We didn't say MARRY her, BF.TwinTownBisonFan wrote:in the minority of opinion here but there is too much ugly in that head to make for her body imoCleets Part 2 wrote:I'm pretty sure I'd f_ck her regardless of her shifting moral scale when applied to herself...
But before we become her apologist
or attack her sliding scale...
can't we just admire her in a moment of silence...
Dude..!!!AZGrizFan wrote:
You, sir, are not allowed to post again until we've seen the panties pic of your girlfriend.
she does not seem to care... in fact she seems to think it's "cute" how hot I think she is...
So in other words - "She ain't pretty she just looks that way"TwinTownBisonFan wrote:in the minority of opinion here but there is too much ugly in that head to make for her body imo
Checking if the blue turns to pink.Cleets Part 2 wrote:Dude..!!!AZGrizFan wrote:
You, sir, are not allowed to post again until we've seen the panties pic of your girlfriend.
I had the perfect shot last night after dinner...
she was coming out of the bathroom at my place
(she pee's like every 30 minutes... what's up with that..?)
and sporting a new pair of undies and I - in a rare moment of mutual respect did not grab my phone and take the picture...
but - the good news is we're close..!!!
Aarrgh..!!!!!Wedgebuster wrote:
Checking if the blue turns to pink.
Cleets Part 2 wrote:I'm pretty sure I'd f_ck her regardless of her shifting moral scale when applied to herself...
But before we become her apologist
or attack her sliding scale...
can't we just admire her in a moment of silence...
If you like the Auschwitz look..... Wedgebuster.....the cs.com buzzkill.Cleets Part 2 wrote:Aarrgh..!!!!!Wedgebuster wrote:
Checking if the blue turns to pink.
That's what I think as well and it's a little fucking sickening to see how she has been attacked for it. WTF is wrong with people. She was asked her opinion on an issue. She answered the question honestly. Did we all want her to take the easy PC route and lie so she could win? If that's the case then why don't all the gay people lie to those that don't believe as they do and make their lives easier? I don't get the absolute intolerance of a dissenting opinion and the absolute ravaging of her for what SHE THINKS. Is she wrong? In a lot of people's eyes she is, in a lot of other people's eyes she isn't, but she's taking a beating for giving her honest opinion on a question that she was asked. If you're too weak to hear a dissenting opinion then don't ask the GD question. I've yet to see someone's opinion changed when you just attack them. I've paid absolutely no attention to this shit because it's a stupid distraction over what one young gal holds as her own belief. Anybody in the gay community that tries to say they are tolerant is full of shit after the way they have gotten all up in arms over this.Cap'n Cat wrote:All bullsh*t aside, Cap'n Cat admires this young woman, Conk or not. Standing fast with her beliefs and facing the music. More power to her.
FUCKING BULLSHIT. FUCKING BULLSHITUrsus A. Horribilis wrote:That's what I think as well and it's a little fucking sickening to see how she has been attacked for it. WTF is wrong with people. She was asked her opinion on an issue. She answered the question honestly. Did we all want her to take the easy PC route and lie so she could win? If that's the case then why don't all the gay people lie to those that don't believe as they do and make their lives easier? I don't get the absolute intolerance of a dissenting opinion and the absolute ravaging of her for what SHE THINKS. Is she wrong? In a lot of people's eyes she is, in a lot of other people's eyes she isn't, but she's taking a beating for giving her honest opinion on a question that she was asked. If you're too weak to hear a dissenting opinion then don't ask the GD question. I've yet to see someone's opinion changed when you just attack them. I've paid absolutely no attention to this shit because it's a stupid distraction over what one young gal holds as her own belief. Anybody in the gay community that tries to say they are tolerant is full of shit after the way they have gotten all up in arms over this.Cap'n Cat wrote:All bullsh*t aside, Cap'n Cat admires this young woman, Conk or not. Standing fast with her beliefs and facing the music. More power to her.
dbackjon wrote:FUCKING BULLSHIT. FUCKING BULLSHITUrsus A. Horribilis wrote: That's what I think as well and it's a little fucking sickening to see how she has been attacked for it. WTF is wrong with people. She was asked her opinion on an issue. She answered the question honestly. Did we all want her to take the easy PC route and lie so she could win? If that's the case then why don't all the gay people lie to those that don't believe as they do and make their lives easier? I don't get the absolute intolerance of a dissenting opinion and the absolute ravaging of her for what SHE THINKS. Is she wrong? In a lot of people's eyes she is, in a lot of other people's eyes she isn't, but she's taking a beating for giving her honest opinion on a question that she was asked. If you're too weak to hear a dissenting opinion then don't ask the GD question. I've yet to see someone's opinion changed when you just attack them. I've paid absolutely no attention to this shit because it's a stupid distraction over what one young gal holds as her own belief. Anybody in the gay community that tries to say they are tolerant is full of shit after the way they have gotten all up in arms over this.
