- 1. Montana _____________7-1_____9-2_____ Montana's defense = good; other Big Sky defenses = Stitt
2. Eastern Washington__7-1_____8-3_____ The QB(s) aren't as good, but the Eags should still be in the playoffs
3. Idaho State __________6-2_____8-3_____ Beating UNLV could be very important for the Bengals' postseason hopes
4. Montana State _______6-2_____8-3_____ Not a bad record for the worst defense in the league
5. Cal Poly _____________6-2_____7-4_____ A late playoff surge is possible if the 'Stangs can survive their first-half gauntlet
6. Northern Arizona ____5-3_____6-5_____ Will the 'Jacks still stick with Kyren Poe even if the (new) other guy is better?
7. Portland State_______ 3-5_____4-7_____ Can Kieran McDonagh return to his 2013 form?
8. North Dakota ________3-5_____4-7_____ UND has excellent run D, but that's not the biggest factor in the pass-happy Big Sky
9. Weber State__________3-5_____3-8_____ Seven straight years without a desperately needed non-DI opponent…
10.UC Davis ___________ 2-6_____3-8_____ Ben Scott emerged as a good QB last year, but he doesn't have a ton of help
11.Sacramento State ___ 2-6_____4-7 _____ Jody Sears was smart to sign a 3-year contract…
12.Southern Utah _______1-7_____2-9_____ The T-Birds wasted a lot of defensive talent last year
13.Northern Colorado___1-7_____3-8_____ The Bears were dumb to give Earnest Collins a 3-year extension…
Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
-
- Level5
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
-
- Level5
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Bests & Worsts
- Best Rushing Offense - Cal Poly
Worst Rushing Offense - Northern Colorado
Best Passing Offense - Eastern Washington
Worst Passing Offense - North Dakota
Best Overall Offense - Montana St.
Worst Overall Offense - North Dakota
Best Run Defense - North Dakota
Worst Run Defense - Sacramento St.
Best Pass Defense - Northern Arizona
Worst Pass Defense - Montana St.
Best Overall Defense - Montana
Worst Overall Defense - Montana St.
Best Special Teams - Montana St.
Worst Special Teams - Cal Poly
Best Quarterback - Dakota Prukop (MSU)
Best Running Back - Xavier Finney (ISU)
Best Wide Receiver - Cooper Kupp (EWU)
Best Tight End - Josh Cook (ISU)
Best WR/TE Corps - Eastern Washington
Best Offensive Lineman - Clay DeBord (EWU)
Best Offensive Line - Portland St.
Best Defensive Lineman - James Cowser (SUU)
Best Defensive Line - Montana
Best Linebacker - Mario Jenkins (ISU)
Best LB Corps - Montana
Best Defensive Back - Marcus Alford (NAU)
Best Secondary - Northern Arizona
Best Kicker - Brad Cornish (SAC)
Best Punter - Trevor Bolton (MSU)
Best Ret. Specialist - Ellis Henderson (UMT)
Best Return Teams - Montana
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
Bold prediction about Montana's D-Line...so who's Montana's league loss to, IYHO?
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
-
- Level5
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
I'm not sure who else would get best D-Line. Only 3 Big Sky teams figure to be even decent on defense.AZGrizFan wrote:Bold prediction about Montana's D-Line...so who's Montana's league loss to, IYHO?
I have the Griz losing to ISU & Liberty.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
If they lose to ISU and Liberty, there's no WAY they're going 9-2. On the spectrum of potential losses, I'd say it goes something like this:Mvemjsunpx wrote:I'm not sure who else would get best D-Line. Only 3 Big Sky teams figure to be even decent on defense.AZGrizFan wrote:Bold prediction about Montana's D-Line...so who's Montana's league loss to, IYHO?
I have the Griz losing to ISU & Liberty.
