Ibanez wrote:Bibi should go lone wolf. Defend your country and to hell with what the USA says.travelinman67 wrote:White House escalates...fires more shots at Netanyahu...
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/01/29/us ... ?referrer=
So what? We've sold to countries that use them on civilians before, right here in our own backyard.CID1990 wrote:Actually, we blocked heavy arms sales to Nigeria because of thei concern that they might eventually be used on innocent civilians. The Nigerian security forces have a history of that.andy7171 wrote: #saveourgirls
I saw we, the US, blocked a deal involving Israel selling old Cobra helicopters to Nigeria because Nigeria isn't doing enough to fight Boko Haram. I'm sure those helicopters wouldn't have helped.
Agreed. Foreign Aide is a huge waste in many cases.houndawg wrote:Ibanez wrote:
Bibi should go lone wolf. Defend your country and to hell with what the USA says.
Israel should go its own way financially too. We don't need them; they need us. Its long past time that they were brought to understand that.
Ibanez wrote:Agreed. Foreign Aide is a huge waste in many cases.houndawg wrote:
Israel should go its own way financially too. We don't need them; they need us. Its long past time that they were brought to understand that.
"I'll take that bet!"houndawg wrote:Ibanez wrote: Agreed. Foreign Aide is a huge waste in many cases.
I'll bet Bibi wishes he hadn't been so quick to align himself with a loser like Boehner. Obama is going to make Israel squeal like a pig.
Go to bed, you fat bum.travelinman67 wrote:Transcript of Netanyahu's speech to the joint congressional session, Tuesday March 3, 2015:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03 ... -congress/
And this was an "insult" how?
By reminding the world that a nuclear Iran represents a genuine threat to the existence of the State and people of Israel as well as further destabilizing the middle east and threatening the safety of every country on the planet?
By challenging President Obama's "Iran is misunderstood" narrative?
By suggesting the United States' anti-proliferation efforts have failed?
By speaking the truth?
By having zero to offer as an alternative except more of the same: war. If we're going to use Israel to do our killing for us we should sic em on Saudi Arabia, oh wait...... Israel and the House of Saud are pals... nevermind....travelinman67 wrote:Transcript of Netanyahu's speech to the joint congressional session, Tuesday March 3, 2015:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03 ... -congress/
And this was an "insult" how?
By reminding the world that a nuclear Iran represents a genuine threat to the existence of the State and people of Israel as well as further destabilizing the middle east and threatening the safety of every country on the planet?
By challenging President Obama's "Iran is misunderstood" narrative?
By suggesting the United States' anti-proliferation efforts have failed?
By speaking the truth?
He won't come here. Too many pigs!kalm wrote:WTF was the point of that speech?
I predict that Bibi takes Iowa!
HI54UNI wrote:He won't come here. Too many pigs!kalm wrote:WTF was the point of that speech?
I predict that Bibi takes Iowa!
...and why did the democrats and obama vilify it? Pelosi was in tears?HI54UNI wrote:He won't come here. Too many pigs!kalm wrote:WTF was the point of that speech?
I predict that Bibi takes Iowa!
What alternatives are you suggesting?houndawg wrote:By having zero to offer as an alternative except more of the same: war. If we're going to use Israel to do our killing for us we should sic em on Saudi Arabia, oh wait...... Israel and the House of Saud are pals... nevermind....travelinman67 wrote:Transcript of Netanyahu's speech to the joint congressional session, Tuesday March 3, 2015:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2015/03 ... -congress/
And this was an "insult" how?
By reminding the world that a nuclear Iran represents a genuine threat to the existence of the State and people of Israel as well as further destabilizing the middle east and threatening the safety of every country on the planet?
By challenging President Obama's "Iran is misunderstood" narrative?
By suggesting the United States' anti-proliferation efforts have failed?
By speaking the truth?
It's the same mentality that giving terrorists jobs will stop terrorism.travelinman67 wrote:What alternatives are you suggesting?houndawg wrote:
By having zero to offer as an alternative except more of the same: war. If we're going to use Israel to do our killing for us we should sic em on Saudi Arabia, oh wait...... Israel and the House of Saud are pals... nevermind....
Why is Obama so dead set on ending sanctions and removing military options?
What? No "alternatives" to offer?travelinman67 wrote:What alternatives are you suggesting?houndawg wrote:
By having zero to offer as an alternative except more of the same: war. If we're going to use Israel to do our killing for us we should sic em on Saudi Arabia, oh wait...... Israel and the House of Saud are pals... nevermind....
Why is Obama so dead set on ending sanctions and removing military options?
Densedawg already crossed that bridge on here a long time ago....travelinman67 wrote:What? No "alternatives" to offer?travelinman67 wrote:
What alternatives are you suggesting?
Why is Obama so dead set on ending sanctions and removing military options?
That's right, better to remain silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove any doubts.
After I spent all that time explaining to you the concept of "average", helping you through another tough spot in life, you treat me like this?BDKJMU wrote:Densedawg already crossed that bridge on here a long time ago....travelinman67 wrote:
What? No "alternatives" to offer?
That's right, better to remain silent and thought a fool than to speak and remove any doubts.
Days after Senate initiates probe into State Department funding Israel anti-Netanyahu group "V15"...travelinman67 wrote:Why is our State Department channeling funds to the leftist Anti-Netanyahu organization "V15"?
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/201 ... -election/
http://freebeacon.com/national-security ... -campaign/
travelinman67 wrote:What alternatives are you suggesting?houndawg wrote:
By having zero to offer as an alternative except more of the same: war. If we're going to use Israel to do our killing for us we should sic em on Saudi Arabia, oh wait...... Israel and the House of Saud are pals... nevermind....
Why is Obama so dead set on ending sanctions and removing military options?
State's rights issues..travelinman67 wrote:You forgot, "White House managed public education, and involuntary sterilization."
WHITE HOUSE: BIBI'S ELECTION UNDERMINES 'DEMOCRATIC IDEALS'
8:05 PM, MAR 18, 2015 •
BY DANIEL HALPER
In a comment unprompted by any question from the media, White House press secretary lashed into some of the rhetoric Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu used in his reelection campaign. The White House even suggested it had hurt Israel's democracy and America's relationship with its greatest ally in the Middle East."
There’s one other thing that I anticipated might come up that I just did want to mention as it relates to the Israeli elections. Specifically, there has been a lot of coverage in the media about some of the rhetoric that emerged yesterday that was propagated by the Likud Party to encourage turnout of their supporters that sought to, frankly, marginalize Arab-Israeli citizens.
The United States and this administration is deeply concerned by divisive rhetoric that seeks to marginalize Arab-Israeli citizens," White House press secretary Josh Earnest told the media aboard Air Force One today. "It undermines the values and democratic ideals that have been important to our democracy and an important part of what binds the United States and Israel together. We’ve talked a lot about how our shared values are an important part of what binds our two countries together, and rhetoric that seeks to marginalize one segment of their population is deeply concerning and it is divisive. And I can tell you that these are views that the administration intends to communicate directly to the Israelis."
