I'd take Brady, Rogers, and Brees over him. Maybe Luck.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:In the last 2 games Wilson is 26-50 with 3 TDs and 5 Ints
He has been sacked 8 times (holds the ball too long)
Not "elite" QB numbers and he should be 0-2 this post season.
He is an average QB who doesnt make players around him better, sure his receivers are horrible but Brady doesnt use that as an excuse. Nobody has done more with less talent than Brady
Super Bowl thread
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 68918
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Super Bowl thread
-
tribe_pride
- Level2

- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:53 am
- I am a fan of: W&M
Re: Super Bowl thread
Why does it matter? Because I am curious who called the play and no other reason.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Why does it matter?tribe_pride wrote:Out of curiosity, is it Bevell or Carroll who calls the offensive plays for Seattle? I really don't know.
It is easy to call a play, but it is hard to EXECUTE the play call.
I always laugh when people blame play calling, they should be blaming players like Wilson for that perfect pass, low and in front of the WR just like he is coached to throw it and the WR who was in position to make that catch if not for a brilliant play from a young Pats DB.
That play was 100% perfectly played on both sides of the ball..................but sometimes players just make a play. Like that BS catch by Kearse a couple plays earlier.
I see people here and other places blaming Bevell for the call but Carroll took responsibility for the pass. I just wanted to know who called the play for no other reason than I am curious. Do you know?
- ALPHAGRIZ1
- Level5

- Posts: 16077
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
- I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
- A.K.A.: Fuck Off
- Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis
Re: Super Bowl thread
Nope, but the play call wasnt the problem it was the players execution.

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black
The flat earth society has members all around the globe
- GannonFan
- Level5

- Posts: 19231
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
- I am a fan of: Delaware
- A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack
Re: Super Bowl thread
And again, the execution wouldn't have mattered if they just let Lynch execute his beastmode into the endzone so they could start the party.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Nope, but the play call wasnt the problem it was the players execution.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
- ALPHAGRIZ1
- Level5

- Posts: 16077
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
- I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
- A.K.A.: Fuck Off
- Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis
Re: Super Bowl thread
Bradykalm wrote:I'd take Brady, Rogers, and Brees over him. Maybe Luck.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:In the last 2 games Wilson is 26-50 with 3 TDs and 5 Ints
He has been sacked 8 times (holds the ball too long)
Not "elite" QB numbers and he should be 0-2 this post season.
He is an average QB who doesnt make players around him better, sure his receivers are horrible but Brady doesnt use that as an excuse. Nobody has done more with less talent than Brady
Rodgers
Luck
Brees
Flacco
Stafford
Roethlisberger
Eli Manning
Rivers

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black
The flat earth society has members all around the globe
-
tribe_pride
- Level2

- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:53 am
- I am a fan of: W&M
Re: Super Bowl thread
What do you not get that I could care less about that part of the play. I disagree with the play call but I really could care less about the specific call or the result for my question. I have heard different answers and was trying to clarify something. Everything after "Nope" was completely irrelevant for me.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Nope, but the play call wasnt the problem it was the players execution.
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 68918
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Super Bowl thread
Maybe FlaccoALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Bradykalm wrote:
I'd take Brady, Rogers, and Brees over him. Maybe Luck.
Rodgers
Luck
Brees
Flacco
Stafford
Roethlisberger
Eli Manning
Rivers
- ALPHAGRIZ1
- Level5

- Posts: 16077
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
- I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
- A.K.A.: Fuck Off
- Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis
Re: Super Bowl thread
Why do you want to focus on the thing that matters least?
Does it matter if the OC or HC called the play? Nope
Does it matter if the OC or HC called the play? Nope

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black
The flat earth society has members all around the globe
Re: Super Bowl thread
Which means that you do care.tribe_pride wrote:What do you not get that I could care less about that part of the play. I disagree with the play call but I really could care less about the specific call or the result for my question. I have heard different answers and was trying to clarify something. Everything after "Nope" was completely irrelevant for me.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Nope, but the play call wasnt the problem it was the players execution.
- ALPHAGRIZ1
- Level5

