Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Political discussions
User avatar
Skjellyfetti
Anal
Anal
Posts: 14681
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:56 pm
I am a fan of: Appalachian

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by Skjellyfetti »

CitadelGrad wrote:Also, the matter of secession was briefly debated at the constitutional convention. When it became clear that no state would ratify the Constitution if it could not withdraw from the Union at some point, the delegates decided to omit any prohibition against secession.

Link?

I think you're confusing the Constitutional Convention and the Continental Congress that drafted the Articles of Confederation.

The Articles of Confederation were originally titled "Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union" - that was dropped to leave open the door for secession as you stated.

I've never heard of any debate at the Constitutional Convention about secession. But, if there was, I'd be happy to take a look - that would certainly change my views on the legality of secession. :thumb:
"The unmasking thing was all created by Devin Nunes"
- Richard Burr, (R-NC)
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by Ibanez »

CitadelGrad wrote:
GannonFan wrote:
Secession was never a legal right and no reading of the Constitutional convention nor the debates that happened after that would imply that. Even Madison walked back his arguing in the Virginia Resolutions after realizing the extrapolations that he wrought and Jefferson's contribution to the principle of secession was always considered to be of a revolutionary spirit other than a legal one (our Revolution was illegal, per se, for example). Jackson's interpretation (and precedent does account for things) was that there was no Union if states could leave at will or ignore laws at will and that there wouldn't have been a Union or Constitution in the first place if those things were permissible or a "right".

As for the shots fired, well, there wasn't any real immediate danger from Fort Sumter staying in Union hands so there was no "force" that required the South to fire (assuming Fort Sumter itself was the initial "first" shot). And of course, there was no Northern military action that caused South Carolina and the rest of the South to secede in the first place, just simply the result of a Presidential election of a person whom the South didn't want. Just as the war doesn't happen without slavery, the war doesn't happen, obviously, if the South hadn't then, as a result of slavery, seceded.
Of course secession was a right. The 10th Amendment makes that clear. Also, the matter of secession was briefly debated at the constitutional convention. When it became clear that no state would ratify the Constitution if it could not withdraw from the Union at some point, the delegates decided to omit any prohibition against secession.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
That's a weak argument.
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
OL FU
Level3
Level3
Posts: 4336
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:25 pm
I am a fan of: Furman
Location: Greenville SC

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by OL FU »

Ibanez wrote:
CitadelGrad wrote:
Of course secession was a right. The 10th Amendment makes that clear. Also, the matter of secession was briefly debated at the constitutional convention. When it became clear that no state would ratify the Constitution if it could not withdraw from the Union at some point, the delegates decided to omit any prohibition against secession.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
That's a weak argument.
I'm not certain that it was debated at the convention, but it was certainly debated by the states. My recollection is that both Virginia and New York believed they had secured the right to secession (but it is just recollection).

Certainly they wouldn't put a provision for secession in the constitution thus deeming its failure before it even started. And certainly they wouldn't have stated that secession isn't permissible for exactly the same reason.
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by CAA Flagship »

93henfan wrote:Tubman it is, according to CNN.

Let's go ahead and put women and minorities on everything now just to get the attack on white men over with. We already sent the message to my generation's white men that we are evil. Maybe spare my sons' generation. :twocents:
So what is Tubman famous for? Is she the person on the pancake syrup bottle?
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by 93henfan »

CAA Flagship wrote:
93henfan wrote:Tubman it is, according to CNN.

Let's go ahead and put women and minorities on everything now just to get the attack on white men over with. We already sent the message to my generation's white men that we are evil. Maybe spare my sons' generation. :twocents:
So what is Tubman famous for? Is she the person on the pancake syrup bottle?
You're thinking of Aunt Jemima!

Harriet Tubman invented the rail system for coal miners that they use underground.
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by GannonFan »

CAA Flagship wrote:
93henfan wrote:Tubman it is, according to CNN.

Let's go ahead and put women and minorities on everything now just to get the attack on white men over with. We already sent the message to my generation's white men that we are evil. Maybe spare my sons' generation. :twocents:
So what is Tubman famous for? Is she the person on the pancake syrup bottle?
Escaped slave, Underground Railroad Conductor, a scout as well as a nurse for the Union during the Civil War, and a leading suffragist for the women's vote in her later years. Not too shabby considering the role women were kept in in her day.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by CAA Flagship »

93henfan wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: So what is Tubman famous for? Is she the person on the pancake syrup bottle?
You're thinking of Aunt Jemima!

