Fair Tax
- windwalker
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:23 am
- I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina U
- Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Fair Tax
This is something that will benefit all .. Far Left -- Middle -- Far right...
http://www.fairtax.org
http://www.fairtax.org
The next game is the most important game of the year!!
- Cal Poly Mustang
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:59 pm
- I am a fan of: Cal Poly
Re: Fair Tax
It screws those that have Roth retirement accounts by making them pay taxes twice. They'll pay once when the money was initially earned, and once more when they actually want to spend their retirement money. Not exactly fair in my book. I did read in their FAQ that if a senior citizen buys a used car, or used clothes they don't have to pay the tax. Whew, that's a relief.
Re: Fair Tax
Since this replaces the income tax, they would not pay on the money earned that went into the roth.
- Cal Poly Mustang
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:59 pm
- I am a fan of: Cal Poly
Re: Fair Tax
I have Roth retirement accounts funded with money that I've already paid taxes on. If the fair tax was implemented, how would I avoid getting taxed twice?
Re: Fair Tax
I assume you meant if done so after implementation. My misunderstanding.
Someone would get nailed one way or another if there was ever a conversion. A lot a variables there. However, some of us are getting nailed now. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Funny that we're talking as if this could ever really happen.
Someone would get nailed one way or another if there was ever a conversion. A lot a variables there. However, some of us are getting nailed now. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. Funny that we're talking as if this could ever really happen.
- lizrdgizrd
- Level2
- Posts: 808
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:46 pm
- I am a fan of: Appalachian State
- Location: The Bull City
Re: Fair Tax
I'm pretty sure that Roths would be exempted and new ones wouldn't be available anymore.Cal Poly Mustang wrote:I have Roth retirement accounts funded with money that I've already paid taxes on. If the fair tax was implemented, how would I avoid getting taxed twice?
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:12 am
- I am a fan of: UCA
Re: Fair Tax
That's simple, non-taxable distribution.Cal Poly Mustang wrote:I have Roth retirement accounts funded with money that I've already paid taxes on. If the fair tax was implemented, how would I avoid getting taxed twice?
Re: Fair Tax
The Fair Tax would pay a monthly prebate to anyone that is at or below the poverty line and on fixed incomes. Therefore, as a retired person you would receive a monthly check from the government to cover the amount of sales taxes paid on necessities, such as food clothing and housing, making your purchases basicly tax free. Estimates are as much as $400.00 per month.Cal Poly Mustang wrote:I have Roth retirement accounts funded with money that I've already paid taxes on. If the fair tax was implemented, how would I avoid getting taxed twice?
- Cal Poly Mustang
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:59 pm
- I am a fan of: Cal Poly
Re: Fair Tax
When I retire I'll be on a fixed income, but I'm damn sure not going to be at or below the poverty line. I don't plan on retiring and becoming poor. I agree with Purple Pride, in order to be fair to those with Roth accounts the money from these accounts should remain untaxed. Unfortunately, the Not-so-Fair Tax web page doesn't say that's the case with Roth accounts. At least not as far I as I could find. The government basically told people when they opened Roth accounts that the money would be tax free when they were able to take distributions from it. That's the deal I signed up for, and that's the deal I expect the government to keep. I don't think the Fair Tax is going to get very far if they don't address issues like this. I can't imagine anyone with a Roth account would think that this is good idea.coastal89 wrote:The Fair Tax would pay a monthly prebate to anyone that is at or below the poverty line and on fixed incomes. Therefore, as a retired person you would receive a monthly check from the government to cover the amount of sales taxes paid on necessities, such as food clothing and housing, making your purchases basicly tax free. Estimates are as much as $400.00 per month.
- windwalker
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:23 am
- I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina U
- Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Re: Fair Tax
Here is the portion of the Repulican Candidate's debate that was shown on ABC about the Fair Tax.
The next game is the most important game of the year!!
