Binary code is a wonderful thing...just look at how "smart" computers are these days.Chizzang wrote: And so you're implying the solution is..? Romney..?
Says the guy who voted for Beer Stein?Chizzang wrote:And so you're implying the solution is..? Romney..?Cluck U wrote:CNN is lying...as are any news outlets that say Obama did anything wrong.
The e-mails CNN used were also fabricated by Assange from his hideout in London.
We will find out shortly that our Ambassador didn't really get killed...it was an elaborate plot by Obama Ben Ghazi to flush out naysayers in the name of freedom and equality. Stevens will be on CS.com shortly to thank Obama's blind minions for their unwavering support.
Everyone can go back to their zombie-like trance in which they will settle for 4 more years of extraordinary ignorance and typical governing for the wealthy lobbyists and Presidential insiders...simply because lemmings don't want change.
Irony...too big to fail.
I'm just curiousBaldy wrote:Says the guy who voted for Beer Stein?Chizzang wrote:
And so you're implying the solution is..? Romney..?
Well, we have to elect SOMEBODY, and we KNOW Obama isn't any type of answer....Chizzang wrote:I'm just curiousBaldy wrote: Says the guy who voted for Beer Stein?
If some logical people like CluckU think Romney is the answer
IF he does I'm sure his reply would be interesting
And the rest of you fooling yourselves into Romney being the answer is just as laughable.Well, we have to elect SOMEBODY, and we KNOW Obama isn't any type of answer....
You shouldn't be saying anything. You are the largest tool on this board. I bet you would vote for Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh if they ran for president.Says the guy who voted for Beer Stein?
Nope...too liberal.Seahawks08 wrote:You shouldn't be saying anything. You are the largest tool on this board. I bet you would vote for Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh if they ran for president.Says the guy who voted for Beer Stein?
Inside, you know what you should do...you just aren't mentally strong enough to do it...and your posts on this board prove that to be so.Seahawks08 wrote:And the rest of you fooling yourselves into Romney being the answer is just as laughable.Well, we have to elect SOMEBODY, and we KNOW Obama isn't any type of answer....
Inside, you know what you should do...you just aren't mentally strong enough to do it...and your posts on this board prove that to be so.
Sad, really.
Why would Romney be the answer..and what, from all of my posts, would lead you to post such a question?Chizzang wrote:I'm just curiousBaldy wrote: Says the guy who voted for Beer Stein?
If some logical people like CluckU think Romney is the answer
IF he does I'm sure his reply would be interesting
After reading this again, I get multiple meanings out of it. What action would you like me to take that is evident from my posts on this board?Inside, you know what you should do...you just aren't mentally strong enough to do it...and your posts on this board prove that to be so.
Sad, really.
Again: I am not voting for Romney. But any moron who votes for Obama AGAIN after this train wreck of the past four years gets exactly what he/she/it deserves.Seahawks08 wrote:And the rest of you fooling yourselves into Romney being the answer is just as laughable.Well, we have to elect SOMEBODY, and we KNOW Obama isn't any type of answer....
I don't think it's so much voting for Obama again, but rather voting against Romney. And if the last 4 years was a train wreck, I guess the previous 8 years was a nuclear bomb.Again: I am not voting for Romney. But any moron who votes for Obama AGAIN after this train wreck of the past four years gets exactly what he/she/it deserves.
You're 24. In 2000 you were TWELVE. WTF do you REALLY know about the period from 2000-2008 other than what you hear on MSNBC?Seahawks08 wrote:I don't think it's so much voting for Obama again, but rather voting against Romney. And if the last 4 years was a train wreck, I guess the previous 8 years was a nuclear bomb.Again: I am not voting for Romney. But any moron who votes for Obama AGAIN after this train wreck of the past four years gets exactly what he/she/it deserves.
Well shit, historians weren't even alive during most of the events they research and write about. Do you roll your eyes at them, too?AZGrizFan wrote:You're 24. In 2000 you were TWELVE. WTF do you REALLY know about the period from 2000-2008 other than what you hear on MSNBC?Seahawks08 wrote:
I don't think it's so much voting for Obama again, but rather voting against Romney. And if the last 4 years was a train wreck, I guess the previous 8 years was a nuclear bomb.
Yes. Most of that shit has been Obama-ized and rewritten. Orwell would be very proud.Grizalltheway wrote:Well shit, historians weren't even alive during most of the events they research and write about. Do you roll your eyes at them, too?AZGrizFan wrote:
You're 24. In 2000 you were TWELVE. WTF do you REALLY know about the period from 2000-2008 other than what you hear on MSNBC?
That's hilarious since I don't even remember the last time I watched MSNBC. And like Griza said, you don't need to have lived through a period to know what happened. I bet I know more history in general than you do, but that's a different argument for a different time.You're 24. In 2000 you were TWELVE. WTF do you REALLY know about the period from 2000-2008 other than what you hear on MSNBC?
Being a bookworm living in your mom's basement doesn't make you smart, junior.Seahawks08 wrote:That's hilarious since I don't even remember the last time I watched MSNBC. And like Griza said, you don't need to have lived through a period to know what happened. I bet I know more history in general than you do, but that's a different argument for a different time.You're 24. In 2000 you were TWELVE. WTF do you REALLY know about the period from 2000-2008 other than what you hear on MSNBC?
hmm two assumptions there that are the exact opposite in reality. Keep it coming!Being a bookworm living in your mom's basement doesn't make you smart, junior.
Accuracy.Seahawks08 wrote:You shouldn't be saying anything. You have the largest tool on this board.Says the guy who voted for Beer Stein?
Really? Care to provide some examples?kalm wrote:Nope...too liberal.Seahawks08 wrote:
You shouldn't be saying anything. You are the largest tool on this board. I bet you would vote for Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh if they ran for president.
search.php?author_id=860&sr=posts" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;Baldy wrote:Really? Care to provide some examples?kalm wrote:
Nope...too liberal.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhrfhjLd9e4[/youtube]Seahawks08 wrote:That's hilarious since I don't even remember the last time I watched MSNBC. And like Griza said, you don't need to have lived through a period to know what happened. I bet I know more history in general than you do, but that's a different argument for a different time.You're 24. In 2000 you were TWELVE. WTF do you REALLY know about the period from 2000-2008 other than what you hear on MSNBC?
According to the GOP and Fox NewsAZGrizFan wrote:You're 24. In 2000 you were TWELVE. WTF do you REALLY know about the period from 2000-2008 other than what you hear on MSNBC?Seahawks08 wrote:
I don't think it's so much voting for Obama again, but rather voting against Romney. And if the last 4 years was a train wreck, I guess the previous 8 years was a nuclear bomb.
