Obama Still Gonna Take It In 2012.....

[Ibanez]

Flash, you make no sense. So, by those pictures, we should equate Il Duce to Obama?

How about this picture?



Look, The Rocks chin is up. Maybe Obama is a WWF Champion. Maybe he's a so-so Hollywood Actor. Maybe he's former Defensive-tackle for Miami. I don't know, you tell me because apparently you know.

[BlueHen86]

Double post

[BlueHen86]

Do you have a point John? I bet you could find similiar pictures of most famous politicians from the last 70 years.

[tampa_griz]

If the following two things happen Obama is toast.

1. Unemployment remains where it is.
2. Mitt Romney wins the nomination.

No President has won reelection with less worse unemployment numbers. Telling the voters that Bush screwed it up and that he has no idea how to fix it ain't gonna cut it.

[kalm]

OMG!!! HE'S TOTALLY FASCIST!!!!

It's not the political philosophy, though I do think his general philosophy of government is closer to fascism than most people would think. It's the narcisism. The meglalomaniacal tendency. The thinking that he's something he's not. I'm talking about in terms of capability.

I mean, obviously he holds a very important position. But just as obviously, I think, he thinks he's like some kind of Messiah. He really thinks he's "all that." You can see it in his body language. And he's not.

He's just an illustration of how bad a mistake the American electorate can make.

With the exception of Paul, every conk candidate will carry the same fascistic traits. You have to in order to get elected and remain in power.

[Ivytalk]

It's not the political philosophy, though I do think his general philosophy of government is closer to fascism than most people would think. It's the narcisism. The meglalomaniacal tendency. The thinking that he's something he's not. I'm talking about in terms of capability.

I mean, obviously he holds a very important position. But just as obviously, I think, he thinks he's like some kind of Messiah. He really thinks he's "all that." You can see it in his body language. And he's not.

He's just an illustration of how bad a mistake the American electorate can make.

With the exception of Paul, every conk candidate will carry the same fascistic traits. You have to in order to get elected and remain in power.

Even for you, kalm, this is absurd. You're letting your preference for transference take over. Substantiate your claim, candidate by candidate.

[kalm]

With the exception of Paul, every conk candidate will carry the same fascistic traits. You have to in order to get elected and remain in power.

Even for you, kalm, this is absurd. You're letting your preference for transference take over. Substantiate your claim, candidate by candidate.

If you don't understand this extremely simple idea you've had your head up your ass since at least the first Bush.

[Ivytalk]

Even for you, kalm, this is absurd. You're letting your preference for transference take over. Substantiate your claim, candidate by candidate.

If you don't understand this extremely simple idea you've had your head up your ass since at least the first Bush.

It's obvious that you have no understanding of fascism, o oracle of the Palouse. Read Jonah Goldberg's book.

[kalm]

If you don't understand this extremely simple idea you've had your head up your ass since at least the first Bush.

It's obvious that you have no understanding of fascism, o oracle of the Palouse. Read Jonah Goldberg's book.

I've read many of his articles so no thanks.

We are witnessing nearly complete regulatory and financial capture and both sides use it to create a sense of nationalism. It's really not a difficult concept.

But I do like "oracle of the Palouse". That was good.

[JohnStOnge]

Do you have a point John? I bet you could find similiar pictures of most famous politicians from the last 70 years.

I think that anybody who's been paying attention at all knows that Bush had a much humbler demeanor than Obama has. Obama always has that "I'm all that" demeanor. He's got his chin pointed into the air a lot. Bush was a self-depreciating sort. Obama is most certainly not.

Obama is a megalomaniac. It's written all over him.

And you know it.

[BlueHen86]

Do you have a point John? I bet you could find similiar pictures of most famous politicians from the last 70 years.

I think that anybody who's been paying attention at all knows that Bush had a much humbler demeanor than Obama has. Obama always has that "I'm all that" demeanor. He's got his chin pointed into the air a lot. Bush was a self-depreciating sort. Obama is most certainly not.

Obama is a megalomaniac. It's written all over him.

And you know it.

I don't know that he's any more of a megalomaniac than any other big name political figure in the last 70 years.

My guess is that, in addition to being gayphobic, you're a racist. And you know it.

[Cap'n Cat]

I know EXACTLY what I'm talking about, Mark. I've seen what's happened in the USSR, Red China, Cuba, and many nations in Eastern Europe, not to mention the lesser socialistic stuff we've seen elsewhere. No, I'm not talking about tanks in the streets. I don't think he'll do that. But this unconstitutional ObamaCare trash is DEFINITELY in the direction of Communism. I may be exaggerating about the degree in some respects, but he is consistently pushing highly socialistic ideas which go against the grain of the vast majority of this country, and his backers (read: ACORN) are even worse.

You, Madam, are one stupid cvnt.

[houndawg]

Do you have a point John? I bet you could find similiar pictures of most famous politicians from the last 70 years.

I think that anybody who's been paying attention at all knows that Bush had a much humbler demeanor than Obama has. Obama always has that "I'm all that" demeanor. He's got his chin pointed into the air a lot. Bush was a self-depreciating sort. Obama is most certainly not.

