The nub of the climate change thing problem

Political discussions
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by JMU DJ »

AZGrizFan wrote:
kalm wrote:
I did. It came up jibberish. Did you mean google "southern sea ice..." Or search NOAA's website? :dunce:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global-snow/2014/5" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Sweet Jesus you libs are lazy. :ohno: :ohno:

Image
The May 2014 Southern Hemisphere sea ice extent was 12.03 million square km (4.64 million square miles), 1.24 million square km (470,000 square miles), or 11.5 percent, above the 1981-2010 average. This ranked as the largest Antarctic sea ice extent on record, surpassing the May 2000 Antarctic sea ice extent by 370,000 square km (140,000 square miles), approximately the size of Japan. This marked the 17th consecutive month with much above average sea ice extent in the Southern Hemisphere and the second consecutive month with record large sea ice. In fact, six of the last 12 months have had record large sea ice extent in the Southern Hemisphere. Much of the above-average ice extent occurred in the Weddell Sea off the West Antarctic coast, with above-average sea ice in nearly every region. Southern Hemisphere sea ice extent during May is increasing at an average rate of 2.5 percent per decade with substantial interannual variability.


When combining the Northern and Southern Hemisphere sea ice extents, the globally-averaged sea ice extent during May was 24.81 million square km (9.58 million square miles), 2.6 percent above the 1981-2010 average and the sixth largest May global sea ice extent on record. Global sea ice extent during May is decreasing at an average rate of 0.1 percent per decade.

You are focusing on just sea ice. Land ice in Antarctica has continued to decrease. Further, you are also looking at one portion of the globe.

Image
Image

Where you like to focus on the "record" increases in antarctic sea ice, arctic sea ice has been declining and continues to reach record lows. Why don't you talk about that too?

A study in Nature found that though sea ice levels have fluctuated over the last 1400 years, the last hundred have been unprecedented:

Image


In fact, current sea ice level decline in the arctic is proceeding faster the IPCC models.

Image

So, if you want to focus on one section of the globe, looking at such a short time period, based on data that has been shown to be the results of changes in Ozone, weather patterns, ocean current, etc to make your point. Go right ahead.
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 62363
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by kalm »

JMU DJ wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global-snow/2014/5" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Sweet Jesus you libs are lazy. :ohno: :ohno:

Image

You are focusing on just sea ice. Land ice in Antarctica has continued to decrease. Further, you are also looking at one portion of the globe.

Image
Image

Where you like to focus on the "record" increases in antarctic sea ice, arctic sea ice has been declining and continues to reach record lows. Why don't you talk about that too?

A study in Nature found that though sea ice levels have fluctuated over the last 1400 years, the last hundred have been unprecedented:

Image


In fact, current sea ice level decline in the arctic is proceeding faster the IPCC models.

Image

So, if you want to focus on one section of the globe, looking at such a short time period, based on data that has been shown to be the results of changes in Ozone, weather patterns, ocean current, etc to make your point. Go right ahead.
Took you long enough. :coffee:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by JMU DJ »

kalm wrote:
Took you long enough. :coffee:
:lol:

Jesus, I looked back like 1 or 2 pages on this thread.

Image
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by AZGrizFan »

JMU DJ wrote: So, if you want to focus on one section of the globe, looking at such a short time period, based on data that has been shown to be the results of changes in Ozone, weather patterns, ocean current, etc to make your point. Go right ahead.
I see. So what's going on in the ANTArctic is because of changes in Ozone, weather patterns, ocean current, etc., but what's going on in the ARCTIC is because of anthropologic global warming.

Gotcha. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by JMU DJ »

AZGrizFan wrote:
JMU DJ wrote: So, if you want to focus on one section of the globe, looking at such a short time period, based on data that has been shown to be the results of changes in Ozone, weather patterns, ocean current, etc to make your point. Go right ahead.
I see. So what's going on in the ANTArctic is because of changes in Ozone, weather patterns, ocean current, etc., but what's going on in the ARCTIC is because of anthropologic global warming.