NDSU
EWU
Cal Poly
ISU
NAU
Liberty
MSU
UND
PSU
Weber
UC Davis
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
-
- Level5
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
Except EWU, Cal Poly, and NAU are all home games. ISU & Liberty are not. I'm also not totally drinking the Kool-Aid on Cal Poly this year—they should be UM's "easiest" non-conference game.AZGrizFan wrote: If they lose to ISU and Liberty, there's no WAY they're going 9-2. On the spectrum of potential losses, I'd say it goes something like this:
NDSU
EWU
Cal Poly
ISU
NAU
Liberty
MSU
UND
PSU
Weber
UC Davis
Last edited by Mvemjsunpx on Sun Jul 26, 2015 8:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 62329
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
The Kool-Aid for a first year coach with a new system and losses at QB and all three levels of D must taste sweet!Mvemjsunpx wrote:Except EWU, Cal Poly, and NAU are all home games. ISU & Liberty are not. I'm also not drinking the Kool-Aid on Cal Poly this year—they should be UM's "easiest" non-conference game.AZGrizFan wrote: If they lose to ISU and Liberty, there's no WAY they're going 9-2. On the spectrum of potential losses, I'd say it goes something like this:
NDSU
EWU
Cal Poly
ISU
NAU
Liberty
MSU
UND
PSU
Weber
UC Davis
-
- Level5
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
All 3 levels of D?kalm wrote:The Kool-Aid for a first year coach with a new system and losses at QB and all three levels of D must taste sweet!Mvemjsunpx wrote:
Except EWU, Cal Poly, and NAU are all home games. ISU & Liberty are not. I'm also not drinking the Kool-Aid on Cal Poly this year—they should be UM's "easiest" non-conference game.
- SDHornet
- Supporter
- Posts: 19496
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
I think our range is 3-7 wins. Your 4 win prediction falls in that so I'm not going to argue that. I will argue the worst rushing defense though. We return size, experience and depth on the interior of the DL and have stud Sankey backing them up. We will be unknown/unproven on the ends so that could be the weakness. I think that should be enough to keep us out of the worst rushing defense conversation.
If our OL gels and Kniffin can find a grove I think we get 5-6 wins and finish in the middle of the BSC as usual.
Also I think Hennie will have a shot at best return specialist and Sankey as best LB (if he stays healthy).
If our OL gels and Kniffin can find a grove I think we get 5-6 wins and finish in the middle of the BSC as usual.
Also I think Hennie will have a shot at best return specialist and Sankey as best LB (if he stays healthy).
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
Cal Poly's offense will be a top 5 FCS offense if they stay healthy. Cal Poly did not have a great D in 2014 and they lose two great LBs in Dzubnar and Ontko. That said they will be better and deeper on the D-line and secondary in 2014 and overall I think a better D. Cal Poly's biggest challenge in 2015 will be their schedule which is brutal. If the get through the first 6 games at 4-2 the Sky is the limit. Cal Poly won't be an easy out for any team on their schedule with the exception of Arizona State.Mvemjsunpx wrote:I'm also not totally drinking the Kool-Aid on Cal Poly this year—they should be UM's "easiest" non-conference game.
- SuperHornet
- SuperHornet
- Posts: 20548
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 7:24 pm
- I am a fan of: Sac State
- Location: Twentynine Palms, CA
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
All right. I'LL be the one to say it. The Sac prediction here is so bogus it's laughable. We are NOT going to beat just Davis and one other cupcake in league. The middle-to-upper reaches of SD's range is most likely. I see the POTENTIAL to go as high as 11-0 (even the UW game is by no means an auto-loss, though it's also nowhere near a gimme). Do we have to win conference to get you guys to believe that we're at least mid-range? SMH....
SuperHornet's Athletics Hall of Fame includes Jacksonville State kicker Ashley Martin, the first girl to score in a Division I football game. She kicked 3 PATs in a 2001 game for J-State.
- Brock Landers
- Level2
- Posts: 2213
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 3:34 pm
- I am a fan of: Things
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
Addition by subtractionkalm wrote:The Kool-Aid for a first year coach
-
- Moderator Team
- Posts: 10779
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
- A.K.A.: The Russian
- Location: Missoula, MT
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
Brock Landers wrote:Addition by subtractionkalm wrote:The Kool-Aid for a first year coach
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
SDHornet is a lot more realistic than SuperHornet. UC Davis Aggies will vary from maybe a low of three wins to at most six wins. I'm predicting a 5-6 record optimistically but I've been disappointed by the Aggies multiple times in the recent past.
- SDHornet
- Supporter
- Posts: 19496
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
It's not officially football season until SH predicts an 11-0 season for the Hornets...oh look, it's officially football season.GoAgs72 wrote:SDHornet is a lot more realistic than SuperHornet. UC Davis Aggies will vary from maybe a low of three wins to at most six wins. I'm predicting a 5-6 record optimistically but I've been disappointed by the Aggies multiple times in the recent past.
