Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Political discussions
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by Ibanez »

Skjellyfetti wrote:
BDKJMU wrote:How about just "Bathroom or "Restroom"?
Those are both euphemisms!


When is the last time you've seen a bath in a public shitter? When is the last time you've gone to take a "rest" in a public shitter?
Not sure if you're joking or what...
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14681
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by Skjellyfetti »

Yes. :lol:

Laughing at the people getting worked up about euphemisms for bathrooms.
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by 93henfan »

Working in downtown DC, I have seen people taking both baths and rests in the restrooms. :D
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by 89Hen »

Skjellyfetti wrote:"Gender neutral restroom" doesn't see like something to lose your shit before.

Seems like just rephrased "unisex" bathrooms - which make sense, imo.

Not for any social justice reason... but, if it's just a single commode... I don't get why it should be segregated. :?
I don't disagree, but these were 6-7 stall his/her shitters that they converted to unisex. The bigger issue here is urinals are going to be a thing of the past. Can't really have them in unisex bathroom. :thumbdown:
Image
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by 89Hen »

Skjellyfetti wrote:Seems you and 89 are the ones offended by unisex bathrooms - that have been around since at least the past 20 years. :lol:
See my above post.
Image
bandl
Towson
Towson
Posts: 18498
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:30 pm

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by bandl »

andy7171 wrote:As far as 89's experience. I would feel awkward following two females into a bathroom. If they were hot, I'd have to fight the urge to look over the wall. Or feel pressure to "push" the pee out to make it sound like I have a giant powerful tool pissing into a bowl. If they were ugly, don't want to be accused of the same actions.
As usual, Andy here is the only one who speaks truth and really understands the gist of the dilemma for most men.
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14681
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by Skjellyfetti »

89Hen wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:"Gender neutral restroom" doesn't see like something to lose your shit before.

Seems like just rephrased "unisex" bathrooms - which make sense, imo.

Not for any social justice reason... but, if it's just a single commode... I don't get why it should be segregated. :?
I don't disagree, but these were 6-7 stall his/her shitters that they converted to unisex. The bigger issue here is urinals are going to be a thing of the past. Can't really have them in unisex bathroom. :thumbdown:
Can't say I'm surprised to be having this discussion with a Delaware fan.

True connoisseurs of the genre ;)
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
bandl
Towson
Towson
Posts: 18498
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:30 pm

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by bandl »

89Hen wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:The bigger issue here is urinals are going to be a thing of the past. Can't really have them in unisex bathroom. :thumbdown:
I can't remember the restaurant, but in NYC a couple months ago there was a 'unisex' restroom. Signs in the restaurant simply stated "Restroom". One big room, all the sinks/mirrors down the middle, stalls on the side with doors floor to ceiling, 5 or 6 to each side. Instead of Male or Female, Guy/Girl, She/He, etc. it was just a picture on each door of either a urinal or a toilet. It was roughly a 2 toilet to 1 urinal ratio.
User avatar
andy7171
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 27951
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
I am a fan of: Wiping.
A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
Location: Eastern Palouse

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by andy7171 »

bandl wrote:
89Hen wrote:
I can't remember the restaurant, but in NYC a couple months ago there was a 'unisex' restroom. Signs in the restaurant simply stated "Restroom". One big room, all the sinks/mirrors down the middle, stalls on the side with doors floor to ceiling, 5 or 6 to each side. Instead of Male or Female, Guy/Girl, She/He, etc. it was just a picture on each door of either a urinal or a toilet. It was roughly a 2 toilet to 1 urinal ratio.
Fuck New York City! :mrgreen:
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
bandl
Towson
Towson
Posts: 18498
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:30 pm

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by bandl »

andy7171 wrote:
bandl wrote:
I can't remember the restaurant, but in NYC a couple months ago there was a 'unisex' restroom. Signs in the restaurant simply stated "Restroom". One big room, all the sinks/mirrors down the middle, stalls on the side with doors floor to ceiling, 5 or 6 to each side. Instead of Male or Female, Guy/Girl, She/He, etc. it was just a picture on each door of either a urinal or a toilet. It was roughly a 2 toilet to 1 urinal ratio.
Fuck New York City! :mrgreen:
ya sure
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by 89Hen »

Skjellyfetti wrote:
89Hen wrote: I don't disagree, but these were 6-7 stall his/her shitters that they converted to unisex. The bigger issue here is urinals are going to be a thing of the past. Can't really have them in unisex bathroom. :thumbdown:
Can't say I'm surprised to be having this discussion with a Delaware fan.

