That's about as racist and sexist as it gets. "See it MY way or you have no brains."
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
As I said Tardo, unlike the Donks, the Conks don't put their wackos in leadership positions.houndawg wrote:As opposed to the conks, who send their best and brightest.Baldy wrote: The difference is the Donks actually elect their Sarah Palins and make them Speaker of the House, or Hillary's main competition for 2016.
You're a moron. Sarah offers nothing to this country. She hasn't worked in Gov't since 2008. She's a farce.SuperHornet wrote:Trip's an idiot. Sarah's the best candidate in the GOP right now. The Donkey's are scared of her. And so they respond with their patented slander.
Go Sarah!
It has nothing to do with her being a female. It has everything to do with her lack of experience. She isn't a politician. She's a talking head.SuperHornet wrote:Typical Donk politics...silence the minorities and women on the Conservative side by labeling them "wackos," and then proceed to "prove" that the Right doesn't support minorities and women, and moreover are conducting a "war" against them...all because those minorities and women don't toe the Donk line.
That's about as racist and sexist as it gets. "See it MY way or you have no brains."
Baldy wrote:As I said Tardo, unlike the Donks, the Conks don't put their wackos in leadership positions.houndawg wrote:
As opposed to the conks, who send their best and brightest.
Boehner and McConnell are as milquetoast as one can get.
SuperHornet wrote:Typical Donk politics...silence the minorities and women on the Conservative side by labeling them "wackos," and then proceed to "prove" that the Right doesn't support minorities and women, and moreover are conducting a "war" against them...all because those minorities and women don't toe the Donk line.
That's about as racist and sexist as it gets. "See it MY way or you have no brains."
dbackjon wrote:SuperHornet wrote:Typical Donk politics...silence the minorities and women on the Conservative side by labeling them "wackos," and then proceed to "prove" that the Right doesn't support minorities and women, and moreover are conducting a "war" against them...all because those minorities and women don't toe the Donk line.
That's about as racist and sexist as it gets. "See it MY way or you have no brains."
LMAO - it has nothing to do with her being a femaie. We've had plenty of good females in the GOP - I may not agree with them all the time politically, but they were solid people.
It is very sexist of you to assume that people attack Palin just because she is female.
Just like it is very sexist of you to support her JUST because she is a female.
GrizFanStuckInUtah wrote:dbackjon wrote:
LMAO - it has nothing to do with her being a femaie. We've had plenty of good females in the GOP - I may not agree with them all the time politically, but they were solid people.
It is very sexist of you to assume that people attack Palin just because she is female.
Just like it is very sexist of you to support her JUST because she is a female.
Meet Utah's newest female rep in the house, republican at that. I wasn't able to vote for her as she is from a different district than I am but I would have if she was.
Yeah, many of them are also milquetoast and bipartisan, but getting rid of far left radicals like Boxer, Feinstein, Murray, etc. will be good for the country.dbackjon wrote:Baldy wrote: As I said Tardo, unlike the Donks, the Conks don't put their wackos in leadership positions.
Boehner and McConnell are as milquetoast as one can get.
LMAO - have you seen the new Senate committee chairs?
Don't give a shit about Palin, but Kim Jong Un is 100X the American Nancy Pelosi will ever be...And Pelosi is 100 x the American Palin ever could dream to be.
Baldy: August, 2008:Baldy wrote:Kinda like how the DOJ investigation was gonna nail those racist cops in Ferguson, right uncle houndawg?houndawg wrote:
Hillary will show the strong pimp hand to these catamites.![]()
Your track record of predictions is rather comical. You might need to stick to predicting if your bladder can hold itself through breakfast.
You and your brother are slippin', my friend.Cap'n Cat wrote:Baldy: August, 2008:Baldy wrote: Kinda like how the DOJ investigation was gonna nail those racist cops in Ferguson, right uncle houndawg?![]()
Your track record of predictions is rather comical. You might need to stick to predicting if your bladder can hold itself through breakfast.
"John McCain could not have selected a better running mate than Sarah Palin."
How'd dat work out for ya, Li'l Rush?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Cap'n Cat wrote:Baldy: August, 2008:Baldy wrote: Kinda like how the DOJ investigation was gonna nail those racist cops in Ferguson, right uncle houndawg?![]()
Your track record of predictions is rather comical. You might need to stick to predicting if your bladder can hold itself through breakfast.
"John McCain could not have selected a better running mate than Sarah Palin."
How'd dat work out for ya, Li'l Rush?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Talking head? Palin has more practical executive experience than Obama had before he was elected.Ibanez wrote:It has nothing to do with her being a female. It has everything to do with her lack of experience. She isn't a politician. She's a talking head.SuperHornet wrote:Typical Donk politics...silence the minorities and women on the Conservative side by labeling them "wackos," and then proceed to "prove" that the Right doesn't support minorities and women, and moreover are conducting a "war" against them...all because those minorities and women don't toe the Donk line.
That's about as racist and sexist as it gets. "See it MY way or you have no brains."
The Illinois district Obama represented almost equals Alaska's population.SuperHornet wrote:Talking head? Palin has more practical executive experience than Obama had before he was elected.Ibanez wrote:
It has nothing to do with her being a female. It has everything to do with her lack of experience. She isn't a politician. She's a talking head.
Sexist.VictorG wrote:I would LOVE to see Sarah team up with Michele Bachmann on the same ticket! Holly COW, Saturday Night Live seven days a week!![]()
Sarah Palin on 2016: 'Of Course' She's Interested!
http://news.yahoo.com/sarah-palin-2016- ... 15678.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
∞∞∞ wrote:The Illinois district Obama represented almost equals Alaska's population.SuperHornet wrote:
Talking head? Palin has more practical executive experience than Obama had before he was elected.
No doubt, but this isn't 2008 and you need more than executive experience. She's done nothing since 2008. She's a distraction.SuperHornet wrote:Talking head? Palin has more practical executive experience than Obama had before he was elected.Ibanez wrote:
It has nothing to do with her being a female. It has everything to do with her lack of experience. She isn't a politician. She's a talking head.
Still waiting for that link, houndawg jr.Baldy wrote:Cap'n Cat wrote:
Baldy: August, 2008:
"John McCain could not have selected a better running mate than Sarah Palin."
How'd dat work out for ya, Li'l Rush?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Link?
Baldy wrote:Still waiting for that link, houndawg jr.Baldy wrote:
![]()
Link?
Cap'n Cat wrote:Baldy wrote:
Still waiting for that link, houndawg jr.
That little nip slip is gonna hound you forever, Li'l Tbag!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
SH, did you see any of clips of her speaking in Iowa last week?SuperHornet wrote:There are PLENTY of Donks who attack Palin simply because she's female...or more specifically, because she's female in the WRONG party.
That said, you're one of the Liberals who has a decent head on his shoulders, Jon. You actually THINK about what you're going to say. That can't be said for many Liberals in this country, who merely spout off MSNBC/DNC talking points and drop F-bombs on anyone who disagrees. Thank you for being different.