Obama is a megalomaniac. It's written all over him.

And you know it.

I think the word you want is "uppity", John.



And Bush being modest is certainly no surprise, he has a lot to be modest about.

[Ibanez]

I know EXACTLY what I'm talking about, Mark. I've seen what's happened in the USSR, Red China, Cuba, and many nations in Eastern Europe, not to mention the lesser socialistic stuff we've seen elsewhere. No, I'm not talking about tanks in the streets. I don't think he'll do that. But this unconstitutional ObamaCare trash is DEFINITELY in the direction of Communism. I may be exaggerating about the degree in some respects, but he is consistently pushing highly socialistic ideas which go against the grain of the vast majority of this country, and his backers (read: ACORN) are even worse.

You mean he's attacked countries without a declaration of war? Or he's nationalized banks? Or he's illegally wired tapped civilians? How has he taken the wealth away from the big business' and given them to the people? Where are our "communes?" Where is there an industry that is 100% owned and operated by the Fed. Gov't? The military isn't even 100% Gov't owned. We don't own Boeing, Pfzier, Burger King. If you want to compare the USSR to the USA, you are off base.

[kalm]

I know EXACTLY what I'm talking about, Mark. I've seen what's happened in the USSR, Red China, Cuba, and many nations in Eastern Europe, not to mention the lesser socialistic stuff we've seen elsewhere. No, I'm not talking about tanks in the streets. I don't think he'll do that. But this unconstitutional ObamaCare trash is DEFINITELY in the direction of Communism. I may be exaggerating about the degree in some respects, but he is consistently pushing highly socialistic ideas which go against the grain of the vast majority of this country, and his backers (read: ACORN) are even worse.

You mean he's attacked countries without a declaration of war? Or he's nationalized banks? Or he's illegally wired tapped civilians? How has he taken the wealth away from the big business' and given them to the people? Where are our "communes?" Where is there an industry that is 100% owned and operated by the Fed. Gov't? The military isn't even 100% Gov't owned. We don't own Boeing, Pfzier, Burger King. If you want to compare the USSR to the USA, you are off base.

This.

When you merge corporations and government for the "good of the nation" with limited benefit to the humble masses it's called fascism. That's a far stronger case to make about Obamacare.

[Ibanez]

You mean he's attacked countries without a declaration of war? Or he's nationalized banks? Or he's illegally wired tapped civilians? How has he taken the wealth away from the big business' and given them to the people? Where are our "communes?" Where is there an industry that is 100% owned and operated by the Fed. Gov't? The military isn't even 100% Gov't owned. We don't own Boeing, Pfzier, Burger King. If you want to compare the USSR to the USA, you are off base.

This.

When you merge corporations and government for the "good of the nation" with limited benefit to the humble masses it's called fascism. That's a far stronger case to make about Obamacare.

Obamacare is increased regulation. The USA doesn't own BCBS or Aflack.

Socialst, marxist, communist are buzzwords for anyone that isn't your party.

[kalm]

This.

When you merge corporations and government for the "good of the nation" with limited benefit to the humble masses it's called fascism. That's a far stronger case to make about Obamacare.

Obamacare is increased regulation. The USA doesn't own BCBS or Aflack.

Socialst, marxist, communist are buzzwords for anyone that isn't your party.

Agreed which is I why I used fascist. Fascism can be non partisan. And I have no party.

[DSUrocks07]

Do you have a point John? I bet you could find similiar pictures of most famous politicians from the last 70 years.

[DSUrocks07]

[Wedgebuster]

Do you have a point John? I bet you could find similiar pictures of most famous politicians from the last 70 years.

[CID1990]

Even for you, kalm, this is absurd. You're letting your preference for transference take over. Substantiate your claim, candidate by candidate.

If you don't understand this extremely simple idea you've had your head up your ass since at least the first Bush.

Boy that was about the most substantive answer I have ever seen on here.

You and Bill Maher must use the same writer. Maybe he can bring you on his show and you guys can pull each others' pee-pee.

[kalm]

If you don't understand this extremely simple idea you've had your head up your ass since at least the first Bush.

Boy that was about the most substantive answer I have ever seen on here.

You and Bill Maher must use the same writer. Maybe he can bring you on his show and you guys can pull each others' pee-pee.

Thank you.

[Cap'n Cat]

Start diggin' up some new corpses for 2016, Conks, to run against, but fall to Hillary........

[CID1990]

After all the wackos in the GOP field self-destruct, Mitt Romney is going to be the nominee and he is going to give Obama the boot on the strength of independent voters (who, by the way, would not otherwise vote for a Cain or a Gingrich or a Perry).

Everyone knows that Romney is the nominee, barring a Perry-esque meltdown.

[CID1990]

Start diggin' up some new corpses for 2016, Conks, to run against, but fall to Hillary........

She won't run.

If Obama somehow guts out the win in 2012, Madame Secretary will look like a Republican in 2016 anyway.