Gotcha. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Not at all what I'm saying, sir. If you can point out where I said anything about anthropologic global warming above, please be my guest. What I'm saying is that you can't pick one side of the globe without paying attention to the rest. I honestly have no clue what's at the "nub" of ice change, those are theories above that can apply to the arctic too, and I know for a fact they have, particularly in the instances of changes in weather. But carry on, please. :coffee:
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by AZGrizFan »

JMU DJ wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
I see. So what's going on in the ANTArctic is because of changes in Ozone, weather patterns, ocean current, etc., but what's going on in the ARCTIC is because of anthropologic global warming.

Gotcha. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Not at all what I'm saying, sir. If you can point out where I said anything about anthropologic global warming above, please be my guest. What I'm saying is that you can't pick one side of the globe without paying attention to the rest. I honestly have no clue what's at the "nub" of ice change, those are theories above that can apply to the arctic too, and I know for a fact they have, particularly in the instances of changes in weather. But carry on, please. :coffee:
"has been shown to be the results of..." Sounds like you think you DO have a clue about the "nub"...settled science, right? :coffee:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by JMU DJ »

AZGrizFan wrote:
JMU DJ wrote:
Not at all what I'm saying, sir. If you can point out where I said anything about anthropologic global warming above, please be my guest. What I'm saying is that you can't pick one side of the globe without paying attention to the rest. I honestly have no clue what's at the "nub" of ice change, those are theories above that can apply to the arctic too, and I know for a fact they have, particularly in the instances of changes in weather. But carry on, please. :coffee:
"has been shown to be the results of..." Sounds like you think you DO have a clue about the "nub"...settled science, right? :coffee:
Nope, didn't say settled either just "shown" and "results." You sure do like putting words in peoples mouths. I presented multiple different theories that are the results of scientific studies, some of which the authors attribute to changes in weather patterns, some attribute to changes in climate, some attribute to changes in the jet stream, some attribute to ozone. Sounds settled, right? :sarcasm: Any actual comments on the data above though or do you just feel like attacking the person who is delivering the message, Mr. Coffee ;)
Image
User avatar
Chizzang
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19273
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
Location: Soon to be Eden Prairie...

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by Chizzang »

JMU DJ wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
"has been shown to be the results of..." Sounds like you think you DO have a clue about the "nub"...settled science, right? :coffee:
Nope, didn't say settled either just "shown" and "results." You sure do like putting words in peoples mouths. I presented multiple different theories that are the results of scientific studies, some of which the authors attribute to changes in weather patterns, some attribute to changes in climate, some attribute to changes in the jet stream, some attribute to ozone. Sounds settled, right? :sarcasm: Any actual comments on the data above though or do you just feel like attacking the person who is delivering the message, Mr. Coffee ;)


He's been grumpy all morning... :ohno:
I would hug him right now if I were you - he needs a hug - badly
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
User avatar
travelinman67
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 9884
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:51 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State Vikings
A.K.A.: Modern Man
Location: Where the 1st Amendment still exists: CS.com

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by travelinman67 »

JMU DJ wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
I see. So what's going on in the ANTArctic is because of changes in Ozone, weather patterns, ocean current, etc., but what's going on in the ARCTIC is because of anthropologic global warming.

Gotcha. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Not at all what I'm saying, sir. If you can point out where I said anything about anthropologic global warming above, please be my guest. What I'm saying is that you can't pick one side of the globe without paying attention to the rest. I honestly have no clue what's at the "nub" of ice change, those are theories above that can apply to the arctic too, and I know for a fact they have, particularly in the instances of changes in weather. But carry on, please. :coffee:
Actual data, not "reconstruction" or "projections"...

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/02/a ... ore-112348

Ocean around antarctic has been cooling over the past decade.

