Chemtrails, moon landing, federal reserve, Vince Foster, Obama's birth certificate........ its all around you man, open your eyes....kalm wrote:For example?CitadelGrad wrote:
Nope. There's a lot of stuff in there that is simply untrue or grossly distorted.
At giving each other substance-free -- on second thought, content-free-- profanity-laced reacharounds.D1B wrote:Houndawg, you and I are the best ever.houndawg wrote:
Bunch of simps without tman. Only one of them that had any gumption.
csConks.
Seriously, I haven't been following this so I would honestly like to know what is wrong with his video.CitadelGrad wrote:Nope. There's a lot of stuff in there that is simply untrue or grossly distorted.kalm wrote:I'll betcha even the Citadel boys will be nodding in agreement.
Huh? When have I ever said anything good about Trump? Heck, I made the mistake, like many others, of saying he would be out of the campaign after a month since he was such a nothing candidate.D1B wrote:Not as entertaining as you, Baldy and GonorrheaFan fellating TRUMP.AZGrizFan wrote:
Watching you guys line up to suck Hildabeast's cock makes it all worth it.
Major poonhound.GannonFan wrote:Huh? When have I ever said anything good about Trump? Heck, I made the mistake, like many others, of saying he would be out of the campaign after a month since he was such a nothing candidate.D1B wrote:
Not as entertaining as you, Baldy and GonorrheaFan fellating TRUMP.
You could be confused by my comparing him to Berlusconi. Of course, since you probably have no idea who that guy was/is, since you know very little in life, you might be mistaken into thinking it was a comparison to be postitive of Trump. If you did know Berlusconi, you would realize that the comparison is not a flattering one for Trump, or frankly, for our electorate.
Lesson over, you can go back to be as ignorant of reality as you were before.
Indeed, he puts Cappy to shame with the quantity of what he chased and probably is still chasing.houndawg wrote:Major poonhound.GannonFan wrote:
Huh? When have I ever said anything good about Trump? Heck, I made the mistake, like many others, of saying he would be out of the campaign after a month since he was such a nothing candidate.
You could be confused by my comparing him to Berlusconi. Of course, since you probably have no idea who that guy was/is, since you know very little in life, you might be mistaken into thinking it was a comparison to be postitive of Trump. If you did know Berlusconi, you would realize that the comparison is not a flattering one for Trump, or frankly, for our electorate.
Lesson over, you can go back to be as ignorant of reality as you were before.
Clam up Gynofan. Trump is a conk, therefore Trump is your man.GannonFan wrote:Huh? When have I ever said anything good about Trump? Heck, I made the mistake, like many others, of saying he would be out of the campaign after a month since he was such a nothing candidate.D1B wrote:
Not as entertaining as you, Baldy and GonorrheaFan fellating TRUMP.
You could be confused by my comparing him to Berlusconi. Of course, since you probably have no idea who that guy was/is, since you know very little in life, you might be mistaken into thinking it was a comparison to be postitive of Trump. If you did know Berlusconi, you would realize that the comparison is not a flattering one for Trump, or frankly, for our electorate.
Lesson over, you can go back to be as ignorant of reality as you were before.
I voted Obama in 2008, was he my conk then?D1B wrote:Clam up Gynofan. Trump is a conk, therefore Trump is your man.GannonFan wrote:
Huh? When have I ever said anything good about Trump? Heck, I made the mistake, like many others, of saying he would be out of the campaign after a month since he was such a nothing candidate.
You could be confused by my comparing him to Berlusconi. Of course, since you probably have no idea who that guy was/is, since you know very little in life, you might be mistaken into thinking it was a comparison to be postitive of Trump. If you did know Berlusconi, you would realize that the comparison is not a flattering one for Trump, or frankly, for our electorate.
Lesson over, you can go back to be as ignorant of reality as you were before.
Funny, and typical, a catholic supporting a party with a platform of marginalizing the poor.
Good luck with your supply side Jesus.
Just out of curiosity, list the issues you are liberal on.GannonFan wrote:I voted Obama in 2008, was he my conk then?D1B wrote:
Clam up Gynofan. Trump is a conk, therefore Trump is your man.
Funny, and typical, a catholic supporting a party with a platform of marginalizing the poor.
Good luck with your supply side Jesus.
LeadBolt wrote:Under Obama and the Democrats, the middle class has lost purchasing power while the 1% has gained more wealth. Perhaps we should pay more attention to the party's records than their rhetoric.
I don't know, but I know one thing: Our tax code dis-incentivizes making more money. The more you make, the more tax breaks disappear. Can't claim losses on my rental property. No longer can claim personal deductions for kids/wife. I'm sure if I were uber rich I wouldn't have these problems, but for those of us NOT uber rich, we're getting screwed.kalm wrote:LeadBolt wrote:Under Obama and the Democrats, the middle class has lost purchasing power while the 1% has gained more wealth. Perhaps we should pay more attention to the party's records than their rhetoric.
How would Republican policies have changed this?
(Serious question)
AZGrizFan wrote:I don't know, but I know one thing: Our tax code dis-incentivizes making more money. The more you make, the more tax breaks disappear. Can't claim losses on my rental property. No longer can claim personal deductions for kids/wife. I'm sure if I were uber rich I wouldn't have these problems, but for those of us NOT uber rich, we're getting screwed.kalm wrote:
How would Republican policies have changed this?
