UNI88 wrote:CID1990 wrote:I would agree that Christianity is #2
but there's a LOT of daylight between there an #1
think the Patriots and a Pop Warner team
Completely agree. I would put Judaism at #3. I'm not sure how to rank Hinduism, Zoroastrianism, Shintoism, etc. Buddhism as mentioned earlier is pretty benign.
Christianity has its nutballs that make you scratch your head and also had the Inquisition. Fortunately it has evolved beyond that. I don't know if Islam can evolve like Christianity has done but I also don't think Christ would advocate for genocide as the solution. Helping those in need is generally a good thing but blindly allowing thousands of Syrians and other refugees to migrate without attempting to screen out radicals and having a plan to handle and assimilate the remainder is pretty stupid.
the problem with vetting these refugees is that you just can't
when people are applying for visas there are a number of documents and evidence of relationships, etc that they can bring with them- even the most basic identity documents are helpful
in the case of these refugees, many of them literally have nothing. For the legitimate refugees, this is a hindrance for them. For imbedded terrorists, it is their ticket in- no identity, no record, no nothing. The people vetting these cats won't know their real names, nationalities, nothing.
The bottom line is that we accept middle eastern refugees we have to accept the fact that we are admitting the murder monkeys with them. so it really comes down to a choice: does our humanitarian spirit trump our desire for absolute safety, or vice versa?