You don't know a goddamn thing about hatred, or inequality. So you, T-man, etc STOP FUCKING TALKING ABOUT GAY INTOLERANCE
Oh, poor Miss California - so devasted that she immediately signed up to do a national ANIT_GAY ad campaign with a FUCKING HATE GROUP
I will stop being intolerant towards ASSHOLES THAT THINK I AM LESS THAN HUMAN when I get full respect and equality.
ANYONE THAT DOES NOT BELIEVE IN FULL EQUALITY FOR ALL AMERICANS are fucking dirtbag assholes that deserve every bit of shit they get.
Miss California can do whatever the hell she pleases. No one is making HER a second class citizen. She can marry whatever stupid fucking guy she wants. She can go to her church and praise Jesus and think I am going to hell - that is her right. BUT WHEN SHE OPENS HER SKANK MOUTH, and TELLS ME I AM NOT DESERVING OF EQUALITY - she can go STRAIGHT TO HELL, and take with her anyone that feels sorry for her.
So fuck you for judging me and the rest of the GLBT community that are fighting for things you take for fucking granted.
Don't agree. Yeah, in the bar or during convo at the church rummage sale, sure they should not be attacked. This woman is in the national spotlight and her beliefs now become dangerous. Fuck her, I hope she gets shot in the head by a crip.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Like I said dback she don't believe what you believe and you don't believe what she believes and neither side is gonna make any headway on it because all that happens is attacks. If she was in an anti gay ad campaign I didn't know about it but acting like people aren't entitled to their opinions when they are asked about them is intolerant. I didn't say a mother fucking thing about the struggle the gay community is working on to achieve equality. What I said was it's ludicrous to attack someone when they are flat out asked for their opinion on something.
There wasn't attacking going on until she started playing the persecuted Christian/Evil Gay card. 90% of the gays I know could care less about the Miss USA Pageant. And most, while not agreeing with her sentiments, did not "ATTACK" her for it. Most would have thought, like I did "stupid cvnt" and left it at that.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Like I said dback she don't believe what you believe and you don't believe what she believes and neither side is gonna make any headway on it because all that happens is attacks. If she was in an anti gay ad campaign I didn't know about it but acting like people aren't entitled to their opinions when they are asked about them is intolerant. I didn't say a mother fucking thing about the struggle the gay community is working on to achieve equality. What I said was it's ludicrous to attack someone when they are flat out asked for their opinion on something.
If we don't want people to answer questions honestly then the questions shouldn't be asked. And I don't care a whole lot about what she thinks because it ain't gonna make a fucking bit of difference to what I believe. If you want tolerance then I guess shooting people that don't believe like you do would be a good start if we're shooting people for their opinions now. The only other option I guess would be to try to change the more narrow minded folks minds by showing them that what they fear has no basis in reality. If they don't change their mind then so what? Society will be moving on without them anyway.D1B wrote:Don't agree. Yeah, in the bar or during convo at the church rummage sale, sure they should not be attacked. This woman is in the national spotlight and her beliefs now become dangerous. Fuck her, I hope she gets shot in the head by a crip.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Like I said dback she don't believe what you believe and you don't believe what she believes and neither side is gonna make any headway on it because all that happens is attacks. If she was in an anti gay ad campaign I didn't know about it but acting like people aren't entitled to their opinions when they are asked about them is intolerant. I didn't say a mother fucking thing about the struggle the gay community is working on to achieve equality. What I said was it's ludicrous to attack someone when they are flat out asked for their opinion on something.
