Dick Cheney: Memory Loss or Just Another Conk Dumbfuck?

[JoltinJoe]

Maybe it took my three times to get it right, but you have no idea how I got that coding to work.

It has got to be tough to compose through a thick, toxic cloud of rage and envy.

It had nothing to with the composition. What was hard was the computer coding. Here is a page from the same dictionary. Let's see if you can create a hot link reading "JoltinJoe" which opens to the pronunciation of the word.

I'll be waiting here.

http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.c ... ish/genius" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[houndawg]

Keep it up TMan you are working these freeloading leftwing nut jobs. You are kicking their ass so bad they are shitting Air Jordan's. Size 12 extra fat

ALPACAJIZ1, sucking my dick and copying my wise cracks.

Is he better at the first than he is at the second?

[travelinman67]

Your Gallup Obama numbers are significantly different from other polls.

If you had a problem with Gallup's numbers you should have said that to begin with, though. Not "they don't include Obama's numbers."

Because when presented with Obama's numbers... you're forced to backpedal to continue your argument.

Why is it that your Gallup link doesn't match what wikipedia quotes from Gallup, and further, doesn't even come close to the Quinnipiac numbers?

Again, this "prove it" request was initiated by Kalm as another time-waster...

...like all of the kalmdawg posts in this thread.

The exodus of business investment under Obama is well documented and even Obama has plead for increased investment...or do you need a link for that also?

The simple fact that yourself and other progressive ideologues blindly, unreservedly defend snd support every policy and act of this administration, eviscerates any potential for your argument's integrity.

Incessantly, this site's Donks resort to trollish personal attacks, rather than debate, as this thread has pathetically demonstrated, and when given the opportunity to argue progressive policy merits, they take a pass.

What does that say about the merits of progressivism?

I will acknowledge that you have stepped up and shown exceptional discipline staying reasonably focused.

Now, let's see if the debate can be elevated.

[D1B]

It has got to be tough to compose through a thick, toxic cloud of rage and envy.

It had nothing to with the composition. What was hard was the computer coding. Here is a page from the same dictionary. Let's see if you can create a hot link reading "JoltinJoe" which opens to the pronunciation of the word.

I'll be waiting here.



Joltin Joe

[D1B]

ALPACAJIZ1, sucking my dick and copying my wise cracks.

Is he better at the first than he is at the second?

Eh, he's not bad, but you have to shave his goatee and peel off all the cold sore scabs off his lips, or it kinda hurts, for weeks.

[JoltinJoe]

It had nothing to with the composition. What was hard was the computer coding. Here is a page from the same dictionary. Let's see if you can create a hot link reading "JoltinJoe" which opens to the pronunciation of the word.

I'll be waiting here.



Joltin Joe

Doesn't work.

Anyone can do what you just did. The assignment is to get the audible pronunciation of the word when you click on the link. Watch:

D1B

[travelinman67]

Joltin Joe

Doesn't work.

On so many levels.

[D1B]

If you had a problem with Gallup's numbers you should have said that to begin with, though. Not "they don't include Obama's numbers."

Because when presented with Obama's numbers... you're forced to backpedal to continue your argument.

Why is it that your Gallup link doesn't match what wikipedia quotes from Gallup, and further, doesn't even come close to the Quinnipiac numbers?

Again, this "prove it" request was initiated by Kalm as another time-waster...

...like all of the kalmdawg posts in this thread.

The exodus of business investment under Obama is well documented and even Obama has plead for increased investment...or do you need a link for that also?

The simple fact that yourself and other progressive ideologues blindly, unreservedly defend snd support every policy and act of this administration, eviscerates any potential for your argument's integrity.

Incessantly, this site's Donks resort to trollish personal attacks, rather than debate, as this thread has pathetically demonstrated, and when given the opportunity to argue progressive policy merits, they take a pass.

What does that say about the merits of progressivism?

I will acknowledge that you have stepped up and shown exceptional discipline staying reasonably focused.

Now, let's see if the debate can be elevated.

Typical conk fuck. This exact point was addressed in the Marx thread, you ignoramus.

Marx believed that wages would be held down by a "reserve army of labor," which he explained simply using classical economic techniques: Capitalists wish to pay as little as possible for labor, and this is easiest to do when there are too many workers floating around. Thus, after a recession, using a Marxist analysis, we would predict that high unemployment would keep wages stagnant as profits soared, because workers are too scared of unemployment to quit their terrible, exploitative jobs. And what do you know? No less an authority than the Wall Street Journal warns, "Lately, the U.S. recovery has been displaying some Marxian traits. Corporate profits are on a tear, and rising productivity has allowed companies to grow without doing much to reduce the vast ranks of the unemployed." That's because workers are terrified to leave their jobs and therefore lack bargaining power. It's no surprise that the best time for equitable growth is during times of "full employment," when unemployment is low and workers can threaten to take another job.

