Wish we could come up with a feasible mechanism to do it. You Conks hate welfare, well............
Discuss.



bobbythekidd wrote:As many horrible parents are out there and as often as we hear stories of people doing awful things to their own kids, a test that would weed out those that don't know newborns don't eat McNuggets and diapers need to be changed more than once a week.
Unfortunetly that idea goes against my nature. I don't want Government to have the ability to deny a prospective parent from having a kid.


No need to bring Mark into this.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Of course we should. We need government to control all activities of nature for us. If some people crap their pants too much then bowel movements should be licensed also.

Ok Cap'n I'll bite as I know you wouldn't have posted that without having a well thought out argument at the ready. How do we do it?Cap'n Cat wrote:bobbythekidd wrote:As many horrible parents are out there and as often as we hear stories of people doing awful things to their own kids, a test that would weed out those that don't know newborns don't eat McNuggets and diapers need to be changed more than once a week.
Unfortunetly that idea goes against my nature. I don't want Government to have the ability to deny a prospective parent from having a kid.
Did anyone say it had to be the government?

There were so many candidates that I left to our own imaginations.dbackjon wrote:No need to bring Mark into this.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Of course we should. We need government to control all activities of nature for us. If some people crap their pants too much then bowel movements should be licensed also.

Cap'n Cat wrote:Did anyone say it had to be the government?
I assumed you and D were thinking alike on this question.D1B wrote:Hey dumbass. How ya gonna drive without the government settin the rules? How ya gonna get an education without the gubment? Who's gonna keep an eye on the qualification and licensing of doctors, engineers, pilots and others of whose hands you put your life, daily. Who keeps an eye on the environment and keeps us a safe distance from crime?
In fact, you'd be dead right now without the government. Jackass.


Well, you have my opinion. I am also the guy that would prefer that you had to pass a simple test to vote in a Federal election. You would think I was the antichrist for suggesting that, but in my world our Fed Gov would be darn near impotent in involvement in your personal life. So it really wouldn't matter so much.Cap'n Cat wrote:I'm just looking for discussion.








Pwns wrote:I'd like it if only responsible people had kids. I'd also like it if delicious, nutritious, and low-calorie pepperoni pizza grew on bamboo. We all have daydreams like this that will never come true.
It's just not worth giving the government the right to decide who gets to reproduce.
Well, a license implies required minimum qualifications to do something. You do it without a license, then some entity would have to enforce compliance. Typically it's the government through civil or criminal laws and punishments. No pain, no compliance.Cap'n Cat wrote:Pwns wrote:I'd like it if only responsible people had kids. I'd also like it if delicious, nutritious, and low-calorie pepperoni pizza grew on bamboo. We all have daydreams like this that will never come true.
It's just not worth giving the government the right to decide who gets to reproduce.
Again, why does it have to be the government?







How about churches?Cap'n Cat wrote:Pwns wrote:I'd like it if only responsible people had kids. I'd also like it if delicious, nutritious, and low-calorie pepperoni pizza grew on bamboo. We all have daydreams like this that will never come true.
It's just not worth giving the government the right to decide who gets to reproduce.
Again, why does it have to be the government?

...not everyone belongs to a church or is religious?ASUMountaineer wrote:How about churches?Cap'n Cat wrote:
Again, why does it have to be the government?




Nice one Angler!!ASUMountaineer wrote:How about churches?Cap'n Cat wrote:
Again, why does it have to be the government?


Me niether, but the alternative is the government having to raise the unwanted kid....sorry, but I'd rather weed them out on the front side so I don't have to support them....bobbythekidd wrote:As many horrible parents are out there and as often as we hear stories of people doing awful things to their own kids, a test that would weed out those that don't know newborns don't eat McNuggets and diapers need to be changed more than once a week.
Unfortunetly that idea goes against my nature. I don't want Government to have the ability to deny a prospective parent from having a kid.


danefan wrote:Yup - just like there should be a scale in women's clothing stores. Certain items of clothing (tube tops, thongs, stretch pants, etc.) shouldn't be available for purchase by any woman over the weight limit.