You're not a problem whatsoever. You have been the entertainment.89Hen wrote:Ibanez wrote: Satire or not, you're the problem.How so Chant?
'Taking someone's quotes out of context??? The nerve'!!!!

You're not a problem whatsoever. You have been the entertainment.89Hen wrote:Ibanez wrote: Satire or not, you're the problem.How so Chant?

So you agree that Jelly was just being funny.kalm wrote:You're not a problem whatsoever. You have been the entertainment.89Hen wrote:How so Chant?
'Taking someone's quotes out of context??? The nerve'!!!!


In applying your own tactics against you? Yes.89Hen wrote:So you agree that Jelly was just being funny.kalm wrote:
You're not a problem whatsoever. You have been the entertainment.
'Taking someone's quotes out of context??? The nerve'!!!!

If he was trolling, then he got me. But I'm pretty sure you took his bait more than I did, as did Sticky. You actually thought he had a gotcha moment. It was a good humor post.kalm wrote:In applying your own tactics against you? Yes.89Hen wrote: So you agree that Jelly was just being funny.
I'm just not sure if you're playing dumb and masterfully trolling...


It WAS a gotcha moment. Because 1) you're at least as partisan as the rest, and 2) you are known for taking a select few words out of context and using them against someone.89Hen wrote:If he was trolling, then he got me. But I'm pretty sure you took his bait more than I did, as did Sticky. You actually thought he had a gotcha moment. It was a good humor post.kalm wrote:
In applying your own tactics against you? Yes.
I'm just not sure if you're playing dumb and masterfully trolling...

God I hope you're trolling me. One, compared to some, sure, but not compared to the likes of jelly, hound, aho, bdk, AG1, hell even Cleetsus. Two, I do edit quotes down the important part to be succinct, but if I ever take them out of context it's done to troll. Again, I'm not 100% sure that was what jelly was going for. If he was trolling, then he got me, but got you far worse.kalm wrote:It WAS a gotcha moment. Because 1) you're at least as partisan as the rest, and 2) you are known for taking a select few words out of context and using them against someone.89Hen wrote: If he was trolling, then he got me. But I'm pretty sure you took his bait more than I did, as did Sticky. You actually thought he had a gotcha moment. It was a good humor post.
God I hope you're trolling me and not unaware that you do #2 ...




Did you have to train to backpedal like that?89Hen wrote:If he was trolling, then he got me. But I'm pretty sure you took his bait more than I did, as did Sticky. You actually thought he had a gotcha moment. It was a good humor post.kalm wrote:
In applying your own tactics against you? Yes.
I'm just not sure if you're playing dumb and masterfully trolling...

Admitting that if he was trolling that he got me is backpedalling?Ibanez wrote:Did you have to train to backpedal like that?89Hen wrote: If he was trolling, then he got me. But I'm pretty sure you took his bait more than I did, as did Sticky. You actually thought he had a gotcha moment. It was a good humor post.

So, like 5 years?89Hen wrote:Admitting that if he was trolling that he got me is backpedalling?Ibanez wrote: Did you have to train to backpedal like that?
You said89Hen wrote:Ibanez wrote: Satire or not, you're the problem.How so Chant?
Then when posts of yours from the past come up with that in there, you claim it's satire. By your definition, you're the problem."Posters here who end or begin posts withdonks or
conks are what's wrong with this divided country right now."
89 is more mature and above the fray than anyone here.Skjellyfetti wrote:It was trolling your "holier-than-thou" attitude... like you are somehow above the fray.
SDHornet... who laughs at both sides pretty fucking equally... simply laughed at Conks and you got all offended.

I do believe I'm less partisan than a lot of folks on the poli board and even if you were trolling or joking, the fact that you came up with three examples that were obvious satire, one dating back to 2012, kinda supports that Jelly. I know you probably didn't spend a lot of time doing it, but if you did, you'd be hard pressed to find anything better than what you did.Skjellyfetti wrote:It was trolling your "holier-than-thou" attitude... like you are somehow above the fray.
SDHornet... who laughs at both sides pretty fucking equally... simply laughed at Conks and you got all offended.


You should actually click on the links that jelly provided and read the posts. He knew those were phony examples, but you took the bait more than I did.Ibanez wrote:You said89Hen wrote:How so Chant?
Then when posts of yours from the past come up with that in there, you claim it's satire. By your definition, you're the problem."Posters here who end or begin posts withdonks or
conks are what's wrong with this divided country right now."
When being trolled, you either 1) fall for it; or 2) go along with it.![]()
Or is everything you post just satire?


