EWU @ Montana

CatBlitz22 · Post by **CatBlitz22** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 7:30 pm

It would be to UM's benefit to actually upload them in HD and not 480p. Also, why do those videos have a slo-mo replay of every play?

Post by **DuckDuckGriz** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:06 pm

CatBlitz22 wrote:It would be to UM's benefit to actually upload them in HD and not 480p. Also, why do those videos have a slo-mo replay of every play?

I agree. I'm all about highlights, but I'm not going to sit through 11 minutes from a 17-14 game.

Post by **SeattleGriz** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:42 pm

CatBlitz22 wrote:It would be to UM's benefit to actually upload them in HD and not 480p. Also, why do those videos have a slo-mo replay of every play?

All the footage is taken from the broadcast material. Every play has a reply on TV. Whoever makes the highlight, felt the reply was worth viewing.

Post by **grizzaholic** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:46 pm

SeattleGriz wrote:
CatBlitz22 wrote:It would be to UM's benefit to actually upload them in HD and not 480p. Also, why do those videos have a slo-mo replay of every play?
All the footage is taken from the broadcast material. Every play has a reply on TV. Whoever makes the highlight, felt the reply was worth viewing.

If you guys are talking about the video I posted, this weeks one wasn't all that good. He has been doing an exceptional job the past couple years, everyone is entitled to a week off, no?

CatBlitz22 · Post by **CatBlitz22** » Sun Sep 18, 2011 8:55 pm

grizzaholic wrote:
SeattleGriz wrote:
All the footage is taken from the broadcast material. Every play has a reply on TV. Whoever makes the highlight, felt the reply was worth viewing.
If you guys are talking about the video I posted, this weeks one wasn't all that good. He has been doing an exceptional job the past couple years, everyone is entitled to a week off, no?

I've noticed it on a ton of the UM highlights though. Just sayin.

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:03 am

CatBlitz22 wrote:
grizzaholic wrote:
If you guys are talking about the video I posted, this weeks one wasn't all that good. He has been doing an exceptional job the past couple years, everyone is entitled to a week off, no?
I've noticed it on a ton of the UM highlights though. Just sayin.

Agreed, and I'm not a huge fan of it either, 22. I'd rather see MORE plays, than the same plays repeated twice.

cats2506 · Post by **cats2506** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:05 am

AZGrizFan wrote:
CatBlitz22 wrote:
I've noticed it on a ton of the UM highlights though. Just sayin.
Agreed, and I'm not a huge fan of it either, 22. I'd rather see MORE plays, than the same plays repeated twice.

There is only a limited number of positive plays that um has on offense, they are just trying to stretch the highlight reel

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:27 am

cats2506 wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
Agreed, and I'm not a huge fan of it either, 22. I'd rather see MORE plays, than the same plays repeated twice.
There is only a limited number of positive plays that um has on offense, they are just trying to stretch the highlight reel

But the Griz could fill a film vault with the defensive highlights.

cats2506 · Post by **cats2506** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:42 am

AZGrizFan wrote:
cats2506 wrote:
There is only a limited number of positive plays that um has on offense, they are just trying to stretch the highlight reel
But the Griz could fill a film vault with the defensive highlights.

Yeah, BLM's overthrows make good highlights

Post by **AZGrizFan** » Mon Sep 19, 2011 8:44 am

cats2506 wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
But the Griz could fill a film vault with the defensive highlights.
Yeah, BLM's overthrows make good highlights

They happen for a reason. Even someone with a bozo education can understand that, no?

Championship Subdivision Football | FCS Football | Stadiums | Blogs | Forums

EWU @ Montana

Re: EWU @ Montana

Re: EWU @ Montana

Re: EWU @ Montana

Re: EWU @ Montana

Re: EWU @ Montana

Re: EWU @ Montana

Re: EWU @ Montana

Re: EWU @ Montana

Re: EWU @ Montana

Re: EWU @ Montana