True connoisseurs of the genre ;)
Hell yeah. My favorite pisser besides the granite wall was one at Devil's Backbone Brewery. Looked like a big, claw foot bath tub filled with ice. I was nervous there would be a lot of splash, but the ice just gave way as you went.

But you agree that two, big, multi-stall bathrooms next to each other and both being gender neutral is odd? So the 1 transgender person now is comfortable, while the 10,000 others that visit each day are not. :coffee:
Image
User avatar
andy7171
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 27951
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
I am a fan of: Wiping.
A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
Location: Eastern Palouse

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by andy7171 »

Doesn't even address #2. Fuck that in front of females.
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by GannonFan »

andy7171 wrote:Doesn't even address #2. **** that in front of females.
Truth be told, if there's going to be pushback, it will be from the females. I don't get the sense that guys give a crap where they go or who's watching. It's the females that will, when subjected to the idea of having to share bathrooms with guys, could speak up. Even when I was in college almost every floor was coed (they didn't allow in-room coed yet, not sure if they do now either) and there was always a vote on whether to make the two baths/shower rooms on each floor unisex or boy/girl. It almost always was voted by the girls to have a girls only bathroom and in the rare cases the vote went all unisex, the griping from the females was significant. Seeing how the three boys I have now use their bathroom, it's clear to me that the next generation of males isn't going to be any better taking care of business in the bathroom than the hordes of males that came before them. :ohno:
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by YoUDeeMan »

GannonFan wrote:
andy7171 wrote:Doesn't even address #2. **** that in front of females.
Truth be told, if there's going to be pushback, it will be from the females. I don't get the sense that guys give a crap where they go or who's watching. It's the females that will, when subjected to the idea of having to share bathrooms with guys, could speak up. Even when I was in college almost every floor was coed (they didn't allow in-room coed yet, not sure if they do now either) and there was always a vote on whether to make the two baths/shower rooms on each floor unisex or boy/girl. It almost always was voted by the girls to have a girls only bathroom and in the rare cases the vote went all unisex, the griping from the females was significant. Seeing how the three boys I have now use their bathroom, it's clear to me that the next generation of males isn't going to be any better taking care of business in the bathroom than the hordes of males that came before them. :ohno:
Hey, Carlin forgot to mention that men are bowl challenged. :thumb:
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by GannonFan »

Cluck U wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
Truth be told, if there's going to be pushback, it will be from the females. I don't get the sense that guys give a crap where they go or who's watching. It's the females that will, when subjected to the idea of having to share bathrooms with guys, could speak up. Even when I was in college almost every floor was coed (they didn't allow in-room coed yet, not sure if they do now either) and there was always a vote on whether to make the two baths/shower rooms on each floor unisex or boy/girl. It almost always was voted by the girls to have a girls only bathroom and in the rare cases the vote went all unisex, the griping from the females was significant. Seeing how the three boys I have now use their bathroom, it's clear to me that the next generation of males isn't going to be any better taking care of business in the bathroom than the hordes of males that came before them. :ohno:
Hey, Carlin forgot to mention that men are bowl challenged. :thumb:
Watch, the next movement (no pun intended) will be to force men to sit down when they pee. That's when the revolution begins!!!! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14681
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by Skjellyfetti »

GannonFan wrote:Truth be told, if there's going to be pushback, it will be from the females. I don't get the sense that guys give a crap where they go or who's watching. It's the females that will, when subjected to the idea of having to share bathrooms with guys, could speak up.
so far the outcry seems reserved for middle aged dudes dropping their kid off at college
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by Ibanez »

GannonFan wrote:
Cluck U wrote:
Hey, Carlin forgot to mention that men are bowl challenged. :thumb:
Watch, the next movement (no pun intended) will be to force men to sit down when they pee. That's when the revolution begins!!!! :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
http://www.mensfitness.com/blogs/could- ... r-sex-life
Medical research reported in Sweden’s Folket newspaper said that sitting might mean reduced prostate cancer risk and be better for you in the bedroom. That’s because the bladder empties more efficiently when men take a seat while urinating, and this improved bladder release supposedly decreases prostate problems and allows for a longer and healthier sex life.
When I worked with the USMC, I met a General who advocated sitting down to pee and took pride in spreading the word about it. :lol:
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by 89Hen »

