Either way you are wrong.

The use doesn't hinge on you placing the word 'the" after the verb, guy. Are you really that stupid. You shot your mouth off and you got proved wrong. Go back to G.E.D. class, and keep grasping. You just got Opied.

[houndawg]

Negative, Opossum, incorrect usage on your part. Your sentence clearly calls for "affect". One would effect integrity, whereas one would affect the integrity.

Or to use your example - one would not say the politician hoped his candidacy would effect the change in the political discourse. Either way you are wrong.

The use doesn't hinge on you placing the word 'the" after the verb, guy. Are you really that stupid. You shot your mouth off and you got proved wrong. Go back to G.E.D. class, and keep grasping. You just got Opied.

Sorry Opie, back of the class for you. You should have said "...affect the integrity of the scientific process". The integrity doesn't need to be "effected", it's already there.


You tell em back at AGS that you're already somebody's bitch here now and you don't need them anyway.

[houndawg]

"Affect", O'pie.

Since you're a stickler for proper word usage and all.

Actually, you're wrong, dumbass.
This is the exception where "effect' is correct to use as a verb.
For example. "The politician hoped that his candidacy would effect change in the political discourse."

Look it up,and learn, tool.

Replace "effect" with it's verb meaning of "create" and you can see your mistake, opal.

[OpieGSU]

Actually, you're wrong, dumbass.
This is the exception where "effect' is correct to use as a verb.
For example. "The politician hoped that his candidacy would effect change in the political discourse."

Look it up,and learn, tool.

Replace "effect" with it's verb meaning of "create" and you can see your mistake, opal.

huh?
You do realize that doesn't make any sense, right?
You're wrong, you've been proven wrong, and your continued posts insisting that you are correct, make zero sense at at grammatically.

[OpieGSU]

Replace "effect" with it's verb meaning of "create" and you can see your mistake, opal.

huh?
You do realize that doesn't make any sense, right?
You're wrong, you've been proven wrong, and your continued posts insisting that you are correct, make zero sense at all grammatically. Keep diggin that hole if you want, but anybody can see that you're wrong.

[Grizalltheway]

Replace "effect" with it's verb meaning of "create" and you can see your mistake, opal.

huh?
You do realize that doesn't make any sense, right?
You're wrong, you've been proven wrong, and your continued posts insisting that you are correct, make zero sense at at grammatically.

[AZGrizFan]

I just figured it out:

Opie is Cliff Clavin.



There is NOTHING he doesn't think he knows EVERYTHING about. Yet 99.9% of the time he's wrong!

[OpieGSU]

I know you hate it when I'm right, but don't hate the player. hate the game.
Excellent typo pickup, btw. Please remove your nose from my ass. Thanks.
I'm not the guy who started ths stupid argument if you'll read back. You jerk offs pick my shit apart, and when you're proven wrong, you blame me for pointing it out. Fvcking babies.

[houndawg]

Replace "effect" with it's verb meaning of "create" and you can see your mistake, opal.

huh?
You do realize that doesn't make any sense, right?
You're wrong, you've been proven wrong, and your continued posts insisting that you are correct, make zero sense at at grammatically.

Exactly, Opee, it doesn't make sense in your original sentence when used as a verb. That's what I've been schooling you on. If you're going to hang around here, you need to keep up.

"Effect" when used as a verb means "to create".

Your original sentence: Why is it so hard for you people to believe that there are those out there with ethics and professional responsibility, who would not allow their personal politics to effect the integrity of the scientific process.

Now see how the verb meaning is all wrong?

If you affect something, there is an effect. Personal politics would affect integrity of the scientific process.

You're my bitch now, Oboe. Now go blow citdog, he gave me some cigarettes.

[houndawg]

I know you hate it when I'm right, but don't hate the player. hate the game.
Excellent typo pickup, btw. Please remove your nose from my ass. Thanks.
I'm not the guy who started ths stupid argument if you'll read back. You jerk offs pick my **** apart, and when you're proven wrong, you blame me for pointing it out. Fvcking babies.

Now don't start with the crybaby shit, oval. I understand no lawyer likes getting schooled by an Engineer on proper use of the English language, but, hey, that's why we don't have to hang around in grad school waiting for job offers.

[OpieGSU]

hit up webster, and get back to me. Effect has different meanings, tool. My usage is correct.
as for anyone being your bitch, I think it's pretty obvious that the only bitch you have is your right hand,and her name is Rosey Palmer. How does the chaffing AFFECT you?