vutomcat wrote:Bad news for Hen fans. The SRS is being used by the selection committee from what I understand. Hope for Nova fans. Also, from what I understand the committee will be considering teams with 6 wins for the first time this year!
For those that don't want to open the spreadsheet the top 10 for SRS are:
1 NDSU
2 EIU
3 SELA
4 EWU
5 Nova
6 Towson
7 McNeese St
8 UNI
9 Coastal Carolina
10 Maine
CAA Power Rankings
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: CAA Power Rankings

- vutomcat
- Level2

- Posts: 904
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
- I am a fan of: Villanova
- Location: South Jersey
Re: CAA Power Rankings
DON'T THINK SO 89er. READ ON.
In the FCS Huddle: Nothing 'Simple' about FCS playoff selections
Published September 11, 2013 /
Sports Network
Philadelphia, PA – There is an indelible image for the Sunday morning the NCAA announces the field for the FCS playoffs in late November.
It's not coaches and players celebrating wildly like it's Christmas morning - although that happens.
It's more from the members of the final few teams that were denied an at-large bid. They are the ones with stunned looks of disbelief after their magic carpet was pulled out from underneath their season.
While the expansion of the FCS playoffs by four teams this season has been met with open arms nationally, the less-publicized addition of a ratings system for the NCAA selection committee to use in picking its field has been embraced with a sense of enthusiasm, if not relief, across the FCS.
The Simple Rating System, or SRS, is similar to the RPI system used in college basketball and will quantify the strength of a team's schedule. Its use will help lead to a more concrete selection of at-large qualifiers, which will rise by three to 13 in the new 24-team field. The additional bid for the Pioneer Football League champion brings the number of conference champions to 11.
"It's been long overdue in my opinion. I think you'd find that is the consensus with our coaches," said coach Clint Conque of eighth-ranked Central Arkansas
One of the main reasons, according to coach Mark Farley of seventh-ranked Northern Iowa, is "probably the biggest deficiency right now in FCS is the difference in schedules. There's a lot of (teams) that are getting automatic bids that maybe don't play as strong of leagues or strong of schedules" as a conference like Farley's, the Missouri Valley Football Conference, which is home to North Dakota State, the reigning two-time FCS national champion.
The SRS will factor in all of a team's games against FCS, FBS and Division II competition. In past years, a game against a Division II opponent did not count toward a team's resume.
But the new system will incorporate them into the equation and rightfully differentiate the levels of wins, including both home and away, which will provide a true strength of schedule tool. It will be recalculated on a weekly basis through the final regular-season games on Nov. 23 and the announcement of the playoff field the next morning.
The selection committee also will consider potential at-large teams with six wins against Division I competition, when in the past it basically considered seven to be the benchmark.
Conque says the new factors will help teams in conferences like his Southland and the Big Sky, where there are many fewer FCS schools geographically than the Northeast, Midwest and Southeast, and almost forces their members to play both a Division II school and an FBS opponent in a season. In the past, that could have hamstrung the chance to get to seven Division I wins.
"To be able to get credit for difficult scheduling, having to play a quality Division II school and the FBS, that balances out a little bit the fact we can't get a game with Valparaiso, Butler or Saint Francis or Drake or people like this," Conque said.
"And I think also, too, because they have this rating system in place, it creates a more objective opinion instead of backroom lawyering that potentially could go on with at-large selection opportunities. I'm not suggesting that that goes on. What I am saying, though, is that it does create a more objective, black and white tool for the committee to use versus more subjective material."
Last year, Lehigh, which had a 10-1 record, and fast-finishing Towson were among the more vocal teams after both were denied at-large bids. Richmond, Eastern Kentucky and Northern Arizona had their gripes as well.