I have heard no queens speak of this Jon. As I said I haven't followed it except for what I've heard on a few news clips the day after it happened and maybe twice since then from news outlets. So I'm not casting any dispersions on the gay community due to whatever they said. If I had a question about what the gay community's temperature was on something I would ask someone in that world that I knew and trusted for their real opinion on the issue at hand. YEAH FUCKER, I WOULD ASK YOU.dbackjon wrote:There wasn't attacking going on until she started playing the persecuted Christian/Evil Gay card. 90% of the gays I know could care less about the Miss USA Pageant. And most, while not agreeing with her sentiments, did not "ATTACK" her for it. Most would have thought, like I did "stupid cvnt" and left it at that.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:Like I said dback she don't believe what you believe and you don't believe what she believes and neither side is gonna make any headway on it because all that happens is attacks. If she was in an anti gay ad campaign I didn't know about it but acting like people aren't entitled to their opinions when they are asked about them is intolerant. I didn't say a mother fucking thing about the struggle the gay community is working on to achieve equality. What I said was it's ludicrous to attack someone when they are flat out asked for their opinion on something.
And don't confuse what a few radical queens say for the entire gay community. That would be like me blaming YOU for something an Aryan Nation asshole said, and condemning all whites for it.
D-back...dbackjon wrote:So I posted the story - said I thought it was funny she was Miss Moral High and Mighty.
T-man ATTACKED ME, by ASSUMING that those that released the picture were only doing it for that "typical extremist gay hate"
A few pointless banters between myself and T-man, then he blasted this: It's pathetic, however, that there are so many GLBT's in America who are incapable of showing as much tolerance, understanding and integrity as Miss. Prejean.
Followed by pictures of the women
I didn't reply to T-man's slurs.
But you replied to Cap'n, with a T-manesque shotgun blast about how intolerant and up in arms we are...
Cleets Part 2 wrote:D-back...dbackjon wrote:So I posted the story - said I thought it was funny she was Miss Moral High and Mighty.
T-man ATTACKED ME, by ASSUMING that those that released the picture were only doing it for that "typical extremist gay hate"
A few pointless banters between myself and T-man, then he blasted this: It's pathetic, however, that there are so many GLBT's in America who are incapable of showing as much tolerance, understanding and integrity as Miss. Prejean.
Followed by pictures of the women
I didn't reply to T-man's slurs.
But you replied to Cap'n, with a T-manesque shotgun blast about how intolerant and up in arms we are...
If I'm understanding this correctly, you're letting T-man's absurd incongruous blathering get under your skin
You are a better man than I. Fuck em, shoot em all I don't have time to rehabilitate shitheads.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote:If we don't want people to answer questions honestly then the questions shouldn't be asked. And I don't care a whole lot about what she thinks because it ain't gonna make a fucking bit of difference to what I believe. If you want tolerance then I guess shooting people that don't believe like you do would be a good start if we're shooting people for their opinions now. The only other option I guess would be to try to change the more narrow minded folks minds by showing them that what they fear has no basis in reality. If they don't change their mind then so what? Society will be moving on without them anyway.D1B wrote:
Don't agree. Yeah, in the bar or during convo at the church rummage sale, sure they should not be attacked. This woman is in the national spotlight and her beliefs now become dangerous. Fuck her, I hope she gets shot in the head by a crip.
I referenced the gay community in the last line because they put the smear out on her with the nude pics that are apparently from a modeling shoot that is a part of her job or career choice. Does it show inconsistency with what she says her belief are? I don't see it but it wouldn't be the first time I've been wrong either.dbackjon wrote:So I posted the story - said I thought it was funny she was Miss Moral High and Mighty.
T-man ATTACKED ME, by ASSUMING that those that released the picture were only doing it for that "typical extremist gay hate"
A few pointless banters between myself and T-man, then he blasted this: It's pathetic, however, that there are so many GLBT's in America who are incapable of showing as much tolerance, understanding and integrity as Miss. Prejean.
Followed by pictures of the women
I didn't reply to T-man's slurs.
But you replied to Cap'n, with a T-manesque shotgun blast about how intolerant and up in arms we are...
You make a powerful argument so I'll go ahead and sign off on it then.D1B wrote:You are a better man than I. Fuck em, shoot em all I don't have time to rehabilitate shitheads.Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: If we don't want people to answer questions honestly then the questions shouldn't be asked. And I don't care a whole lot about what she thinks because it ain't gonna make a fucking bit of difference to what I believe. If you want tolerance then I guess shooting people that don't believe like you do would be a good start if we're shooting people for their opinions now. The only other option I guess would be to try to change the more narrow minded folks minds by showing them that what they fear has no basis in reality. If they don't change their mind then so what? Society will be moving on without them anyway.
Besides I just went and picked up a great pizza so I don't have time for rehab myself right now. Ursus,Ursus A. Horribilis wrote: To be honest I didn't fully read Tman's post but skimmed it
