Ibanez wrote:Rodent is a fine meal...I think.Ivytalk wrote:![]()
True dat. I'd have to ask JSO how many nutria it takes to make a meal. Gotta be fewer than muskrats.
Dog, dog is a fine meal.
Ibanez wrote:Rodent is a fine meal...I think.Ivytalk wrote:![]()
True dat. I'd have to ask JSO how many nutria it takes to make a meal. Gotta be fewer than muskrats.

And Trump will have both sides fighting him tooth and nail on every little thing. Cruz will have the complete backing of the radical portion of the GOP, his insane policies are more likely to become law.GannonFan wrote:Nonsense, we have that choice - megalomania vs ideology - right now with Trump vs Cruz, and if I had to vote today between those two as my only choices I'd vote against Cruz in a heartbeat. Trump is a buffoon, Cruz is evil. There's a difference. Heck.Ivytalk wrote: Jesus, DSU, you sound like a male version of "Diamond and Silk." What makes you think that Trump has any allegiance to the best interests of the country as a whole -- if he even knows what they are ("I saw it on the Internet")? JHTFC.![]()
And GF tripped over his well-polished centrist dong here. "Not beholden to a particular ideology"? You bet -- megalomaniacs and pathological liars know only the Ideology of the Self. Given that choice, I'll take ideology! Heck.


yes it isBaldy wrote:Ibanez wrote:
Rodent is a fine meal...I think.![]()
Dog, dog is a fine meal.

I think since the nuclear option was triggered you could actually see both sides just try to wait out the other when it comes to SCOTUS. Heck, you could see a five judge panel for awhile depending on how spaced out the dying is.DSUrocks07 wrote:And Trump will have both sides fighting him tooth and nail on every little thing. Cruz will have the complete backing of the radical portion of the GOP, his insane policies are more likely to become law.GannonFan wrote:
Nonsense, we have that choice - megalomania vs ideology - right now with Trump vs Cruz, and if I had to vote today between those two as my only choices I'd vote against Cruz in a heartbeat. Trump is a buffoon, Cruz is evil. There's a difference. Heck.
Also how ironic would it be to have a true outsider being able to potentially appoint up to four members to the Supreme Court.
This man speaks the gosh-honest truth!GannonFan wrote:Nonsense, we have that choice - megalomania vs ideology - right now with Trump vs Cruz, and if I had to vote today between those two as my only choices I'd vote against Cruz in a heartbeat. Trump is a buffoon, Cruz is evil. There's a difference. Heck.Ivytalk wrote: Jesus, DSU, you sound like a male version of "Diamond and Silk." What makes you think that Trump has any allegiance to the best interests of the country as a whole -- if he even knows what they are ("I saw it on the Internet")? JHTFC.![]()
And GF tripped over his well-polished centrist dong here. "Not beholden to a particular ideology"? You bet -- megalomaniacs and pathological liars know only the Ideology of the Self. Given that choice, I'll take ideology! Heck.

The above post is living proof that even a broke clock is right twice a day.Chizzang wrote:Meh... it was all about who's idea it was (or wasn't)Baldy wrote:
From the look of the vote, it looks like the Donks are the only ones who take money from Big Pharma and Insurance.
If Bush drafted the exact same Affordable Care Act he'd have been stoned to death by the press
For creating an abomination and profit center for giant corporations
![]()
But since it was Obama's idea it was universally dismissed on the other side of the island


He speaks namby-pamby psychobabble. GF starts with the Baader-Meinhof fallacy about Cruz: because the press fairly recently called Cruz "the most despised man in Washington," or the "evil" equivalent, and that concept now seems to pop up everywhere, it must be so. And then, in a more troubling exercise of cognitive dissonance, GF labels the psychotic Trump as a mere "buffoon" who, despite his lack of judgment, temperament and veracity, can somehow be shape-shifted into a model public servant who will make wise decisions and appoint splendidly moderate Supreme Court justices.93henfan wrote:This man speaks the gosh-honest truth!GannonFan wrote:
Nonsense, we have that choice - megalomania vs ideology - right now with Trump vs Cruz, and if I had to vote today between those two as my only choices I'd vote against Cruz in a heartbeat. Trump is a buffoon, Cruz is evil. There's a difference. Heck.