He's pleading for investment because corporate America swimming in trillions in cash and productivity is at an all time high. They're just sitting on it because they're simply greedy capitalist fucks and god forbid you announce a big expansion project during a negro's presidency.

[D1B]

It had nothing to with the composition. What was hard was the computer coding. Here is a page from the same dictionary. Let's see if you can create a hot link reading "JoltinJoe" which opens to the pronunciation of the word.

I'll be waiting here.



Joltin Joe

Doesn't work.

Anyone can do what you just did. The assignment is to get the audible pronunciation of the word when you click on the link. Watch:

D1B

Uh, Mr. Magoo, you need to be more clear with your instructions. Next time, mention key words like "audible."

That would have been just as easy, BTW.

[JoltinJoe]

Doesn't work.

Anyone can do what you just did. The assignment is to get the audible pronunciation of the word when you click on the link. Watch:

D1B

Uh, Mr. Magoo, you need to be more clear with your instructions. Next time, mention key words like "audible."

That would have been just as easy, BTW.

Can't do it.

BTW, my instructions were clear. I asked you to create a hot link to the pronunciation of the word.

You created a link to the definition page of the word.

[D1B]

Doesn't work.

On so many levels.

Actually it works and goes directly to the page he linked. Mission accomplished. The page also includes a text pronunciation key - ˈdʒiːniəs

Like you, your hero fucked up and left out vital information,like "audible." Hot linking to the sound file would have been a piece of cake too.

[JoltinJoe]

Hot linking to the sound file would have been a piece of cake too.

Then do it.

[D1B]

Uh, Mr. Magoo, you need to be more clear with your instructions. Next time, mention key words like "audible."

That would have been just as easy, BTW.

Can't do it.

BTW, my instructions were clear. I asked you to create a hot link to the pronunciation of the word.

You created a link to the definition page of the word.

Yep, and here they are. Directly from your page:

genius
noun
ˈdʒiːniəs

; ˈdʒiːniəs

Sorry Joe, your critical error was failing to qualify with "audible." You could have even more clear by saying "sound file."

Joe, you starting to regret getting involved? Your ass getting sore?

[JoltinJoe]

Joe, you starting to regret getting involved? Your ass getting sore?

Aw, no. Because even though you say linking to the sound file would be a breeze, you haven't done it.

Do it.

Meanwhile:

D1B

[ALPHAGRIZ1]

Keep it up TMan you are working these freeloading leftwing nut jobs. You are kicking their ass so bad they are shitting Air Jordan's. Size 12 extra fat

ALPACAJIZ1, sucking my dick and copying my wise cracks.

The only copying going on around here is your 3rd and 4th plate at Golden Corral.

[D1B]

Hot linking to the sound file would have been a piece of cake too.

Then do it.

D1B

[JoltinJoe]

Then do it.

D1B

Ok, now let's see if you just copied my coding, or whether you actually independently figured it out for yourself.

Link to the "sound file" for this word from another dictionary.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/genius" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

[D1B]

Jolt's kid after he leaves out key info, like which endzone to go to.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_iscHkT60w[/youtube]

[travelinman67]

Why is it that your Gallup link doesn't match what wikipedia quotes from Gallup, and further, doesn't even come close to the Quinnipiac numbers?

Again, this "prove it" request was initiated by Kalm as another time-waster...

...like all of the kalmdawg posts in this thread.

The exodus of business investment under Obama is well documented and even Obama has plead for increased investment...or do you need a link for that also?

The simple fact that yourself and other progressive ideologues blindly, unreservedly defend snd support every policy and act of this administration, eviscerates any potential for your argument's integrity.

Incessantly, this site's Donks resort to trollish personal attacks, rather than debate, as this thread has pathetically demonstrated, and when given the opportunity to argue progressive policy merits, they take a pass.

What does that say about the merits of progressivism?

I will acknowledge that you have stepped up and shown exceptional discipline staying reasonably focused.

Now, let's see if the debate can be elevated.

Typical conk fuck. This exact point was addressed in the Marx thread, you ignoramus.

Marx believed that wages would be held down by a "reserve army of labor," which he explained simply using classical economic techniques: Capitalists wish to pay as little as possible for labor, and this is easiest to do when there are too many workers floating around. Thus, after a recession, using a Marxist analysis, we would predict that high unemployment would keep wages stagnant as profits soared, because workers are too scared of unemployment to quit their terrible, exploitative jobs. And what do you know? No less an authority than the Wall Street Journal warns, "Lately, the U.S. recovery has been displaying some Marxian traits. Corporate profits are on a tear, and rising productivity has allowed companies to grow without doing much to reduce the vast ranks of the unemployed." That's because workers are terrified to leave their jobs and therefore lack bargaining power. It's no surprise that the best time for equitable growth is during times of "full employment," when unemployment is low and workers can threaten to take another job.

