...and it starts.
...and it starts.
Senate bill rewrite lets feds read your e-mail without warrants
" A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans' e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.
CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans' e-mail, is scheduled for next week.
Leahy's rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies -- including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission -- to access Americans' e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge.
It's an abrupt departure from Leahy's earlier approach, which required police to obtain a search warrant backed by probable cause before they could read the contents of e-mail or other communications. The Vermont Democrat boasted last year that his bill "provides enhanced privacy protections for American consumers by... requiring that the government obtain a search warrant."
Leahy had planned a vote on an earlier version of his bill, designed to update a pair of 1980s-vintage surveillance laws, in late September. But after law enforcement groups including the National District Attorneys' Association and the National Sheriffs' Association organizations objected to the legislation and asked him to "reconsider acting" on it, Leahy pushed back the vote and reworked the bill as a package of amendments to be offered next Thursday."
" A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans' e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.
CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans' e-mail, is scheduled for next week.
Leahy's rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies -- including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission -- to access Americans' e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge.
It's an abrupt departure from Leahy's earlier approach, which required police to obtain a search warrant backed by probable cause before they could read the contents of e-mail or other communications. The Vermont Democrat boasted last year that his bill "provides enhanced privacy protections for American consumers by... requiring that the government obtain a search warrant."
Leahy had planned a vote on an earlier version of his bill, designed to update a pair of 1980s-vintage surveillance laws, in late September. But after law enforcement groups including the National District Attorneys' Association and the National Sheriffs' Association organizations objected to the legislation and asked him to "reconsider acting" on it, Leahy pushed back the vote and reworked the bill as a package of amendments to be offered next Thursday."
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 62329
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: ...and it starts.
If that's all true...unfuckingbelievable.
Another reason to never vote Democrat again although I'm sure plenty of conkressmen will support it too.
Another reason to never vote Democrat again although I'm sure plenty of conkressmen will support it too.
- Gil Dobie
- Supporter
- Posts: 31113
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:45 pm
- I am a fan of: Norse Dakota State
- Location: Historic Leduc Estate
Re: ...and it starts.
Rare EarthHey big brother, I know you're out there somewhere
If we don't get our thing together, big brother will be watching us
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter
- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: ...and it starts.
I can't imagine this being upheld in the courts if it manages to pass...but the Patriot Act is still around, so who knows.
- dbackjon
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 45613
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
- I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
- A.K.A.: He/Him
- Location: Scottsdale
Re: ...and it starts.
Don't you mean ....and it continues?
- UNI88
- Supporter
- Posts: 22958
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:30 am
- I am a fan of: UNI
- Location: the foggy, woggy banks Of the Limpopo River
Re: ...and it starts.
True!dbackjon wrote:Don't you mean ....and it continues?
Being wrong about a topic is called post partisanism - kalm
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
MAQA - putting the Q into qrazy qanon qonspiracy theories since 2015.
Re: ...and it starts.
True, but this will be the first shot across the bow to start his second term.dbackjon wrote:Don't you mean ....and it continues?
- Benne
- Level1
- Posts: 296
- Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 8:07 am
- I am a fan of: SDSU & Montana
- A.K.A.: benne
Re: ...and it starts.
Fuck that shit! common sense should apply here. I hope they bury that motherfucker. I can't imagine populists or libertarians on either side will let that slide.
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 62329
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: ...and it starts.
Exactly my thoughts.Benne wrote:Fuck that shit! common sense should apply here. I hope they bury that motherfucker. I can't imagine populists or libertarians on either side will let that slide.
Re: ...and it starts.
This bill won't see the light of day in the House if it passes the Senate.kalm wrote:Exactly my thoughts.Benne wrote:Fuck that shit! common sense should apply here. I hope they bury that motherfucker. I can't imagine populists or libertarians on either side will let that slide.
Anyone want to take wagers that the Donks in the Senate will demagogue the House republicans if it passes and gets shelved? I can hear them now..."the republicans want to snoop into your emails", when in fact that is exactly what this legislation is calling for.
- CitadelGrad
- Level4
- Posts: 5210
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
- I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
- A.K.A.: El Cid
- Location: St. Louis
Re: ...and it starts.
Are you speaking of the legislation or the senator?Benne wrote:I hope they bury that motherfucker.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787
- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787
- CID1990
- Level5
- Posts: 25478
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: ...and it starts.
If this passes, all I can say is
use smoke signals and
stock up on .223
use smoke signals and
stock up on .223
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
- Col Hogan
- Supporter
- Posts: 12230
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:29 am
- I am a fan of: William & Mary
- Location: Republic of Texas
Re: ...and it starts.
Where can I learn #1CID1990 wrote:If this passes, all I can say is
1. use smoke signals and
2. stock up on .223
# 2 is underway...
Occupying My House!
“Tolerance and Apathy are the last virtues of a dying society.” Aristotle
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.
Malo periculosam, libertatem quam quietam servitutem.