BTW, the NSIDC Cryo-sat "analysis" is infamous for cherry picking time periods to skew results.
"That is how government works - we tell you what you can do today."
- EPA Kommissar Gina McCarthy
User avatar
JMU DJ
Level4
Level4
Posts: 6263
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: Leeeeeeroy Jeeeenkins

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by JMU DJ »

travelinman67 wrote:
JMU DJ wrote:
Not at all what I'm saying, sir. If you can point out where I said anything about anthropologic global warming above, please be my guest. What I'm saying is that you can't pick one side of the globe without paying attention to the rest. I honestly have no clue what's at the "nub" of ice change, those are theories above that can apply to the arctic too, and I know for a fact they have, particularly in the instances of changes in weather. But carry on, please. :coffee:
Actual data, not "reconstruction" or "projections"...

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/07/02/a ... ore-112348

Ocean around antarctic has been cooling over the past decade.

BTW, the NSIDC Cryo-sat "analysis" is infamous for cherry picking time periods to skew results.
That is actual data above (the 1400 sea ice in the arctic is a reconstruction, but it contains satellite data. Also, the IPCC graph is a projection, yes, but if you see the red line, actual, physical data), so maybe I'm confused as to what you consider "Actual Data."

You seem to be having the same issue as Z, you are only focusing on the Antarctic Records. Why aren't you talking about the records in the Arctic as well? Does sea ice increase in one part of the world give the big picture as to what is happening globally?

As much as I respect blogs for keeping scientist honest, I try not to get my scientific data/information from them. So since we're only talking about the Antarctic, let's look at some science from that area. On you Watt's blog, he uses data to show cooling. The data he is using to show his point is that "Surface" temperatures have been cooling. This publication in a Nature journal discusses that issue.
Changes in sea ice significantly modulate climate change because of its high reflective and strong insulating nature. In contrast to Arctic sea ice, sea ice surrounding Antarctica has expanded1, with record extent2 in 2010. This ice expansion has previously been attributed to dynamical atmospheric changes that induce atmospheric cooling3. Here we show that accelerated basal melting of Antarctic ice shelves is likely to have contributed significantly to sea-ice expansion. Specifically, we present observations indicating that melt water from Antarctica’s ice shelves accumulates in a cool and fresh surface layer that shields the surface ocean from the warmer deeper waters that are melting the ice shelves. Simulating these processes in a coupled climate model we find that cool and fresh surface water from ice-shelf melt indeed leads to expanding sea ice in austral autumn and winter. This powerful negative feedback counteracts Southern Hemispheric atmospheric warming. Although changes in atmospheric dynamics most likely govern regional sea-ice trends4, our analyses indicate that the overall sea-ice trend is dominated by increased ice-shelf melt. We suggest that cool sea surface temperatures around Antarctica could offset projected snowfall increases in Antarctica, with implications for estimates of future sea-level rise.
http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v6/n ... o1767.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


Warmer deeper waters you say?
Freshening and warming of Antarctic Bottom Water (AABW) between the 1980s and 2000s are quantified, assessing the relative contributions of water-mass changes and isotherm heave. The analysis uses highly accurate, full-depth, ship-based, conductivity–temperature–depth measurements taken along repeated oceanographic sections around the Southern Ocean. Fresher varieties of AABW are present within the South Pacific and south Indian Oceans in the 2000s compared to the 1990s, with the strongest freshening in the newest waters adjacent to the Antarctic continental slope and rise indicating a recent shift in the salinity of AABW produced in this region. Bottom waters in the Weddell Sea exhibit significantly less water-mass freshening than those in the other two southern basins. However, a decrease in the volume of the coldest, deepest waters is observed throughout the entire Southern Ocean. This isotherm heave causes a salinification and warming on isobaths from the bottom up to the shallow potential temperature maximum. The water-mass freshening of AABW in the Indian and Pacific Ocean sectors is equivalent to a freshwater flux of 73 ± 26 Gt yr−1, roughly half of the estimated recent mass loss of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Isotherm heave integrated below 2000 m and south of 30°S equates to a net heat uptake of 34 ± 14 TW of excess energy entering the deep ocean from deep volume loss of AABW and 0.37 ± 0.15 mm yr−1 of sea level rise from associated thermal expansion.
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10. ... 12-00834.1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


As for the NSIDC data source that you are discrediting, are you bringing that up to discount the NOAA data I provided or was that in regards to the NOAA data that Z provided?