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:26 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Southern
- A.K.A.: BoroNative
Re: Fair Tax
The benefit out weighs the costs, even for those with Roth'sCal Poly Mustang wrote:It screws those that have Roth retirement accounts by making them pay taxes twice. They'll pay once when the money was initially earned, and once more when they actually want to spend their retirement money. Not exactly fair in my book. I did read in their FAQ that if a senior citizen buys a used car, or used clothes they don't have to pay the tax. Whew, that's a relief.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 4:26 pm
- I am a fan of: Georgia Southern
- A.K.A.: BoroNative
Re: Fair Tax
Prebates go to everyone. Amounts differ based on dependents.coastal89 wrote:The Fair Tax would pay a monthly prebate to anyone that is at or below the poverty line and on fixed incomes. Therefore, as a retired person you would receive a monthly check from the government to cover the amount of sales taxes paid on necessities, such as food clothing and housing, making your purchases basicly tax free. Estimates are as much as $400.00 per month.Cal Poly Mustang wrote:I have Roth retirement accounts funded with money that I've already paid taxes on. If the fair tax was implemented, how would I avoid getting taxed twice?
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 9:22 am
- I am a fan of: Montana State
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 12387
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:39 pm
- I am a fan of: Firing Mark Farley
- A.K.A.: Bikinis for JSO
- Location: The Panther State
Re: Fair Tax
We need the Fair Tax!
If fascism ever comes to America, it will come in the name of liberalism. Ronald Reagan, 1975.
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
Progressivism is cancer
All my posts are satire
- BlueHen86
- Supporter
- Posts: 13555
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
- I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
- A.K.A.: Duffman
- Location: Area XI
Re: Fair Tax
Why settle?HI54UNI wrote:We need the Fair Tax!
I demand an excellent tax!
-
- Level3
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 pm
- I am a fan of: Furman
- Location: Greenville SC
Re: Fair Tax
There are lots of things that I love about the fair tax.
here are two concerns.
1) The prebates reduce the taxes paid particularly on the lower incomes. Since the rich spend a smaller amount of their incomes they are going to pay a smaller amount of the required taxes. So the bulk of the taxes will fall on the middle class as a percentage of income?
2) I realize we have an underground economy now to avoid income and payroll taxes, but wouldn't it get worse to avoid a very large sales tax?
As I said I like the fair tax, but it would only work if you repeal 16th amendment and figure out a way to permanently slow down federal spending. I just don't see it working any other way.
here are two concerns.
1) The prebates reduce the taxes paid particularly on the lower incomes. Since the rich spend a smaller amount of their incomes they are going to pay a smaller amount of the required taxes. So the bulk of the taxes will fall on the middle class as a percentage of income?
2) I realize we have an underground economy now to avoid income and payroll taxes, but wouldn't it get worse to avoid a very large sales tax?
As I said I like the fair tax, but it would only work if you repeal 16th amendment and figure out a way to permanently slow down federal spending. I just don't see it working any other way.
- CID1990
- Level5
- Posts: 25478
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
- I am a fan of: Pie
- A.K.A.: CID 1990
- Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร
Re: Fair Tax
Isn't Forbes for this?
It must be bad if a rich dude is in favor
It must be bad if a rich dude is in favor
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
-
- Level3
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 pm
- I am a fan of: Furman
- Location: Greenville SC
Re: Fair Tax
CID1990 wrote:Isn't Forbes for this?
It must be bad if a rich dude is in favor
I thought he was for the flat tax
Re: Fair Tax
Six posters in this thread with <50 post count. Weird.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
Re: Fair Tax
As far as to point #2, income taxes are assessed and paid on an individual level. That alone makes it much easier for people to willfully avoid paying taxes. Just like state sales taxes, the The Fair Tax will require businesses to be the ones filing and remitting the tax. For compliance purposes, and by its very structure, it is much easier to "go after" businesses than it is individuals.OL FU wrote:There are lots of things that I love about the fair tax.
here are two concerns.
1) The prebates reduce the taxes paid particularly on the lower incomes. Since the rich spend a smaller amount of their incomes they are going to pay a smaller amount of the required taxes. So the bulk of the taxes will fall on the middle class as a percentage of income?
2) I realize we have an underground economy now to avoid income and payroll taxes, but wouldn't it get worse to avoid a very large sales tax?
As I said I like the fair tax, but it would only work if you repeal 16th amendment and figure out a way to permanently slow down federal spending. I just don't see it working any other way.
Enforcing non compliance for businesses who willfully fail to comply must be swift and severe.
That alone has been a problem with the IRS. Slow to react and letting people off way too easily.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Fair Tax
Unless that business is a perceived "conservative" business....Baldy wrote:As far as to point #2, income taxes are assessed and paid on an individual level. That alone makes it much easier for people to willfully avoid paying taxes. Just like state sales taxes, the The Fair Tax will require businesses to be the ones filing and remitting the tax. For compliance purposes, and by its very structure, it is much easier to "go after" businesses than it is individuals.OL FU wrote:There are lots of things that I love about the fair tax.
here are two concerns.