- Posts: 16077
- Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 8:26 am
- I am a fan of: 1995 Montana Griz
- A.K.A.: Fuck Off
- Location: America: and having my rights violated on a daily basis
Re: Super Bowl thread
See, even bandl gets itbandl wrote:Which means that you do care.tribe_pride wrote:
What do you not get that I could care less about that part of the play. I disagree with the play call but I really could care less about the specific call or the result for my question. I have heard different answers and was trying to clarify something. Everything after "Nope" was completely irrelevant for me.

ALPHAGRIZ1 - Now available in internet black
The flat earth society has members all around the globe
Re: Super Bowl thread
THIRST!ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:See, even bandl gets itbandl wrote: Which means that you do care.
er,I mean, ANDY ANCHOR!
(did I get that right? I don't see this Andy's anchors thing sticking)
- Grizalltheway
- Supporter

- Posts: 35688
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 10:01 pm
- A.K.A.: DJ Honey BBQ
- Location: BSC
Re: Super Bowl thread
It'll stick like jizz to the the roof of alphie's mouth.
Re: Super Bowl thread
OR PEANUT BUTTER TO THE ROOF OF YOUR DOG'S MOUTH?!?! CUZ IT'S YOUR DOG?!?!Grizalltheway wrote:It'll stick like jizz to the the roof of alphie's mouth.
-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: Super Bowl thread
And this is where proximity of fanbases comes into play. I am in giants/jets territory and there are a lot of Pat/Cowboy bandwagoners here. But I've also lived in PA, so I know how steelers fans can be (which are the worst imo). Yeah, I'd place steelers fans as the worst fanbase in the NFL and it's not close.Vidav wrote:None of them come close.Seahawks08 wrote:
Pats, Steelers, Cowboys, Giants, 49ers, and Raiders' fans would like to have a word with you...
Darrell Bevell (seahawks OC) should be left in Arizona to become the newest person to apply for unemployment benefits. I can't believe that douche actually called that **** play. The 5th best rushing offense of all time and you don't run the ball in from the 1 on second down? GTFO now!![]()
Other than that, one hell of a game!
Bevell calls the plays and Pete sometimes confirms them (pass/run only, not specific plays). From what I've read and heard, it seems like that was the case with this one. So while Pete gets some of the blame, I still mostly blame Bevell for that stupid call.tribe_pride wrote:What do you not get that I could care less about that part of the play. I disagree with the play call but I really could care less about the specific call or the result for my question. I have heard different answers and was trying to clarify something. Everything after "Nope" was completely irrelevant for me.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Nope, but the play call wasnt the problem it was the players execution.

-
Seahawks08
- Level2

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 9:28 pm
- I am a fan of: Villanova
Re: Super Bowl thread
Are we talking about a decent pass pro oline? Because if so, then you can make a case for each of them. If not, then I'd only take Rodgers and Luck as the others would be on IR by week 4.ALPHAGRIZ1 wrote:Bradykalm wrote:
I'd take Brady, Rogers, and Brees over him. Maybe Luck.
Rodgers
Luck
Brees
Flacco
Stafford
Roethlisberger
Eli Manning
Rivers
Alas, let's come to the dumbest thing you posted...Wilson doesn't make others around him better. You ever hear of Chris Matthews before Sunday? Wilson has won with no true #1 WR in all 3 years he's been in the NFL. Sidney Rice and Tate were solid #2s and this year he didn't even have that. Wilson is an above average QB with the potential to become elite and he's well on his way there.

