data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fe1ba/fe1baf9b4384f2418e8d9b59f411d31db1c6387d" alt="#twocents :twocents:"
Here's what URI did against us last year, on our field. Not a cakewalk: http://www.bluehens.com/sportsinfo/foot ... fb10-7.htm
Did they reduce schollies this year, or were they still running with a lower amount they had been the last several? I seem to recall that they increased the last couple years, but obviously have to get them back to NEC limits.93henfan wrote:I would not underestimate URI, folks. I haven't studied who they lost yet (I will before the next poll), but they gave UD a hell of an effort last year. They seemed to be headed upward rather than maintaining the same old URI level we had become accustomed to.
Brand new to the CAA but has already learned the art of sandbagging.ODUalum11 wrote:Not to sound like a pessimist but if the O/U is 2.5, I'll go under. I think we'll get two wins. Yeah, we proved we could be competitive but that was one game, early in the season when I thought it was pretty clear that WM took us lightly and they made some costly mistakes with turnovers in the redzone and missed easy FG's. We have to wait and see what ODU can do against a full CAA schedule for 8 straight weeks. Like Flagship said, if Demarco goes down we are in some serious trouble on offense and it showed last year when Manley had to take over for him in the NC Central game and the SSU game. I respect the CAA too much to just think we can beat that team or whoever. I think if any other CAA team had the same schedule the last two years they would have had the same record (17-5) or better.
I may or may not be sandbagging but its hard to say how good we'll be when we really haven't play anybody except WM the first two years. We almost lost to a pretty lousy Gardner-Webb team at home and lost to Jacksonville who eventually got manhandled by App. State a couple weeks later. In other words, I'm staying cautiously optimistic. Heck even Georgia State and Hampton concern me.89Hen wrote:Brand new to the CAA but has already learned the art of sandbagging.ODUalum11 wrote:Not to sound like a pessimist but if the O/U is 2.5, I'll go under. I think we'll get two wins. Yeah, we proved we could be competitive but that was one game, early in the season when I thought it was pretty clear that WM took us lightly and they made some costly mistakes with turnovers in the redzone and missed easy FG's. We have to wait and see what ODU can do against a full CAA schedule for 8 straight weeks. Like Flagship said, if Demarco goes down we are in some serious trouble on offense and it showed last year when Manley had to take over for him in the NC Central game and the SSU game. I respect the CAA too much to just think we can beat that team or whoever. I think if any other CAA team had the same schedule the last two years they would have had the same record (17-5) or better.
I don't see them in the top 3, but I'm sure you watched how they played in Newark, and we saw sismilar effort in Williamsburg. As far as stats go, here's three key ones.State Line Liquors wrote: Does anyone have any actual reason to believe URI is going to contend for the top 3rd of the league besides the 'they played us tough last year' ideology? Can anyone put together an advertisement on why I should be worried about URI doing anything to anyone this year, based upon actual team merit, history, returning talent, etc? I can be convinced, I just need someone to do the convincing.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
dbackjon wrote:ODU/Trip = Under 4
Well, they did lose @ Fordham last yr and at home to Brown.State Line Liquors wrote:I voted 3 W's.
RE: URI-----Rhode Island was last in the conference in total defense, 7th in scoring defense, last in pass defense. They were basically last in the league in Opponents 3rd down conversion ratio. They allowed more first downs than anyone else in the league besides a National Runner Up and a National Semi-Finalist, who play 3 and 4 more games than URI. They lost their leading tackler, their leading TFL'er (aka their two best defensive players) to graduation, AND their defensive line coach to Stony Brook.
They scored less than 20 points per game. Their QB was near the bottom in pasing efficiency and completion percentage, and was worst in the league with 12 picks thrown. Their leading rusher, the quarterback, was averaging less than 4 yards a carry.