Nonsense, I don't think he'll be shape-shifted into a model public servant, Donald's too consistent for that, he'll always be a buffoon no matter if he wins or not.Ivytalk wrote:He speaks namby-pamby psychobabble. GF starts with the Baader-Meinhof fallacy about Cruz: because the press fairly recently called Cruz "the most despised man in Washington," or the "evil" equivalent, and that concept now seems to pop up everywhere, it must be so. And then, in a more troubling exercise of cognitive dissonance, GF labels the psychotic Trump as a mere "buffoon" who, despite his lack of judgment, temperament and veracity, can somehow be shape-shifted into a model public servant who will make wise decisions and appoint splendidly moderate Supreme Court justices.93henfan wrote:
This man speaks the gosh-honest truth!
And don't even get me started on DSURocks. He's just a Markell Democrat in disguise.

Jesus Hecking Christ! IT is going bat poop crazy with the insults here! Kalm the heck down!Ivytalk wrote:He speaks namby-pamby psychobabble. GF starts with the Baader-Meinhof fallacy about Cruz: because the press fairly recently called Cruz "the most despised man in Washington," or the "evil" equivalent, and that concept now seems to pop up everywhere, it must be so. And then, in a more troubling exercise of cognitive dissonance, GF labels the psychotic Trump as a mere "buffoon" who, despite his lack of judgment, temperament and veracity, can somehow be shape-shifted into a model public servant who will make wise decisions and appoint splendidly moderate Supreme Court justices.93henfan wrote:
This man speaks the gosh-honest truth!
And don't even get me started on DSURocks. He's just a Markell Democrat in disguise.

Whatever you do, don't make a joke about his Ivy League background, that stuff's taboo!kalm wrote:Jesus Hecking Christ! IT is going bat poop crazy with the insults here! Kalm the heck down!Ivytalk wrote:
He speaks namby-pamby psychobabble. GF starts with the Baader-Meinhof fallacy about Cruz: because the press fairly recently called Cruz "the most despised man in Washington," or the "evil" equivalent, and that concept now seems to pop up everywhere, it must be so. And then, in a more troubling exercise of cognitive dissonance, GF labels the psychotic Trump as a mere "buffoon" who, despite his lack of judgment, temperament and veracity, can somehow be shape-shifted into a model public servant who will make wise decisions and appoint splendidly moderate Supreme Court justices.
And don't even get me started on DSURocks. He's just a Markell Democrat in disguise.

Forgive me! It's The Donald Effect!kalm wrote:Jesus Hecking Christ! IT is going bat poop crazy with the insults here! Kalm the heck down!Ivytalk wrote:
He speaks namby-pamby psychobabble. GF starts with the Baader-Meinhof fallacy about Cruz: because the press fairly recently called Cruz "the most despised man in Washington," or the "evil" equivalent, and that concept now seems to pop up everywhere, it must be so. And then, in a more troubling exercise of cognitive dissonance, GF labels the psychotic Trump as a mere "buffoon" who, despite his lack of judgment, temperament and veracity, can somehow be shape-shifted into a model public servant who will make wise decisions and appoint splendidly moderate Supreme Court justices.
And don't even get me started on DSURocks. He's just a Markell Democrat in disguise.

Blame it on Bernie's people!!!Ivytalk wrote:Forgive me! It's The Donald Effect!kalm wrote:
Jesus Hecking Christ! IT is going bat poop crazy with the insults here! Kalm the heck down!![]()
![]()

I kind of like Bernie. Not his policies, but the guy.GannonFan wrote:Blame it on Bernie's people!!!Ivytalk wrote: Forgive me! It's The Donald Effect!![]()
![]()

How could you not like him - he's the spitting image of Larry David. I think I'm watching an SNL spoof or a Seinfeld episode everytime I see him. If he would turn around and start talking I swear he'd be George Steinbrenner. Someone's got to ask him about Jay Buhner and see what he does. Him and Trump are both that way - they are real life political caricatures of themselves.Ivytalk wrote:I kind of like Bernie. Not his policies, but the guy.GannonFan wrote:
Blame it on Bernie's people!!!

Well put, GF. Heck!GannonFan wrote:How could you not like him - he's the spitting image of Larry David. I think I'm watching an SNL spoof or a Seinfeld episode everytime I see him. If he would turn around and start talking I swear he'd be George Steinbrenner. Someone's got to ask him about Jay Buhner and see what he does. Him and Trump are both that way - they are real life political caricatures of themselves.Ivytalk wrote:
I kind of like Bernie. Not his policies, but the guy.

It's their defense mechanism for this age of Tina Fey political satire. This way, no one can one up them with regards to their mannerisms and gibberish since they've gone all triple-dog-dare with their stuff already.Ivytalk wrote:Well put, GF. Heck!GannonFan wrote:
How could you not like him - he's the spitting image of Larry David. I think I'm watching an SNL spoof or a Seinfeld episode everytime I see him. If he would turn around and start talking I swear he'd be George Steinbrenner. Someone's got to ask him about Jay Buhner and see what he does. Him and Trump are both that way - they are real life political caricatures of themselves.
But I still think Trump is worse than a buffoon.