-
tribe_pride
- Level2

- Posts: 1626
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 8:53 am
- I am a fan of: W&M
Re: Super Bowl thread
Thanks.Seahawks08 wrote:And this is where proximity of fanbases comes into play. I am in giants/jets territory and there are a lot of Pat/Cowboy bandwagoners here. But I've also lived in PA, so I know how steelers fans can be (which are the worst imo). Yeah, I'd place steelers fans as the worst fanbase in the NFL and it's not close.Vidav wrote:
None of them come close.![]()
Bevell calls the plays and Pete sometimes confirms them (pass/run only, not specific plays). From what I've read and heard, it seems like that was the case with this one. So while Pete gets some of the blame, I still mostly blame Bevell for that stupid call.tribe_pride wrote:
What do you not get that I could care less about that part of the play. I disagree with the play call but I really could care less about the specific call or the result for my question. I have heard different answers and was trying to clarify something. Everything after "Nope" was completely irrelevant for me.
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: Super Bowl thread
Not sure if this has been stated yet:
The Seahawks had one timeout and didn't want to use it - as they wanted to be able to use their entire alotment of downs in case they needed them...
The Seahawks were waiting for the Patriots to call a timeout - literally the coaching staff of the seahawks was anticipating the time out by New England
When it didn't come they knew they needed to run a pass play to stop the clock
The End:
"Never interrupt your enemy when he's preparing to make a tactical mistake"
The Patriots in so doing - by not calling a timeout - forced the Seahwaks who were mostly standing around waiting for the Time out call by New England to then hurry in a pass play call
I have NFL Rewind and watched it a few times... I stand by my assessment
The Seahawks had one timeout and didn't want to use it - as they wanted to be able to use their entire alotment of downs in case they needed them...
The Seahawks were waiting for the Patriots to call a timeout - literally the coaching staff of the seahawks was anticipating the time out by New England
When it didn't come they knew they needed to run a pass play to stop the clock
The End:
"Never interrupt your enemy when he's preparing to make a tactical mistake"
The Patriots in so doing - by not calling a timeout - forced the Seahwaks who were mostly standing around waiting for the Time out call by New England to then hurry in a pass play call
I have NFL Rewind and watched it a few times... I stand by my assessment
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
- JohnStOnge
- Egalitarian

- Posts: 20316
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:47 pm
- I am a fan of: McNeese State
- A.K.A.: JohnStOnge
Re: Super Bowl thread
On the quarterback ranking thing:
I never have understood the thing where people rate quarterbacks on the basis of how well their TEAM did. It's a team game.
For extreme example: Trent Dilfer's Baltimore Ravens team won a Super Bowl in 2000. Dan Marino never quarterbacked a Super Bowl champ. Is ANYBODY going to say Trent Dilfer was a better quarterback than Dan Marino?
Or even somebody like Terry Bradshaw on those great Steelers teams. Does ANYBODY here think, for example, that Dan Marino wouldn't have done at LEAST as well playing on teams like that? Or how about Dan Fouts? I mean come on.
This thing of "how many championships did 'they' win" is way overrated when it comes to ranking quarterbacks.
I never have understood the thing where people rate quarterbacks on the basis of how well their TEAM did. It's a team game.
For extreme example: Trent Dilfer's Baltimore Ravens team won a Super Bowl in 2000. Dan Marino never quarterbacked a Super Bowl champ. Is ANYBODY going to say Trent Dilfer was a better quarterback than Dan Marino?
Or even somebody like Terry Bradshaw on those great Steelers teams. Does ANYBODY here think, for example, that Dan Marino wouldn't have done at LEAST as well playing on teams like that? Or how about Dan Fouts? I mean come on.
This thing of "how many championships did 'they' win" is way overrated when it comes to ranking quarterbacks.
Well, I believe that I must tell the truth
And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?
Deep Purple: No One Came

And say things as they really are
But if I told the truth and nothing but the truth
Could I ever be a star?
Deep Purple: No One Came

-
Vidav
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 10804
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: The Russian
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: Super Bowl thread
Lynch is not the best RB in the NFL.Chizzang wrote:
-
kalm
- Supporter