Does anyone have any actual reason to believe URI is going to contend for the top 3rd of the league besides the 'they played us tough last year' ideology? Can anyone put together an advertisement on why I should be worried about URI doing anything to anyone this year, based upon actual team merit, history, returning talent, etc? I can be convinced, I just need someone to do the convincing.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
And here's 3 more:Tribe4SF wrote:I don't see them in the top 3, but I'm sure you watched how they played in Newark, and we saw sismilar effort in Williamsburg. As far as stats go, here's three key ones.State Line Liquors wrote: Does anyone have any actual reason to believe URI is going to contend for the top 3rd of the league besides the 'they played us tough last year' ideology? Can anyone put together an advertisement on why I should be worried about URI doing anything to anyone this year, based upon actual team merit, history, returning talent, etc? I can be convinced, I just need someone to do the convincing.
URI 28 UNH 25
URI 17 Villanova 14
URI 37 UMass 34
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
BDK has it right.Tribe4SF wrote:I don't see them in the top 3, but I'm sure you watched how they played in Newark, and we saw sismilar effort in Williamsburg. As far as stats go, here's three key ones.State Line Liquors wrote: Does anyone have any actual reason to believe URI is going to contend for the top 3rd of the league besides the 'they played us tough last year' ideology? Can anyone put together an advertisement on why I should be worried about URI doing anything to anyone this year, based upon actual team merit, history, returning talent, etc? I can be convinced, I just need someone to do the convincing.
URI 28 UNH 25
URI 17 Villanova 14
URI 37 UMass 34
Aren't you the one saying the inexperienced community organizers are better than the naysayers are implying?Tribal wrote:#1: The way you guys vote on here, it's no wonder we've voted certain people President of the United States. Geesh.
Obviously you didn't pay attention to the part about no bye week.Tribal wrote:#1: The way you guys vote on here, it's no wonder we've voted certain people President of the United States. Geesh.
#2: ODU will upset one of the top-tier CAA teams this season. UD, W&M, JMU, UR, or Nova are going to fall. UD is a far better team, but playing ODU early (while they're still fired up) will make the game closer than it should be. If I had to pick, I would lean towards upsetting JMU or W&M.
..peacefully and patriotically make your voices heard..
Yes, some of us botched it. But at least I didn't vote Obama, Reid, and Pelosi.Tribal wrote:My comment referred to the fact that several posters voted without knowing for what they were voting.
URI beat Brown 27-24. No one is claiming they should be a CAA favorite, but they look to improve on a 4-4 CAA record last year. Take them for granted if you want, but they were a dangerous team last year, and will be again.BDKJMU wrote:And here's 3 more:Tribe4SF wrote:
I don't see them in the top 3, but I'm sure you watched how they played in Newark, and we saw sismilar effort in Williamsburg. As far as stats go, here's three key ones.
URI 28 UNH 25
URI 17 Villanova 14
URI 37 UMass 34
Fordham 27, URI 25
Brown 27, URI 24
Maine 28, URI 23
They can look to do whatever they want, but they won't end up getting it done. Based on the fundamentals of what they had, what they have, and what's going on with their program, I won't rate URI as a 'buy' at this point.Tribe4SF wrote: No one is claiming they should be a CAA favorite, but they look to improve on a 4-4 CAA record last year. Take them for granted if you want, but they were a dangerous team last year, and will be again.
No bye week? What?!?! I had no idea.BDKJMU wrote:Obviously you didn't pay attention to the part about no bye week.Tribal wrote:#1: The way you guys vote on here, it's no wonder we've voted certain people President of the United States. Geesh.
#2: ODU will upset one of the top-tier CAA teams this season. UD, W&M, JMU, UR, or Nova are going to fall. UD is a far better team, but playing ODU early (while they're still fired up) will make the game closer than it should be. If I had to pick, I would lean towards upsetting JMU or W&M.
If Georgia State isn't the one team without a bye week in the CAA next season I'll be pretty upset. My understanding is that in the CAA with the schedule format there is always one team who doesn't recieve a week off.Tribal wrote:No bye week? What?!?! I had no idea.BDKJMU wrote:
Obviously you didn't pay attention to the part about no bye week.