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 62329
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
My bad. Thought you lost a lb but that was Tripp and Coyle last year.Mvemjsunpx wrote:All 3 levels of D?kalm wrote:
The Kool-Aid for a first year coach with a new system and losses at QB and all three levels of D must taste sweet!
Still...
-
- Level5
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
Right. Also, keep in mind the Griz return several key players they didn't have last year.kalm wrote:My bad. Thought you lost a lb but that was Tripp and Coyle last year.Mvemjsunpx wrote:
All 3 levels of D?
Still...
-
- Level5
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
Sac's run defense was pretty bad last year (allowed 5.3 ypc) and they lost a bit of production in the front 7 (http://home.comcast.net/~keepersfootball/fcsstats.htm). Most of the Big Sky figures to have lousy run D, though. I thought "Worst Run Defense" was really a pick'em between Sac, Cal Poly, & MSU with a few other teams close "behind."SDHornet wrote:I think our range is 3-7 wins. Your 4 win prediction falls in that so I'm not going to argue that. I will argue the worst rushing defense though. We return size, experience and depth on the interior of the DL and have stud Sankey backing them up. We will be unknown/unproven on the ends so that could be the weakness. I think that should be enough to keep us out of the worst rushing defense conversation.
If our OL gels and Kniffin can find a grove I think we get 5-6 wins and finish in the middle of the BSC as usual.
Also I think Hennie will have a shot at best return specialist and Sankey as best LB (if he stays healthy).
-
- Level5
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
I have Cal Poly's offense pretty much tied with MSU for best, but their D looks like it'll be quite weak (worse than last year) and the Mustang special teams look to be easily the worst in the conference.SloStang wrote:Cal Poly's offense will be a top 5 FCS offense if they stay healthy. Cal Poly did not have a great D in 2014 and they lose two great LBs in Dzubnar and Ontko. That said they will be better and deeper on the D-line and secondary in 2014 and overall I think a better D. Cal Poly's biggest challenge in 2015 will be their schedule which is brutal. If the get through the first 6 games at 4-2 the Sky is the limit. Cal Poly won't be an easy out for any team on their schedule with the exception of Arizona State.Mvemjsunpx wrote:I'm also not totally drinking the Kool-Aid on Cal Poly this year—they should be UM's "easiest" non-conference game.
They're pretty good, but not great.
-
- Supporter
- Posts: 62329
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 3:36 pm
- I am a fan of: Eastern
- A.K.A.: Humus The Proud
- Location: Northern Palouse
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
Who else besides Henderson?Mvemjsunpx wrote:Right. Also, keep in mind the Griz return several key players they didn't have last year.kalm wrote:
My bad. Thought you lost a lb but that was Tripp and Coyle last year.
Still...
- SDHornet
- Supporter
- Posts: 19496
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 12:50 pm
- I am a fan of: Sacramento State Hornets
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
The point scoring system explains why it emphasized the DL departures for Sac as the bulk of DL tackles was by the departed starting DEs (69 of 185 recorded tackles, assisted tackles not included). We have 4 DTs returning that have a combined 27 starts and 66 appearances between them. When I think rushing defense, clogging up the interior comes to mind first and I think we are covered there. We will be very inexperienced at DE though so that may very well be a weakness. We'll see how it plays out.Mvemjsunpx wrote:Sac's run defense was pretty bad last year (allowed 5.3 ypc) and they lost a bit of production in the front 7 (http://home.comcast.net/~keepersfootball/fcsstats.htm). Most of the Big Sky figures to have lousy run D, though. I thought "Worst Run Defense" was really a pick'em between Sac, Cal Poly, & MSU with a few other teams close "behind."SDHornet wrote:I think our range is 3-7 wins. Your 4 win prediction falls in that so I'm not going to argue that. I will argue the worst rushing defense though. We return size, experience and depth on the interior of the DL and have stud Sankey backing them up. We will be unknown/unproven on the ends so that could be the weakness. I think that should be enough to keep us out of the worst rushing defense conversation.
If our OL gels and Kniffin can find a grove I think we get 5-6 wins and finish in the middle of the BSC as usual.