This seems relevant to quote as well:
Attack the source.

Contribute nothing.

Demand more proof.

Waste their time.
Sound familiar?
Image
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by BlueHen86 »

JMU DJ wrote: This seems relevant to quote as well:
Attack the source.

Contribute nothing.

Demand more proof.

Waste their time.
Sound familiar?
It's all he's got. I think he's paid to say/post the shit he does, but he must not be paid well enough to come up with anything original.
User avatar
travelinman67
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 9884
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:51 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State Vikings
A.K.A.: Modern Man
Location: Where the 1st Amendment still exists: CS.com

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by travelinman67 »

JMU DJ wrote: ...You seem to be having the same issue as Z, you are only focusing on the Antarctic Records. Why aren't you talking about the records in the Arctic as well? Does sea ice increase in one part of the world give the big picture as to what is happening globally?...
Yet remarkably, the Alarmists ignore the Antarctic data when it doesn't suit their agenda. And since the Antarctic is approximately 11% larger, I'm sure you would agree the Antarctic climate activity has a larger effect on global climate patterns.
JMU DJ wrote: ...As much as I respect blogs for keeping scientist honest, I try not to get my scientific data/information from them....
And I avoid NOAA for climate data...they've repeatedly been caught posting false information, and their "Hansen" models have been nuked, yet they still treat them as gospel. :dunce:
JMU DJ wrote: ...As for the NSIDC data source that you are discrediting, are you bringing that up to discount the NOAA data I provided or was that in regards to the NOAA data that Z provided? ...
As three of your four graphs cited are based upon NSIDC "data", my critical remark was directed at your source.

This seems relevant to quote as well:

Attack the source.

Contribute nothing.

Demand more proof.

Waste their time.

Sound familiar?
Quite frankly, my statement is irrelevant to your post. It is, completely relevant to Kalm, BlueHen86, Houndawg, and (sometimes) Skjellyfetti, who reply to each conk post with inane blather. Unequivocally, consistently they;
Attack the source, Contribute nothing, Demand more proof, and waste everyone's time.

I do not categorize you with the aforementioned trolls, as you engage and debate. We may disagree, but I respect your opinion.
"That is how government works - we tell you what you can do today."
- EPA Kommissar Gina McCarthy
User avatar
BlueHen86
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 13555
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 5:40 pm
I am a fan of: The McManus Brothers
A.K.A.: Duffman
Location: Area XI

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by BlueHen86 »

travelinman67 wrote:
JMU DJ wrote: ...You seem to be having the same issue as Z, you are only focusing on the Antarctic Records. Why aren't you talking about the records in the Arctic as well? Does sea ice increase in one part of the world give the big picture as to what is happening globally?...
Yet remarkably, the Alarmists ignore the Antarctic data when it doesn't suit their agenda. And since the Antarctic is approximately 11% larger, I'm sure you would agree the Antarctic climate activity has a larger effect on global climate patterns.
JMU DJ wrote: ...As much as I respect blogs for keeping scientist honest, I try not to get my scientific data/information from them....
And I avoid NOAA for climate data...they've repeatedly been caught posting false information, and their "Hansen" models have been nuked, yet they still treat them as gospel. :dunce:
JMU DJ wrote: ...As for the NSIDC data source that you are discrediting, are you bringing that up to discount the NOAA data I provided or was that in regards to the NOAA data that Z provided? ...
As three of your four graphs cited are based upon NSIDC "data", my critical remark was directed at your source.

This seems relevant to quote as well:

Attack the source.

Contribute nothing.

Demand more proof.

Waste their time.

Sound familiar?
Quite frankly, my statement is irrelevant to your post. It is, completely relevant to Kalm, BlueHen86, Houndawg, and (sometimes) Skjellyfetti, who reply to each conk post with inane blather. Unequivocally, consistently they;
Attack the source, Contribute nothing, Demand more proof, and waste everyone's time.

