Good article. Of, course it is the drive-by media, so it is riddled with anti-Conk posion...
"To truly succeed at governing, the party needs to create a foundation that has voters believing Republicans want to govern again, not just tear down Democrats or the government "
(Dumbfucks.)
"Things for the Republicans are bad, very bad. It is worse than just about any Republican wants to admit.
The party is defined too much by social issues and the brands of Bush and Cheney, rather than by what some in the party wish to define it by, mainly, limited government, personal freedom and a strong national defense.
One could argue the GOP made no progress on limiting government in their four years of total control, from 2002 to 2006. If anything, government expanded like never before.
From the Medicare prescription drug plan, to the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, and the passage of No Child Left Behind, President Bush presided over a major expansion of the reach of government.
Individually, strong cases can be made for all of these programs. But the big picture is clear for all to see: Under Republican rule, government got bigger and more intrusive.
Which brings us to personal freedoms: From the legislating of morality (Schiavo as the prime example), to the various conservative-led state bans on gay marriage, the Republicans did very little to expand personal freedoms and if anything looked like the party trying to take freedoms away."
Bad, bad Conks! Your base, as defined by the leader of the Republican Party, pictured below, has led you to nothing but ridicule. See you in, oh, 2034!

"HatehatehateJesushatehate! Hatehate! Hate! Hate! HatehateReaganhatehate!
HatehatehateWelfareMomshatehatehate!"