Also I think Hennie will have a shot at best return specialist and Sankey as best LB (if he stays healthy).
-
- Level4
- Posts: 5306
- Joined: Tue May 05, 2009 11:04 pm
- I am a fan of: Portland State
- A.K.A.: JALMOND
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
You got some inside information that McDonough is going to be the QB? Word is that it is a 4 player race after spring ball between McDonough, Penn, Kraght, and Kuresa. From insider Scott Hood...Mvemjsunpx wrote:
- 7. Portland State_______ 3-5_____4-7_____ Can Kieran McDonagh return to his 2013 form?
http://psuvikingtales.com/spring-cleaning-quarterbacks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Three conference wins is a stretch, I'm thinking we will be lucky to get two (North Dakota and Southern Utah) if that. Western Oregon will be a tough one this year as well. But, having an interim coach with delusions of grandeur will no doubt make for an interesting season, for sure. May not win a single game, but it will be interesting.
- AZGrizFan
- Supporter
- Posts: 59959
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 4:40 pm
- I am a fan of: Sexual Chocolate
- Location: Just to the right of center
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
NAU and CP rolled us last time out. I'm not looking at EITHER of them as an easy out until we put them back in their place.SloStang wrote:Cal Poly's offense will be a top 5 FCS offense if they stay healthy. Cal Poly did not have a great D in 2014 and they lose two great LBs in Dzubnar and Ontko. That said they will be better and deeper on the D-line and secondary in 2014 and overall I think a better D. Cal Poly's biggest challenge in 2015 will be their schedule which is brutal. If the get through the first 6 games at 4-2 the Sky is the limit. Cal Poly won't be an easy out for any team on their schedule with the exception of Arizona State.Mvemjsunpx wrote:I'm also not totally drinking the Kool-Aid on Cal Poly this year—they should be UM's "easiest" non-conference game.
"Ah fuck. You are right." KYJelly, 11/6/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
"The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam." Barack Obama, 9/25/12
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
Look at the stats from last season and Cal Poly was the 4th best D in both scoring and total defense. Only Montana, UND and NAU were better statistically. They will be a better D in 2015 because they will be much better and deeper along the d-line and secondary and they will be supported by a very talented and deep offensive unit.Mvemjsunpx wrote:I have Cal Poly's offense pretty much tied with MSU for best, but their D looks like it'll be quite weak (worse than last year) and the Mustang special teams look to be easily the worst in the conference.SloStang wrote:Cal Poly's offense will be a top 5 FCS offense if they stay healthy. Cal Poly did not have a great D in 2014 and they lose two great LBs in Dzubnar and Ontko. That said they will be better and deeper on the D-line and secondary in 2014 and overall I think a better D. Cal Poly's biggest challenge in 2015 will be their schedule which is brutal. If the get through the first 6 games at 4-2 the Sky is the limit. Cal Poly won't be an easy out for any team on their schedule with the exception of Arizona State.
They're pretty good, but not great.
As far as special teams go last year our kicker/punter was hurt in the first game and missed the season. We might not be great on special teams, but we will certainly be better in 2015 just for the fact that it will be hard to be worse.
-
- Level5
- Posts: 14138
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2007 2:44 pm
- I am a fan of: Montana
Re: Big Sky Standings/Player Prediction Thread
Portland State has more talent than a lot of teams—I think there's more variance to how they'll end up than most any other squad here.JALMOND wrote:You got some inside information that McDonough is going to be the QB? Word is that it is a 4 player race after spring ball between McDonough, Penn, Kraght, and Kuresa. From insider Scott Hood...Mvemjsunpx wrote:
- 7. Portland State_______ 3-5_____4-7_____ Can Kieran McDonagh return to his 2013 form?
http://psuvikingtales.com/spring-cleaning-quarterbacks/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Three conference wins is a stretch, I'm thinking we will be lucky to get two (North Dakota and Southern Utah) if that. Western Oregon will be a tough one this year as well. But, having an interim coach with delusions of grandeur will no doubt make for an interesting season, for sure. May not win a single game, but it will be interesting.
I assumed McDonagh would be the starter since he has been the last two years. At any rate: if whoever the QB is can be as good as McDonagh was as a Sophomore, the Viking offense could be one of the best in the league. PSU's passing game was awful last year, though.