The expansion of the field will open the door to many more claiming candidacy, but the new ratings will solve a lot of the discussion.
"I think," Farley said, "an RPI will help at least balance some scales of ... the schedule that you're playing, the ranked teams that you're playing."
In the FCS Huddle: Nothing 'Simple' about FCS playoff selections
Published September 11, 2013 /
Sports Network
Philadelphia, PA – There is an indelible image for the Sunday morning the NCAA announces the field for the FCS playoffs in late November.
It's not coaches and players celebrating wildly like it's Christmas morning - although that happens.
It's more from the members of the final few teams that were denied an at-large bid. They are the ones with stunned looks of disbelief after their magic carpet was pulled out from underneath their season.
While the expansion of the FCS playoffs by four teams this season has been met with open arms nationally, the less-publicized addition of a ratings system for the NCAA selection committee to use in picking its field has been embraced with a sense of enthusiasm, if not relief, across the FCS.
The Simple Rating System, or SRS, is similar to the RPI system used in college basketball and will quantify the strength of a team's schedule. Its use will help lead to a more concrete selection of at-large qualifiers, which will rise by three to 13 in the new 24-team field. The additional bid for the Pioneer Football League champion brings the number of conference champions to 11.
"It's been long overdue in my opinion. I think you'd find that is the consensus with our coaches," said coach Clint Conque of eighth-ranked Central Arkansas
One of the main reasons, according to coach Mark Farley of seventh-ranked Northern Iowa, is "probably the biggest deficiency right now in FCS is the difference in schedules. There's a lot of (teams) that are getting automatic bids that maybe don't play as strong of leagues or strong of schedules" as a conference like Farley's, the Missouri Valley Football Conference, which is home to North Dakota State, the reigning two-time FCS national champion.
The SRS will factor in all of a team's games against FCS, FBS and Division II competition. In past years, a game against a Division II opponent did not count toward a team's resume.
But the new system will incorporate them into the equation and rightfully differentiate the levels of wins, including both home and away, which will provide a true strength of schedule tool. It will be recalculated on a weekly basis through the final regular-season games on Nov. 23 and the announcement of the playoff field the next morning.
The selection committee also will consider potential at-large teams with six wins against Division I competition, when in the past it basically considered seven to be the benchmark.
Conque says the new factors will help teams in conferences like his Southland and the Big Sky, where there are many fewer FCS schools geographically than the Northeast, Midwest and Southeast, and almost forces their members to play both a Division II school and an FBS opponent in a season. In the past, that could have hamstrung the chance to get to seven Division I wins.
"To be able to get credit for difficult scheduling, having to play a quality Division II school and the FBS, that balances out a little bit the fact we can't get a game with Valparaiso, Butler or Saint Francis or Drake or people like this," Conque said.
"And I think also, too, because they have this rating system in place, it creates a more objective opinion instead of backroom lawyering that potentially could go on with at-large selection opportunities. I'm not suggesting that that goes on. What I am saying, though, is that it does create a more objective, black and white tool for the committee to use versus more subjective material."
Last year, Lehigh, which had a 10-1 record, and fast-finishing Towson were among the more vocal teams after both were denied at-large bids. Richmond, Eastern Kentucky and Northern Arizona had their gripes as well.
The expansion of the field will open the door to many more claiming candidacy, but the new ratings will solve a lot of the discussion.
"I think," Farley said, "an RPI will help at least balance some scales of ... the schedule that you're playing, the ranked teams that you're playing."
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: CAA Power Rankings
I absolutely stand by my comment. Would you care to wager on whether the 13 at-large bids are the top 13 teams in the SRS?vutomcat wrote:DON'T THINK SO 89er. READ ON.