- Posts: 68918
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Super Bowl thread
Who would you rather have?Vidav wrote:Lynch is not the best RB in the NFL.Chizzang wrote:
-
Vidav
- Moderator Team

- Posts: 10804
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: The Russian
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: Super Bowl thread
McCoy, Bell, Murray. . . Peterson if he weren't suspended.kalm wrote:Who would you rather have?Vidav wrote:
Lynch is not the best RB in the NFL.
- Chizzang
- Level5

- Posts: 19274
- Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 7:36 am
- I am a fan of: Deflate Gate
- A.K.A.: The Quasar Kid
- Location: Palermo Italy
Re: Super Bowl thread
For the most part I agree...JohnStOnge wrote:On the quarterback ranking thing:
I never have understood the thing where people rate quarterbacks on the basis of how well their TEAM did. It's a team game.
For extreme example: Trent Dilfer's Baltimore Ravens team won a Super Bowl in 2000. Dan Marino never quarterbacked a Super Bowl champ. Is ANYBODY going to say Trent Dilfer was a better quarterback than Dan Marino?
Or even somebody like Terry Bradshaw on those great Steelers teams. Does ANYBODY here think, for example, that Dan Marino wouldn't have done at LEAST as well playing on teams like that? Or how about Dan Fouts? I mean come on.
This thing of "how many championships did 'they' win" is way overrated when it comes to ranking quarterbacks.
I think part of what keeps the chatter along these lines going is Peyton Manning
He's a very good (maybe even the best ever) regular season QB
But he is absolutely below average in the playoffs
This is the thing that either builds or dismantles the QB all time rating thing
The statistics show the Peyton thing to be a NO DOUBT about it... he comes up small in big games
Q: Name something that offends Republicans?
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
A: The actual teachings of Jesus
Re: Super Bowl thread
Kind of like Wilson is proving to do.Chizzang wrote:For the most part I agree...JohnStOnge wrote:On the quarterback ranking thing:
I never have understood the thing where people rate quarterbacks on the basis of how well their TEAM did. It's a team game.
For extreme example: Trent Dilfer's Baltimore Ravens team won a Super Bowl in 2000. Dan Marino never quarterbacked a Super Bowl champ. Is ANYBODY going to say Trent Dilfer was a better quarterback than Dan Marino?
Or even somebody like Terry Bradshaw on those great Steelers teams. Does ANYBODY here think, for example, that Dan Marino wouldn't have done at LEAST as well playing on teams like that? Or how about Dan Fouts? I mean come on.
This thing of "how many championships did 'they' win" is way overrated when it comes to ranking quarterbacks.
I think part of what keeps the chatter along these lines going is Peyton Manning
He's a very good (maybe even the best ever) regular season QB
But he is absolutely below average in the playoffs
This is the thing that either builds or dismantles the QB all time rating thing
The statistics show the Peyton thing to be a NO DOUBT about it... he comes up small in big games
He'll soon be the most over laid QB in the league...
-
YoUDeeMan
- Level5

- Posts: 12088
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
- I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
- A.K.A.: Delaware Homie
Re: Super Bowl thread
Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa????Chizzang wrote:Not sure if this has been stated yet:
The Seahawks had one timeout and didn't want to use it - as they wanted to be able to use their entire alotment of downs in case they needed them...
The Seahawks were waiting for the Patriots to call a timeout - literally the coaching staff of the seahawks was anticipating the time out by New England
When it didn't come they knew they needed to run a pass play to stop the clock
The End:
"Never interrupt your enemy when he's preparing to make a tactical mistake"
The Patriots in so doing - by not calling a timeout - forced the Seahwaks who were mostly standing around waiting for the Time out call by New England to then hurry in a pass play call
I have NFL Rewind and watched it a few times... I stand by my assessment
Why would they hurry in a pass play that would stop the clock when they wanted to run the clock down so that the Pats would have less time left? They could have just as easily hurried in a QB sneak.
Your guess doesn't make any sense.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?
What if I have more personalities than that?
What if I have more personalities than that?




