I'm starting to detect a pattern as I read the Tesla fanboi sites Electrek and CleanTechnica.
CleanTechnica, as I noted earlier in this thread, is run by Tesla investors. They state it at the bottom of their page.
As far as Electrek, I'll let this Tweet by Electrek owner and publisher Seth Weintraub speak for itself:
Every single article by CleanTechnica and Electrek fluffs the Tesla and bashes, in particular, the BMW M3. It seems to be the benchmark they are hoping the Tesla can match.
Why do I bring all of this up?
Let's go back to a quote referenced (but not linked) by an unnamed poster earlier in this thread. The quote was:
The Tesla Model 3 just broke the Leguna Seca production model speed track record
"The Model 3 even managed to beat some “track-prepared BMW M3’s” coming in at over $100K
“It was faster than a number of track-prepared BMW M3’s, some of which came on a trailer and aren’t street vehicles. Our Model 3 is 100% street and of course passes smog and noise regulations."
So I used Google (as unnamed poster said I might want to try) and found that article.
Guess who published it?
Our good friend Seth Weintraub at Electrek!
Here is the link:
https://electrek.co/2018/12/12/tesla-mo ... ev-record/
Now, you'll find a very interesting nugget about halfway into the article, tucked conveniently right after an attention-grabbing YouTube video:
But to be fair, while the vehicle can be considered a “production vehicle”, it did get a suspension upgrade from Mountain Pass Performance.
WhoWHAT?!?!?!?
This so-called "production vehicle" had been gutted of the Tesla production suspension and upgraded with a custom suspension. Suspension is
absolutely critical to performance on a tight road course such as Laguna Seca, and they are passing off an aftermarket custom tuned suspension as a production vehicle?
This is intellectual dishonesty.
So what can a true production Tesla Model 3 really do around Laguna Seca?