- bluehenbillk
- Level4

- Posts: 7660
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 5:26 am
- I am a fan of: elaware
- Location: East Coast/Hawaii
Re: CAA Power Rankings
The SRS is in "beta mode" for this year - there hasn't even been a consensus that how they are calculating & weighting things is the way to go.
Two things to point out: a 6-5 team has no shot. Zero. I've said it before & will say it again - playing just 11 games was a stupid move, but then again VU loses money on home games so it may have been a cost-savings to only play 11 vs 12.
Secondly, for fellow Hens fans it points out the weak SOS rating UD has. UD gets in at 8-4 only by default. There will/may be other 8-4 teams that the committee selects over UD. Makes UR a must-win pretty much.
Two things to point out: a 6-5 team has no shot. Zero. I've said it before & will say it again - playing just 11 games was a stupid move, but then again VU loses money on home games so it may have been a cost-savings to only play 11 vs 12.
Secondly, for fellow Hens fans it points out the weak SOS rating UD has. UD gets in at 8-4 only by default. There will/may be other 8-4 teams that the committee selects over UD. Makes UR a must-win pretty much.
Make Delaware Football Great Again
Re: CAA Power Rankings
6-5 clearly won't get any team into the playoffs. There's also the chance that 8-4 won't either in a 12-game season, though it would be very tough to leave an 8-4 UD team out, considering the gate we bring, three NC appearances in last 10 seasons, and a football history/tradition that few other schools have.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: CAA Power Rankings
The way this nova dude keeps spouting off with computer polls and things he's sure the committee is going to use makes him sound more and more like Ralph. It's almost like he's convinced that what he's saying is true. Too fuuny, still thinking a 6-5 team, at best, gets into the playoffs without an autobid. You can't make that stuff up. 
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
Re: CAA Power Rankings
Well, Villanova does bring a tremendous gate, like that semifinal game in Radnor in 2009 where they pulled in...GannonFan wrote:The way this nova dude keeps spouting off with computer polls and things he's sure the committee is going to use makes him sound more and more like Ralph. It's almost like he's convinced that what he's saying is true. Too fuuny, still thinking a 6-5 team, at best, gets into the playoffs without an autobid. You can't make that stuff up.
...oh wait, nevermind. 4,171 for a semifinal game on campus. Ouch.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- vutomcat
- Level2

- Posts: 904
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
- I am a fan of: Villanova
- Location: South Jersey
Re: CAA Power Rankings
2009 yes I recall that year----- the National Champions - VU Wildcats!
Re: CAA Power Rankings
Culmination of a long run of success by the A-10/CAA. UMass, Delaware, JMU, Richmond, Nova all National Champions. An incredible run for a conference.vutomcat wrote:2009 yes I recall that year----- the National Champions - VU Wildcats!
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: CAA Power Rankings
I'll kindly ask you to STFU.vutomcat wrote:2009 yes I recall that year----- the National Champions - VU Wildcats!
- vutomcat
- Level2

- Posts: 904
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
- I am a fan of: Villanova
- Location: South Jersey
Re: CAA Power Rankings
Funny
- you have your own to brag about Griz.
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: CAA Power Rankings
Yes, but that one really stung. 14-0 with a miracle comeback against SDSU, ending AE's career in a game for the ages, followed by a 2 point loss thanks to that Polish baseball player. Yuck.vutomcat wrote:Funny- you have your own to brag about Griz.
- vutomcat
- Level2

- Posts: 904
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
- I am a fan of: Villanova
- Location: South Jersey
Re: CAA Power Rankings
This article is not about me spouting off. It's a published article that indicates how the FCS committee is changing the way they select teams. They are using a source (SRS) that is very favorable for Nova.GannonFan wrote:The way this nova dude keeps spouting off with computer polls and things he's sure the committee is going to use makes him sound more and more like Ralph. It's almost like he's convinced that what he's saying is true. Too fuuny, still thinking a 6-5 team, at best, gets into the playoffs without an autobid. You can't make that stuff up.
Not only is the ranking of Nova extremely high but the article also points out that a 6 win team WOULD be considered.
Naturally, a 6 win team could only be considered if it was ranked very high due to strength of schedule and Villanova fits that criteria better than any team in the country. I still think it's a longshot too Hen fans but it's not out of the realm of possibility that you claim it is.
-
TribePride
- Level1