AZGrizFan wrote:The above post is living proof that even a broke clock is right twice a day.Chizzang wrote:
Meh... it was all about who's idea it was (or wasn't)
If Bush drafted the exact same Affordable Care Act he'd have been stoned to death by the press
For creating an abomination and profit center for giant corporations
![]()
But since it was Obama's idea it was universally dismissed on the other side of the island![]()
![]()

OMGosh. Cruz just believes in following the Constitution. You think wanting to follow the Constitution is evil? Trump is a buffoon AND he's evil.Nonsense, we have that choice - megalomania vs ideology - right now with Trump vs Cruz, and if I had to vote today between those two as my only choices I'd vote against Cruz in a heartbeat. Trump is a buffoon, Cruz is evil. There's a difference. Heck.




:vomit:Ivytalk wrote:He speaks namby-pamby psychobabble. GF starts with the Baader-Meinhof fallacy about Cruz: because the press fairly recently called Cruz "the most despised man in Washington," or the "evil" equivalent, and that concept now seems to pop up everywhere, it must be so. And then, in a more troubling exercise of cognitive dissonance, GF labels the psychotic Trump as a mere "buffoon" who, despite his lack of judgment, temperament and veracity, can somehow be shape-shifted into a model public servant who will make wise decisions and appoint splendidly moderate Supreme Court justices.93henfan wrote:
This man speaks the gosh-honest truth!
And don't even get me started on DSURocks. He's just a Markell Democrat in disguise.

Not the best, but he believes in the Constitution. You know what that is, don't you? Trump has no clue about what that great document means. And if you support that bozo, you don't, either.DSUrocks07 wrote::vomit:Ivytalk wrote:
He speaks namby-pamby psychobabble. GF starts with the Baader-Meinhof fallacy about Cruz: because the press fairly recently called Cruz "the most despised man in Washington," or the "evil" equivalent, and that concept now seems to pop up everywhere, it must be so. And then, in a more troubling exercise of cognitive dissonance, GF labels the psychotic Trump as a mere "buffoon" who, despite his lack of judgment, temperament and veracity, can somehow be shape-shifted into a model public servant who will make wise decisions and appoint splendidly moderate Supreme Court justices.
And don't even get me started on DSURocks. He's just a Markell Democrat in disguise.
You really think Cruz is a great pick? You're further gone than I even realized

Ah yes. The "I believe more in the Constitution than you do" argument.Ivytalk wrote:Not the best, but he believes in the Constitution. You know what that is, don't you? Trump has no clue about what that great document means. And if you support that bozo, you don't, either.DSUrocks07 wrote:
:vomit:
You really think Cruz is a great pick? You're further gone than I even realized

If I could've had any candidate I wanted this cycle it would've been Rand Paul. However, Cruz is clearly a strict constructionist. He is what he is and he doesn't hide anything at all.That's why he's so unpopular in the Senate. "Wolf in sheep's clothing" doesn't fit him at all. He's very up front and honest about where he stands. You can not like where he stands. But you can't say he isn't honest about it.Ah yes. The "I believe more in the Constitution than you do" argument.
If that was the case, the Ron Paul should be the bellwether for that movement. And his son Rand would have gotten more traction this election cycle. Cruz believes only in the Constitution when its convienent and politically expedient for him. He's a wolf in sheeps clothing and the radical right is eating that **** up. If you want to be suckered into his delusions, by all means. I won't be.


Give me three facts that support your contention that Cruz isn't a true Constitutional conservative. I think Cruz is an odd duck, and his "Sam I am" filibuster was a joke, but your man Trump has no claim to the Constitutional mantle. For a thinking person, if you're down to these two imperfect candidates, you have only one choice.DSUrocks07 wrote:Ah yes. The "I believe more in the Constitution than you do" argument.Ivytalk wrote: Not the best, but he believes in the Constitution. You know what that is, don't you? Trump has no clue about what that great document means. And if you support that bozo, you don't, either.
If that was the case, the Ron Paul should be the bellwether for that movement. And his son Rand would have gotten more traction this election cycle. Cruz believes only in the Constitution when its convienent and politically expedient for him. He's a wolf in sheeps clothing and the radical right is eating that **** up. If you want to be suckered into his delusions, by all means. I won't be. But what do I know, I'm a "Markell Democrat" all of a sudden, whatever the **** that means.
