GannonFan wrote:Still laughing that you 1) actually know who was refereeing an international game of women's American football and 2) that you watched a whole game of it and made an evaluation of the referee in it. I thought April 1st was a few days ago!
Not an April Fools joke. Every broadcast game introduces the crew chief, regardless of sport, right? The same thing happened with the WWC. She was really good, better than anyone currently officiating here in the States that I've seen, so naturally I remembered her. I wish she'd apply to the NFL, because she'd be right at the top within a few years.GannonFan wrote:Still laughing that you 1) actually know who was refereeing an international game of women's American football and 2) that you watched a whole game of it and made an evaluation of the referee in it. I thought April 1st was a few days ago!
HHHmmmm. Exactly what channel are you watching Finland vs Canada in girls football? And don't you still have over the air reception?SuperHornet wrote:Not an April Fools joke. Every broadcast game introduces the crew chief, regardless of sport, right? The same thing happened with the WWC. She was really good, better than anyone currently officiating here in the States that I've seen, so naturally I remembered her. I wish she'd apply to the NFL, because she'd be right at the top within a few years.GannonFan wrote:Still laughing that you 1) actually know who was refereeing an international game of women's American football and 2) that you watched a whole game of it and made an evaluation of the referee in it. I thought April 1st was a few days ago!
/threadGannonFan wrote:Still laughing that you 1) actually know who was refereeing an international game of women's American football and 2) that you watched a whole game of it and made an evaluation of the referee in it. I thought April 1st was a few days ago!
He's right about Sam.dbackjon wrote:http://nypost.com/2015/04/05/nfls-femal ... nt-jaguar/
By questioning the lengths the NFL goes to for publicity, Sen’Derrick Marks has invited some bad publicity upon himself.
With one analogy, the Jaguars defensive lineman swiped at the NFL and insulted the credentials of Michael Sam and the NFL’s newest ref.
“It’s just like the Michael Sam situation — if he wasn’t gay, he would have gone undrafted,’’ Marks told TMZ concerning the hiring of Sarah Thomas, who will be the first full-time, non-replacement official in the league. “Instead, the league drafts him because I think they are trying to monopolize every aspect of the world. The same thing with a female ref.
“For the league, it’s great publicity. The NFL is all about monopolizing every opportunity.’’
Yeah, don't you hate it when your professional organization takes advantage of positive publicity and monopolizes things both of which benefit you and your paycheck?AZGrizFan wrote:He's right about Sam.dbackjon wrote:http://nypost.com/2015/04/05/nfls-femal ... nt-jaguar/
By questioning the lengths the NFL goes to for publicity, Sen’Derrick Marks has invited some bad publicity upon himself.
With one analogy, the Jaguars defensive lineman swiped at the NFL and insulted the credentials of Michael Sam and the NFL’s newest ref.
“It’s just like the Michael Sam situation — if he wasn’t gay, he would have gone undrafted,’’ Marks told TMZ concerning the hiring of Sarah Thomas, who will be the first full-time, non-replacement official in the league. “Instead, the league drafts him because I think they are trying to monopolize every aspect of the world. The same thing with a female ref.
“For the league, it’s great publicity. The NFL is all about monopolizing every opportunity.’’
Doesn't change the fact that if Sam wasn't gay he woudln't have been drafted.kalm wrote:Yeah, don't you hate it when your professional organization takes advantage of positive publicity and monopolizes things both of which benefit you and your paycheck?AZGrizFan wrote:
He's right about Sam.
Sure, but why bitch about it and use a Z-like analogy?AZGrizFan wrote:Doesn't change the fact that if Sam wasn't gay he woudln't have been drafted.kalm wrote:
Yeah, don't you hate it when your professional organization takes advantage of positive publicity and monopolizes things both of which benefit you and your paycheck?
Wow. He even sucks at being a faggot.SuperHornet wrote:Sam just got kicked off DWTS....
ASUG8 wrote:
LOOK GUYS!!! NO TITS! NO TITS AT ALL!!
It's all about who she bl... er, I mean, knows!SuperHornet wrote:Thomas has been made a line judge. It won't take her very long to get from there back to referee....
93henfan wrote:It's all about who she bl... er, I mean, knows!SuperHornet wrote:Thomas has been made a line judge. It won't take her very long to get from there back to referee....
93 just got pwned!dbackjon wrote:93henfan wrote:
It's all about who she bl... er, I mean, knows!
So that is how you got your government job!!
3) that a women's American football game was on TVGannonFan wrote:Still laughing that you 1) actually know who was refereeing an international game of women's American football and 2) that you watched a whole game of it and made an evaluation of the referee in it. I thought April 1st was a few days ago!
SuperHornet wrote:I hope she measures up to the example set by Anni Tahtinen, the Finnish referee in charge of the 2013 Women's World Championship Final, who arbitered an absolutely FLAWLESS game ultimately won by the US Women's National Team over a game Canadian squad. Tahtinen is the best referee I've seen since Jerry Markbreit retired....