(Serious question)
The things you mentioned started happening long before Obama, under both conk and donk administrations...LeadBolt wrote:Under Obama and the Democrats, the middle class has lost purchasing power while the 1% has gained more wealth. Perhaps we should pay more attention to the party's records than their rhetoric.
Vidav wrote:Seriously, I haven't been following this so I would honestly like to know what is wrong with his video.CitadelGrad wrote:
Nope. There's a lot of stuff in there that is simply untrue or grossly distorted.
Sure,kalm wrote:Just out of curiosity, list the issues you are liberal on.GannonFan wrote:
I voted Obama in 2008, was he my conk then?
This is confusing. Are you in favor of public school teacher unionizing along with other professions or just in favor of public school teachers unionizing but not other professions?GannonFan wrote:I'm in favor of unions for public school teachers
What's an example of this?GannonFan wrote:Just as conservatives have mainly been responsible for going way too far to the right on social issues, liberals have mirrored them in economic issues by shifting way too far to the left.
I have no issue with the concept that anyone have the ability to unionize. I think it's advantageous for public school teachers to do so, and I support that. For other professions, in this day and age, I think it's less advantageous, but I don't think it's clear cut enough to have a blanket statement that people should or shouldn't unionize.Skjellyfetti wrote:This is confusing. Are you in favor of public school teacher unionizing along with other professions or just in favor of public school teachers unionizing but not other professions?GannonFan wrote:I'm in favor of unions for public school teachers
What's an example of this?GannonFan wrote:Just as conservatives have mainly been responsible for going way too far to the right on social issues, liberals have mirrored them in economic issues by shifting way too far to the left.
What is the biggest "far left" economic initiative implemented in the past decade? Obamacare?
I think we should simply use our market advantages as a hammer that benefits the entire country. Put that in your "economic conservative" pipe and smoke it!GannonFan wrote:I have no issue with the concept that anyone have the ability to unionize. I think it's advantageous for public school teachers to do so, and I support that. For other professions, in this day and age, I think it's less advantageous, but I don't think it's clear cut enough to have a blanket statement that people should or shouldn't unionize.Skjellyfetti wrote:
This is confusing. Are you in favor of public school teacher unionizing along with other professions or just in favor of public school teachers unionizing but not other professions?
What's an example of this?
What is the biggest "far left" economic initiative implemented in the past decade? Obamacare?
I think the far left has lost their way in terms of trade. Their aversion to free trade and overall globalization is akin to an ostrich putting their head in the ground. Economic isolationism, which some are pushing, is just non-sensical. It's like when I tease kalmie about his love for the Hawley-Smoot tariff and economic nostalgia like that. I actually don't even consider Obamacare to be an economic initiative. I don't care for the way Obamacare was crafted nor the way it was passed, but I'm generally in favor of government providing the means for everyone to get at least basic health care coverage.
Super idea. Now the details, how exactly do we do that?kalm wrote:I think we should simply use our market advantages as a hammer that benefits the entire country. Put that in your "economic conservative" pipe and smoke it!GannonFan wrote:
I have no issue with the concept that anyone have the ability to unionize. I think it's advantageous for public school teachers to do so, and I support that. For other professions, in this day and age, I think it's less advantageous, but I don't think it's clear cut enough to have a blanket statement that people should or shouldn't unionize.
I think the far left has lost their way in terms of trade. Their aversion to free trade and overall globalization is akin to an ostrich putting their head in the ground. Economic isolationism, which some are pushing, is just non-sensical. It's like when I tease kalmie about his love for the Hawley-Smoot tariff and economic nostalgia like that. I actually don't even consider Obamacare to be an economic initiative. I don't care for the way Obamacare was crafted nor the way it was passed, but I'm generally in favor of government providing the means for everyone to get at least basic health care coverage.
To libs, anybody to the right of Lenin is considered a conservative.GannonFan wrote:I think you would try to classify me more conservative on economic issues (I'm all for free trade for instance) but frankly, I think I'm middle of the road when it comes to economics, it's the whacko shift to the far left by liberals that makes me look relatively conservative.
Eisenhower.AZGrizFan wrote:To libs, anybody to the right of Lenin is considered a conservative.GannonFan wrote:I think you would try to classify me more conservative on economic issues (I'm all for free trade for instance) but frankly, I think I'm middle of the road when it comes to economics, it's the whacko shift to the far left by liberals that makes me look relatively conservative.
Reward companies and countries who are good actors.GannonFan wrote:Super idea. Now the details, how exactly do we do that?kalm wrote:
I think we should simply use our market advantages as a hammer that benefits the entire country. Put that in your "economic conservative" pipe and smoke it!
I asked for details, not soundbites or platitudes.kalm wrote:Reward companies and countries who are good actors.GannonFan wrote:
Super idea. Now the details, how exactly do we do that?
I'm the visionary big picture guy here. I delegate the details to people like you.GannonFan wrote:I asked for details, not soundbites or platitudes.kalm wrote:
Reward companies and countries who are good actors.