I do not categorize you with the aforementioned trolls, as you engage and debate. We may disagree, but I respect your opinion.
That is a universal truth for almost all of your posts. :lol:
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 62363
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by kalm »

BlueHen86 wrote:
travelinman67 wrote:
Yet remarkably, the Alarmists ignore the Antarctic data when it doesn't suit their agenda. And since the Antarctic is approximately 11% larger, I'm sure you would agree the Antarctic climate activity has a larger effect on global climate patterns.



And I avoid NOAA for climate data...they've repeatedly been caught posting false information, and their "Hansen" models have been nuked, yet they still treat them as gospel. :dunce:



As three of your four graphs cited are based upon NSIDC "data", my critical remark was directed at your source.



Quite frankly, my statement is irrelevant to your post. It is, completely relevant to Kalm, BlueHen86, Houndawg, and (sometimes) Skjellyfetti, who reply to each conk post with inane blather. Unequivocally, consistently they;
Attack the source, Contribute nothing, Demand more proof, and waste everyone's time.

I do not categorize you with the aforementioned trolls, as you engage and debate. We may disagree, but I respect your opinion.
That is a universal truth for almost all of your posts. :lol:
:lol:
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by AZGrizFan »

JMU DJ wrote:
AZGrizFan wrote:
"has been shown to be the results of..." Sounds like you think you DO have a clue about the "nub"...settled science, right? :coffee:
Nope, didn't say settled either just "shown" and "results." You sure do like putting words in peoples mouths. I presented multiple different theories that are the results of scientific studies, some of which the authors attribute to changes in weather patterns, some attribute to changes in climate, some attribute to changes in the jet stream, some attribute to ozone. Sounds settled, right? :sarcasm: Any actual comments on the data above though or do you just feel like attacking the person who is delivering the message, Mr. Coffee ;)
Yes. What I see is a bunch of scientists who would rather attribute the unexplainability of whats happening on the antarctic ice shelf to ANYTHING but the fact that they could be wrong about AGW. But they pounce on ARCTIC ice melting as PROOF that they're right about AGW. Can't have it both ways.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
User avatar
travelinman67
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 9884
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:51 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State Vikings
A.K.A.: Modern Man
Location: Where the 1st Amendment still exists: CS.com

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by travelinman67 »

Good discussion on Dr. Murry's research re: CO2 equilibrium, and subsequent punitive anti-consensus targeting...

http://www.city-journal.org/2014/24_3_g ... rming.html
"That is how government works - we tell you what you can do today."
- EPA Kommissar Gina McCarthy
User avatar
andy7171
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 27951
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
I am a fan of: Wiping.
A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
Location: Eastern Palouse

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by andy7171 »

If the polar switch happens will we all eject. Or just stat speaking Australian? I got shrimp in the Barbie Jon!
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
User avatar
andy7171
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 27951
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
I am a fan of: Wiping.
A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
Location: Eastern Palouse

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by andy7171 »

Hon.
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 62363
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by kalm »

Large ice sheets are melting at an increasing rate...

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/5697998" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
travelinman67
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 9884
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:51 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State Vikings
A.K.A.: Modern Man
Location: Where the 1st Amendment still exists: CS.com

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by travelinman67 »

NCDC still hiding the truth...

...global cooling.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/08/23/c ... t-30-days/
"That is how government works - we tell you what you can do today."
- EPA Kommissar Gina McCarthy
User avatar
travelinman67
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 9884
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 9:51 pm
I am a fan of: Portland State Vikings
A.K.A.: Modern Man
Location: Where the 1st Amendment still exists: CS.com

Arctic Sea Ice Melting Myth

Post by travelinman67 »

Leeds University drops a bombshell...

...Arctic Sea Ice melting has reversed.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/08/30/t ... -reversed/
"That is how government works - we tell you what you can do today."
- EPA Kommissar Gina McCarthy
User avatar
AZGrizFan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 59959
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
Location: Just to the right of center

Re: Arctic Sea Ice Melting Myth

Post by AZGrizFan »

travelinman67 wrote:Leeds University drops a bombshell...

...Arctic Sea Ice melting has reversed.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/08/30/t ... -reversed/
These idiots remind me of the Hale Bop comet crowd and the end of the world.