He's pleading for investment because corporate America swimming in trillions in cash and productivity is at an all time high. They're just sitting on it because they're simply greedy capitalist fucks and god forbid you announce a big expansion project during a negro's presidency.

Ohhhh....sooo close!

...Or refuse to contribute to a rogue, socialist, separatist, unconstitutional, lawless government.

[D1B]

D1B

Ok, now let's see if you just copied my coding, or whether you actually independently figured it out for yourself.

Link to the "sound file" for this word from another dictionary.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/genius" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Uhhh, wrong again, Bill Gates. You're like 60 years old, so this is fascinating to you, but not me.

I right clicked the mp3 button, then chose "Inspect Element Q"

Scrolled down until I saw the mp3 code, which was already composed in the proper format.

Copied

Pasted it into URL function on this page, but had to insert like this:
D1B

Done.

[D1B]

Typical conk fuck. This exact point was addressed in the Marx thread, you ignoramus.



He's pleading for investment because corporate America swimming in trillions in cash and productivity is at an all time high. They're just sitting on it because they're simply greedy capitalist fucks and god forbid you announce a big expansion project during a negro's presidency.

Ohhhh....sooo close!

...Or refuse to contribute to a rogue, socialist, separatist, unconstitutional, lawless government.

Tman, I love you, but you're seriously fucked in the head with this shit. California is killing you.

[JoltinJoe]

Ok, now let's see if you just copied my coding, or whether you actually independently figured it out for yourself.

Link to the "sound file" for this word from another dictionary.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/genius" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Uhhh, wrong again, Bill Gates. You're like 60 years old, so this is fascinating to you, but not me.

I right clicked the mp3 button, then chose "Inspect Element Q"

Scrolled down until I saw the mp3 code, which was already composed in the proper format.

Copied

Pasted it into URL function on this page, but had to insert like this:
D1B

Done.

Good job, Google boy.

Another thing I forced you to learn.

Now try the link to the Merriam Webster definition.

[D1B]

Ok, now let's see if you just copied my coding, or whether you actually independently figured it out for yourself.

Link to the "sound file" for this word from another dictionary.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/genius" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Uhhh, wrong again, Bill Gates. You're like 60 years old, so this is fascinating to you, but not me.

I right clicked the mp3 button, then chose "Inspect Element Q"

Scrolled down until I saw the mp3 code, which was already composed in the proper format.

Copied

Pasted it into URL function on this page, but had to insert like this:
D1B

Done.

Here it is:

<div class="sound audio_play_button pron-uk icon-audio" data-src-mp3="http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.c ... __gb_1.mp3" data-src-ogg="http://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.c ... __gb_1.ogg" title=" pronunciation English" style="cursor: pointer" valign="top">&nbsp;<!-- End of DIV sound audio_play_button pron-uk icon-audio--></div>

[kalm]

If you had a problem with Gallup's numbers you should have said that to begin with, though. Not "they don't include Obama's numbers."

Because when presented with Obama's numbers... you're forced to backpedal to continue your argument.

Why is it that your Gallup link doesn't match what wikipedia quotes from Gallup, and further, doesn't even come close to the Quinnipiac numbers?

Again, this "prove it" request was initiated by Kalm as another time-waster...

...like all of the kalmdawg posts in this thread.

The exodus of business investment under Obama is well documented and even Obama has plead for increased investment...or do you need a link for that also?

The simple fact that yourself and other progressive ideologues blindly, unreservedly defend snd support every policy and act of this administration, eviscerates any potential for your argument's integrity.

Incessantly, this site's Donks resort to trollish personal attacks, rather than debate, as this thread has pathetically demonstrated, and when given the opportunity to argue progressive policy merits, they take a pass.

What does that say about the merits of progressivism?

I will acknowledge that you have stepped up and shown exceptional discipline staying reasonably focused.

Now, let's see if the debate can be elevated.

I honestly had not seen where Obama had the worst approval numbers as you suggested so I took your later advice and googled it.

BTW, you have me confused with someone who supports Obama, just like you are confused about Obama being a progressive.

Run of the mill conk smack…not even all that inventive. Yawn...

[D1B]

Uhhh, wrong again, Bill Gates. You're like 60 years old, so this is fascinating to you, but not me.

I right clicked the mp3 button, then chose "Inspect Element Q"

Scrolled down until I saw the mp3 code, which was already composed in the proper format.

Copied

Pasted it into URL function on this page, but had to insert like this:
D1B

Done.

Good job, Google boy.

Another thing I forced you to learn.

Now try the link to the Merriam Webster definition.

I bet your students hate your guts.