DADT
Image
User avatar
andy7171
Firefly
Firefly
Posts: 27951
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:12 am
I am a fan of: Wiping.
A.K.A.: HE HATE ME
Location: Eastern Palouse

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by andy7171 »

Let's just call it the Head. Chicks will love it.
"Elaine, you're from Baltimore, right?"
"Yes, well, Towson actually."
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by GannonFan »

Skjellyfetti wrote:
GannonFan wrote:Truth be told, if there's going to be pushback, it will be from the females. I don't get the sense that guys give a crap where they go or who's watching. It's the females that will, when subjected to the idea of having to share bathrooms with guys, could speak up.
so far the outcry seems reserved for middle aged dudes dropping their kid off at college
I agree, since it's only at colleges so far where this has really been close to fully implemented. It's funny, I asked my wife if her elementary school has implemented the executive mandate to provide gender neutral bathrooms at her school (a k-4 school) and apparently it hasn't been discussed at all. And that's a place where sometimes, literally, the s**t does hit the fan, mostly in the boys room of course. :thumb:
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by 89Hen »

Skjellyfetti wrote:
GannonFan wrote:Truth be told, if there's going to be pushback, it will be from the females. I don't get the sense that guys give a crap where they go or who's watching. It's the females that will, when subjected to the idea of having to share bathrooms with guys, could speak up.
so far the outcry seems reserved for middle aged dudes dropping their kid off at college
Can you tell my why we need gender neutral bathrooms?
Image
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14681
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by Skjellyfetti »

89Hen wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:
so far the outcry seems reserved for middle aged dudes dropping their kid off at college
Can you tell my why we need gender neutral bathrooms?
Well, first of all... I don't really care. As long as it's somewhat clean, it flushes, and there is ample toilet paper... I haven't encountered a situation that's caused me to give a (metaphorical) shit.

But, I already answered your question in my first response. It's not about social justice warrior reasons... but, just convenience. It sucks to wander the labyrinthine halls of a university building (or similar) only to find the wrong fucking bathroom and then having to wander around again to find the correct one. Nice to be able to just use the first one you encounter. :thumb:
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
User avatar
89Hen
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 39283
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:13 pm
I am a fan of: High Horses
A.K.A.: The Almighty Arbiter

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by 89Hen »

Skjellyfetti wrote:
89Hen wrote: Can you tell my why we need gender neutral bathrooms?
Well, first of all... I don't really care. As long as it's somewhat clean, it flushes, and there is ample toilet paper... I haven't encountered a situation that's caused me to give a (metaphorical) shit.

But, I already answered your question in my first response. It's not about social justice warrior reasons... but, just convenience. It sucks to wander the labyrinthine halls of a university building (or similar) only to find the wrong fucking bathroom and then having to wander around again to find the correct one. Nice to be able to just use the first one you encounter. :thumb:
Not the reason for the ones I encountered yesterday. They were side by side. You could stand in one spot and see both signs. No hunting required. Can you think of another reason then?
Image
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14681
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by Skjellyfetti »

In that case, I'll just go with the "I don't really care" one.

I'm sorry you didn't find your safe space and had to deal with this microaggression.
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
User avatar
Pwns
Level4
Level4
Posts: 7344
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 10:38 pm
I am a fan of: Georgia Friggin' Southern
A.K.A.: FCS_pwns_FBS (AGS)

Re: Univ. of Chicago: No 'Safe Spaces'

Post by Pwns »

Skjellyfetti wrote:
89Hen wrote: Can you tell my why we need gender neutral bathrooms?
Well, first of all... I don't really care. As long as it's somewhat clean, it flushes, and there is ample toilet paper... I haven't encountered a situation that's caused me to give a (metaphorical) shit.

But, I already answered your question in my first response. It's not about social justice warrior reasons... but, just convenience. It sucks to wander the labyrinthine halls of a university building (or similar) only to find the wrong fucking bathroom and then having to wander around again to find the correct one. Nice to be able to just use the first one you encounter. :thumb:
Solution: Make 2/3s of the restrooms into restrooms that anyone can go in...the other 1/3rd are for ostensibly-female people only. :nod:
Celebrate Diversity.*
*of appearance only. Restrictions apply.
Post Reply