2009: "The world will end in 2012!"
2013: "OK, I misread the data. The world will end in 2014!!"
2015: "I found a subtle difference I'd missed earlier...the world will now end in 2016!"

:lol:
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Image
kalm
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 62363
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern
A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
Location: Northern Palouse

Re: Arctic Sea Ice Melting Myth

Post by kalm »

travelinman67 wrote:Leeds University drops a bombshell...

...Arctic Sea Ice melting has reversed.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/08/30/t ... -reversed/
Sweet! Since this comparison goes back to 2006, can we use the conk 'not enough historical data' argument? :lol:

Interesting that one of the sources used by whatsupwiththat (I seriously love that name :lol:) , the NSIDC, contradicts your article.
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

Arctic sea ice extent is well below average, and large areas of low concentration ice are observed in the Beaufort Sea and along the Siberian coast. However, it is highly unlikely to set a record low at the end of this year’s melt season. Antarctic sea ice extent remains at record highs.
At least the Antarctic extent is still large…although that might be explained by ocean conditions and wind patterns.
Image
Image
Image
User avatar
CID1990
Level5
Level5
Posts: 25478
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:40 am
I am a fan of: Pie
A.K.A.: CID 1990
Location: กรุงเทพมหานคร

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by CID1990 »

kalm wrote:
travelinman67 wrote:Leeds University drops a bombshell...

...Arctic Sea Ice melting has reversed.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/08/30/t ... -reversed/
Sweet! Since this comparison goes back to 2006, can we use the conk 'not enough historical data' argument? :lol:

Interesting that one of the sources used by whatsupwiththat (I seriously love that name :lol:) , the NSIDC, contradicts your article.
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

Arctic sea ice extent is well below average, and large areas of low concentration ice are observed in the Beaufort Sea and along the Siberian coast. However, it is highly unlikely to set a record low at the end of this year’s melt season. Antarctic sea ice extent remains at record highs.
At least the Antarctic extent is still large…although that might be explained by ocean conditions and wind patterns.
what?

contradictory climate change articles? say it isnt so

you two are like winken and blinken
"You however, are an insufferable ankle biting mental chihuahua..." - Clizzoris
houndawg
Level5
Level5
Posts: 24485
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2008 1:14 pm
I am a fan of: SIU
A.K.A.: houndawg
Location: Egypt

Re: The nub of the climate change thing problem

Post by houndawg »

travelinman67 wrote:
JMU DJ wrote: ...You seem to be having the same issue as Z, you are only focusing on the Antarctic Records. Why aren't you talking about the records in the Arctic as well? Does sea ice increase in one part of the world give the big picture as to what is happening globally?...
Yet remarkably, the Alarmists ignore the Antarctic data when it doesn't suit their agenda. And since the Antarctic is approximately 11% larger, I'm sure you would agree the Antarctic climate activity has a larger effect on global climate patterns.
JMU DJ wrote: ...As much as I respect blogs for keeping scientist honest, I try not to get my scientific data/information from them....
And I avoid NOAA for climate data...they've repeatedly been caught posting false information, and their "Hansen" models have been nuked, yet they still treat them as gospel. :dunce:
JMU DJ wrote: ...As for the NSIDC data source that you are discrediting, are you bringing that up to discount the NOAA data I provided or was that in regards to the NOAA data that Z provided? ...
As three of your four graphs cited are based upon NSIDC "data", my critical remark was directed at your source.

This seems relevant to quote as well:

Attack the source.

Contribute nothing.

Demand more proof.

Waste their time.

Sound familiar?
Quite frankly, my statement is irrelevant to your post. It is, completely relevant to Kalm, BlueHen86, Houndawg, and (sometimes) Skjellyfetti, who reply to each conk post with inane blather. Unequivocally, consistently they;
Attack the source, Contribute nothing, Demand more proof, and waste everyone's time.

I do not categorize you with the aforementioned trolls, as you engage and debate. We may disagree, but I respect your opinion.
..or much of anything else....
You matter. Unless you multiply yourself by c squared. Then you energy.


"I really love America. I just don't know how to get there anymore."John Prine
Post Reply