I couldn't find the "entire response" anywhere, jackwagon.Chizzang wrote:In order to keep his hate alive he needs to cherry pick sections of the response...
Taking the entire response in context leaves nothing to "hang on to hate" with
How should I feel about this FOX News please tell me
Oh How should I defend this please tell me MSNBC
we're basically idiot puppets with a hand shoved up our asses moving our mouths
Chizzang wrote:In order to keep his hate alive he needs to cherry pick sections of the response...
Taking the entire response in context leaves nothing to "hang on to hate" with
How should I feel about this FOX News please tell me
Oh How should I defend this please tell me MSNBC
AZGrizFan wrote:
I couldn't find the "entire response" anywhere, jackwagon.
You complete me Chizzang wrote:AZGrizFan wrote:
I couldn't find the "entire response" anywhere, jackwagon.
Linky?AZGrizFan wrote:Well, she really had no business talking about the film at all. It's a smokescreen to cover the administration's ass for failing to heed intelligence warnings that there were attacks planned on the anniversary. But carry on with your blind faith....Grizalltheway wrote:Interesting that you left out the part where she said there was no justification for the violence, whatsoever. So what do you think she should have said about it? "I lol'd and it was spot on"?
Grizalltheway wrote:Linky?AZGrizFan wrote:
Well, she really had no business talking about the film at all. It's a smokescreen to cover the administration's ass for failing to heed intelligence warnings that there were attacks planned on the anniversary. But carry on with your blind faith....
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 35797.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Grizalltheway wrote:Linky?AZGrizFan wrote:
Well, she really had no business talking about the film at all. It's a smokescreen to cover the administration's ass for failing to heed intelligence warnings that there were attacks planned on the anniversary. But carry on with your blind faith....
Now you're just showing off...AZGrizFan wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 35797.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Grizalltheway wrote:
Linky?
Chizzang wrote:Now you're just showing off...AZGrizFan wrote: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 35797.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Nor does it change that fact that AZ hates HillaryGrizalltheway wrote:Well, I guess we should find out who knew what and when, and why they didn't alert anyone. Still doesn't change the fact that it's the Sec State's job to try and cool things down when they flare up.
I'd LOVE for her to be president right now over the bozo currently in office.Chizzang wrote:Nor does it change that fact that AZ hates HillaryGrizalltheway wrote:Well, I guess we should find out who knew what and when, and why they didn't alert anyone. Still doesn't change the fact that it's the Sec State's job to try and cool things down when they flare up.
Cooling things down by sucking off the Muslims and denigrating one of the founding principles of this country isn't exactly what I'd have in mind for our Secretary of State.Grizalltheway wrote:Well, I guess we should find out who knew what and when, and why they didn't alert anyone. Still doesn't change the fact that it's the Sec State's job to try and cool things down when they flare up.