1) The prebates reduce the taxes paid particularly on the lower incomes. Since the rich spend a smaller amount of their incomes they are going to pay a smaller amount of the required taxes. So the bulk of the taxes will fall on the middle class as a percentage of income?
2) I realize we have an underground economy now to avoid income and payroll taxes, but wouldn't it get worse to avoid a very large sales tax?
As I said I like the fair tax, but it would only work if you repeal 16th amendment and figure out a way to permanently slow down federal spending. I just don't see it working any other way.
Enforcing non compliance for businesses who willfully fail to comply must be swift and severe.
That alone has been a problem with the IRS. Slow to react and letting people off way too easily.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
-
- Level3
- Posts: 4335
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 pm
- I am a fan of: Furman
- Location: Greenville SC
Re: Fair Tax
Yes. That was another point I was going to make. The penalty for non-compliance must be a deterrent. Another way of looking at it though is that as opposed to the IRS being slow (which they are), is income taxes at least come from the individual's own money. If a business doesn't remit the consumption tax, they are stealing plan and simple.Baldy wrote:As far as to point #2, income taxes are assessed and paid on an individual level. That alone makes it much easier for people to willfully avoid paying taxes. Just like state sales taxes, the The Fair Tax will require businesses to be the ones filing and remitting the tax. For compliance purposes, and by its very structure, it is much easier to "go after" businesses than it is individuals.OL FU wrote:There are lots of things that I love about the fair tax.
here are two concerns.
1) The prebates reduce the taxes paid particularly on the lower incomes. Since the rich spend a smaller amount of their incomes they are going to pay a smaller amount of the required taxes. So the bulk of the taxes will fall on the middle class as a percentage of income?
2) I realize we have an underground economy now to avoid income and payroll taxes, but wouldn't it get worse to avoid a very large sales tax?
As I said I like the fair tax, but it would only work if you repeal 16th amendment and figure out a way to permanently slow down federal spending. I just don't see it working any other way.
Enforcing non compliance for businesses who willfully fail to comply must be swift and severe.That alone has been a problem with the IRS. Slow to react and letting people off way too easily.
Re: Fair Tax
Exactly, and that makes it much easier to enforce and prosecute offenders.OL FU wrote:Yes. That was another point I was going to make. The penalty for non-compliance must be a deterrent. Another way of looking at it though is that as opposed to the IRS being slow (which they are), is income taxes at least come from the individual's own money. If a business doesn't remit the consumption tax, they are stealing plan and simple.Baldy wrote: As far as to point #2, income taxes are assessed and paid on an individual level. That alone makes it much easier for people to willfully avoid paying taxes. Just like state sales taxes, the The Fair Tax will require businesses to be the ones filing and remitting the tax. For compliance purposes, and by its very structure, it is much easier to "go after" businesses than it is individuals.
Enforcing non compliance for businesses who willfully fail to comply must be swift and severe.That alone has been a problem with the IRS. Slow to react and letting people off way too easily.
Re: Fair Tax
Not really, the Fair Tax is pretty plain and straightforward, in black and white, and easily verifiable through a routine and simple audit. It would be much more difficult for the IRS to target anyone based on their political viewpoints.AZGrizFan wrote:Unless that business is a perceived "conservative" business....Baldy wrote: As far as to point #2, income taxes are assessed and paid on an individual level. That alone makes it much easier for people to willfully avoid paying taxes. Just like state sales taxes, the The Fair Tax will require businesses to be the ones filing and remitting the tax. For compliance purposes, and by its very structure, it is much easier to "go after" businesses than it is individuals.
Enforcing non compliance for businesses who willfully fail to comply must be swift and severe.
That alone has been a problem with the IRS. Slow to react and letting people off way too easily.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Fair Tax
Mmmmm....you missed my point. The IRS is CURRENTLY slow to react and lets people off too easily, UNLESS you're perceived as a "conservative" business.Baldy wrote:Not really, the Fair Tax is pretty plain and straightforward, in black and white, and easily verifiable through a routine and simple audit. It would be much more difficult for the IRS to target anyone based on their political viewpoints.AZGrizFan wrote:
Unless that business is a perceived "conservative" business....
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12