- Posts: 128
- Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:09 pm
Re: CAA Power Rankings
Oh well......
I guess with SRS, William & Mary and Delaware have no hope for the playoffs since they are not in the top 10 of the SRS. Here I thought that we had a chance if we won our last two games, but I guess it doesn't matter.
Also, thanks for reminding me of the fake punt in front of 4000 fans that cost us a national title in 2009.
I guess with SRS, William & Mary and Delaware have no hope for the playoffs since they are not in the top 10 of the SRS. Here I thought that we had a chance if we won our last two games, but I guess it doesn't matter.
Also, thanks for reminding me of the fake punt in front of 4000 fans that cost us a national title in 2009.
Re: CAA Power Rankings
89Hen wrote:Yeah, they will take one look at that and throw it in the circular file.
89Hen wrote: I absolutely stand by my comment
bluehenbilk wrote: a 6-5 team has no shot
93henfan wrote: 6-5 clearly won't get any team into the playoffs
"The selection committee also will consider potential at-large teams with six wins against Division I competition, when in the past it basically considered seven to be the benchmark."GannonFan wrote: It's almost like he's convinced that what he's saying is true. Too fuuny, still thinking a 6-5 team, at best, gets into the playoffs without an autobid.
Nice to see the Hens fans bothered to read the article.
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: CAA Power Rankings
I'm willing to take any bets right now that nova doesn't make the playoffs this year. If you two feel so comfortable that the committee is really going to consider nova, at all, then let's pony up and end this debate. I say they are a mortal lock to miss the playoffs. What do you got?
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: CAA Power Rankings
Nice to see you don't understand how the committee works.Twyxx7 wrote:89Hen wrote:Yeah, they will take one look at that and throw it in the circular file.
89Hen wrote: I absolutely stand by my commentbluehenbilk wrote: a 6-5 team has no shot93henfan wrote: 6-5 clearly won't get any team into the playoffs"The selection committee also will consider potential at-large teams with six wins against Division I competition, when in the past it basically considered seven to be the benchmark."GannonFan wrote: It's almost like he's convinced that what he's saying is true. Too fuuny, still thinking a 6-5 team, at best, gets into the playoffs without an autobid.
Nice to see the Hens fans bothered to read the article.

- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: CAA Power Rankings
I think it's funny when you see younger fans like this guy and that nova kid who actually think the committee really works this way. But hey, those guys don't have the knowledge of the last 25 years or so to really know how this stuff gets done. The blissful ignorance of youth.89Hen wrote:Nice to see you don't understand how the committee works.Twyxx7 wrote:
"The selection committee also will consider potential at-large teams with six wins against Division I competition, when in the past it basically considered seven to be the benchmark."
Nice to see the Hens fans bothered to read the article.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- vutomcat
- Level2

- Posts: 904
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
- I am a fan of: Villanova
- Location: South Jersey
Re: CAA Power Rankings
Or is it that you are resisting change and are afraid to admit you might be wrong despite a published articlle written with information given to the author by the committe?
Look, no Cat fan has said they are getting in. Stop trying to change what we are saying or have said. We are simply telling you that your opinion that they won't be considered if they are 6-5 is wrong. We even showed it to you in writing. All of your insults don't change the facts. If you have any valuable new information, feel free to share. So far, I've given you a load of information to support my opinion.
Look, no Cat fan has said they are getting in. Stop trying to change what we are saying or have said. We are simply telling you that your opinion that they won't be considered if they are 6-5 is wrong. We even showed it to you in writing. All of your insults don't change the facts. If you have any valuable new information, feel free to share. So far, I've given you a load of information to support my opinion.
- vutomcat
- Level2

- Posts: 904
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
- I am a fan of: Villanova
- Location: South Jersey
Re: CAA Power Rankings
Whoa. Now don't you start re-framing what I'm saying too! I think William and Mary is a lock.TribePride wrote:Oh well......
I guess with SRS, William & Mary and Delaware have no hope for the playoffs since they are not in the top 10 of the SRS. Here I thought that we had a chance if we won our last two games, but I guess it doesn't matter.
Also, thanks for reminding me of the fake punt in front of 4000 fans that cost us a national title in 2009.
-
YoUDeeMan
- Level5

- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: CAA Power Rankings
A lock for what? You think they are a lock now, or if they win out? Yeah, those details are important. WTH are those drunken priests teaching kids at nova these days?vutomcat wrote:Whoa. Now don't you start re-framing what I'm saying too! I think William and Mary is a lock.TribePride wrote:Oh well......
I guess with SRS, William & Mary and Delaware have no hope for the playoffs since they are not in the top 10 of the SRS. Here I thought that we had a chance if we won our last two games, but I guess it doesn't matter.
Also, thanks for reminding me of the fake punt in front of 4000 fans that cost us a national title in 2009.
nova is NOT going to the playoffs. They are dead in the water. ZERO chance. Forget what is written...there is no way in a 12-game season that the committee will reward a 6-win team for ducking another loss. NO WAY.
Funny thing...if nova beats Delaware, it will only weaken nova's SOS. We're essentially a poison pill.
Of course, the wildkitties' game with BYE won't help either.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?
- vutomcat
- Level2

- Posts: 904
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
- I am a fan of: Villanova
- Location: South Jersey
Re: CAA Power Rankings
Cluck U wrote:A lock for what? You think they are a lock now, or if they win out? Yeah, those details are important. WTH are those drunken priests teaching kids at nova these days?vutomcat wrote:
Whoa. Now don't you start re-framing what I'm saying too! I think William and Mary is a lock.
nova is NOT going to the playoffs. They are dead in the water. ZERO chance. Forget what is written...there is no way in a 12-game season that the committee will reward a 6-win team for ducking another loss. NO WAY.
Funny thing...if nova beats Delaware, it will only weaken nova's SOS. We're essentially a poison pill.![]()
Of course, the wildkitties' game with BYE won't help either.
I think they only have to win one.
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: CAA Power Rankings
First of all, where is this "we" coming from? Are you royalty? You're the only nova fan here, which must be very comforting to you since that's probably how you feel whenever you go to watch them play, assuming you even go the the games.vutomcat wrote:
Look, no Cat fan has said they are getting in. Stop trying to change what we are saying or have said. .
Second, you said this regarding nova's chances of making the playoffs:
Now you are saing that there are no nova fans who are saying they can get in. So which one is it - you seem to be contradicting yourself here. Do you want me to pull the other quotes from other threads where you say they could get in? You seem to be of two minds on this, which of course, is just a silly ploy on your part to double the nova fanbase. For shame.vutomcat wrote:I still think it's a longshot too... but it's not out of the realm of possibility ...
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- 89Hen
- Supporter

- Posts: 39283
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
- I am a fan of: High Horses
- A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter
Re: CAA Power Rankings
vutomcat wrote:Or is it that you are resisting change and are afraid to admit you might be wrong despite a published articlle written with information given to the author by the committe?
Half the folks here are more credible than SN writers.

- vutomcat
- Level2

- Posts: 904
- Joined: Wed Oct 16, 2013 11:38 am
- I am a fan of: Villanova
- Location: South Jersey
Re: CAA Power Rankings
If you can't tell the difference between "outside the realm of possibility" and "nova is getting in or is a lock" do you really think you should be on here making a case for your team? Oh brother. OGannonFan wrote:First of all, where is this "we" coming from? Are you royalty? You're the only nova fan here, which must be very comforting to you since that's probably how you feel whenever you go to watch them play, assuming you even go the the games.vutomcat wrote:
Look, no Cat fan has said they are getting in. Stop trying to change what we are saying or have said. .
Second, you said this regarding nova's chances of making the playoffs:Now you are saing that there are no nova fans who are saying they can get in. So which one is it - you seem to be contradicting yourself here. Do you want me to pull the other quotes from other threads where you say they could get in? You seem to be of two minds on this, which of course, is just a silly ploy on your part to double the nova fanbase. For shame.vutomcat wrote:I still think it's a longshot too... but it's not out of the realm of possibility ...
You guys are wasting my time.