It may help you.Ibanez wrote:89 is more mature and above the fray than anyone here.Skjellyfetti wrote:It was trolling your "holier-than-thou" attitude... like you are somehow above the fray.
SDHornet... who laughs at both sides pretty fucking equally... simply laughed at Conks and you got all offended.We should all take notes.



It's why I need a break from the poli board. It's dragged me down to your level.Aho Old Guy wrote:Mr HATE! whining about hate?
The irony is delicious.




No hate here...I love all you miserable bastards!89Hen wrote:I do believe I'm less partisan than a lot of folks on the poli board and even if you were trolling or joking, the fact that you came up with three examples that were obvious satire, one dating back to 2012, kinda supports that Jelly. I know you probably didn't spend a lot of time doing it, but if you did, you'd be hard pressed to find anything better than what you did.Skjellyfetti wrote:It was trolling your "holier-than-thou" attitude... like you are somehow above the fray.
SDHornet... who laughs at both sides pretty fucking equally... simply laughed at Conks and you got all offended.
We have plenty of level headed guys on the poli board but I'm just so tired of all the mud slinging and hate from both sides (talking big picture, not just here), I'm thinking of retiring from the poli board for a while. Life is too short for this much hate.

I'm just really worried about 93 and it's making me grumpier than normal.kalm wrote:No hate here...I love all you miserable bastards!89Hen wrote: I do believe I'm less partisan than a lot of folks on the poli board and even if you were trolling or joking, the fact that you came up with three examples that were obvious satire, one dating back to 2012, kinda supports that Jelly. I know you probably didn't spend a lot of time doing it, but if you did, you'd be hard pressed to find anything better than what you did.
We have plenty of level headed guys on the poli board but I'm just so tired of all the mud slinging and hate from both sides (talking big picture, not just here), I'm thinking of retiring from the poli board for a while. Life is too short for this much hate.


You forgot to say no homo. Unless you didn't forget, then nevermind. And there's nothing wrong with that.kalm wrote:No hate here...I love all you miserable bastards!89Hen wrote: I do believe I'm less partisan than a lot of folks on the poli board and even if you were trolling or joking, the fact that you came up with three examples that were obvious satire, one dating back to 2012, kinda supports that Jelly. I know you probably didn't spend a lot of time doing it, but if you did, you'd be hard pressed to find anything better than what you did.
We have plenty of level headed guys on the poli board but I'm just so tired of all the mud slinging and hate from both sides (talking big picture, not just here), I'm thinking of retiring from the poli board for a while. Life is too short for this much hate.
No, i prefer to take it out of context.89Hen wrote:You should actually click on the links that jelly provided and read the posts. He knew those were phony examples, but you took the bait more than I did.Ibanez wrote:
You said
Then when posts of yours from the past come up with that in there, you claim it's satire. By your definition, you're the problem.
When being trolled, you either 1) fall for it; or 2) go along with it.![]()
Or is everything you post just satire?
89Hen wrote:We have plenty of level headed guys on the poli board but I'm just so tired of all the mud slinging and hate from both sides (talking big picture, not just here), I'm thinking of retiring from the poli board for a while. Life is too short for this much hate.Skjellyfetti wrote:It was trolling your "holier-than-thou" attitude... like you are somehow above the fray.
SDHornet... who laughs at both sides pretty fucking equally... simply laughed at Conks and you got all offended.

Maybe not vast, but it sure feels like I'm surrounded by it. Of course you have to keep in mind that I live in a VERY blue county. The county officials have done things since the election that I've never seen before in my life. Staging a rally using Hillary logos to protest Trump... on the County's dime. They just did this...Ibanez wrote:The extremes right and left flanks, IMO, were louder and more hateful in 2016 and do not reflect the vast majority of people. Again, my opinion.
I've never seen an act like this before. Sure, it's a meaningless resolution, but why are they wasting time doing this?? It seems to me like more people are being sucked in than ever, not just that the extremes are louder.All nine members of the Montgomery County Council, who all are Democrats, voted Tuesday to pass a resolution "to condemn President Trump's federal budget proposal and to urge the United States Congress to reject it on behalf of Montgomery County residents."