Harriet Tubman invented the rail system for coal miners that they use underground.
Oh snap.

I got confused because they look alike.

ImageImage
YoUDeeMan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 12088
Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 8:48 am
I am a fan of: Fleecing the Stupid
A.K.A.: Delaware Homie

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by YoUDeeMan »

93henfan wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: So what is Tubman famous for? Is she the person on the pancake syrup bottle?
You're thinking of Aunt Jemima!

Harriet Tubman invented the rail system for coal miners that they use underground.
Of course, that led to the discovery of Black Lung...she she gets credit for that, too.
These signatures have a 500 character limit?

What if I have more personalities than that?
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by CAA Flagship »

Cluck U wrote:
93henfan wrote:
You're thinking of Aunt Jemima!

Harriet Tubman invented the rail system for coal miners that they use underground.
Of course, that led to the discovery of Black Lung...she she gets credit for that, too.
:nod: #BlackLungsMatter
bandl
Towson
Towson
Posts: 18498
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:30 pm

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by bandl »

CAA Flagship wrote:
93henfan wrote:Tubman it is, according to CNN.

Let's go ahead and put women and minorities on everything now just to get the attack on white men over with. We already sent the message to my generation's white men that we are evil. Maybe spare my sons' generation. :twocents:
So what is Tubman famous for? Is she the person on the pancake syrup bottle?
I think she was the maid in 'Billy Madison'

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWoIfaViyhc[/youtube]
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by CAA Flagship »

bandl wrote:
CAA Flagship wrote: So what is Tubman famous for? Is she the person on the pancake syrup bottle?
I think she was the maid in 'Billy Madison'

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWoIfaViyhc[/youtube]
No. You are thinking about Sweet Brown

Image
User avatar
BDKJMU
Level5
Level5
Posts: 36345
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:59 am
I am a fan of: JMU
A.K.A.: BDKJMU
Location: Philly Burbs

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by BDKJMU »

So what would be wrong with just leaving the bills as they are?
JMU Football:
4 Years FBS: 40-11 (.784). Highest winning percentage & least losses of all of G5 2022-2025.
Sun Belt East Champions: 2022, 2023, 2025
Sun Belt Champions: 2025
Top 25 ranked: 2022, 2023, 2025
CFP: 2025
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by CAA Flagship »

BDKJMU wrote:So what would be wrong with just leaving the bills as they are?
Why do you hate Weezy?

Image
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by GannonFan »

BDKJMU wrote:So what would be wrong with just leaving the bills as they are?
They update the bills every so often now anyway due to anti-counterfitting so they'll be worked on regardless if they didn't change the pictures. And there's certainly nothing wrong with change (ha!, no pun intended) as there are a whole bunch of dead, old, White guys on the bills now. There's a law that living people can't be on money so might as well find some dead old, non-white people to change things up a bit. There's only 7 bill denominations in circulation anymore so might as well pick one and start from there.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
User avatar
93henfan
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 56358
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 9:03 pm
Location: Slower Delaware

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by 93henfan »

BDKJMU wrote:So what would be wrong with just leaving the bills as they are?
How can you continue putting evil white men on money? We are trying to marginalize white men in this society. Hello! :dunce:
Delaware Football: 1889-2012; 2022-
User avatar
CitadelGrad
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5210
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
A.K.A.: El Cid
Location: St. Louis

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by CitadelGrad »

Skjellyfetti wrote:
CitadelGrad wrote:Also, the matter of secession was briefly debated at the constitutional convention. When it became clear that no state would ratify the Constitution if it could not withdraw from the Union at some point, the delegates decided to omit any prohibition against secession.

Link?

I think you're confusing the Constitutional Convention and the Continental Congress that drafted the Articles of Confederation.

The Articles of Confederation were originally titled "Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union" - that was dropped to leave open the door for secession as you stated.

I've never heard of any debate at the Constitutional Convention about secession. But, if there was, I'd be happy to take a look - that would certainly change my views on the legality of secession. :thumb:
No, you fucking idiot. I know what I'm talking about.

Read a fucking book.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

Image
User avatar
EWURanger
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 4712
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 1:06 pm
I am a fan of: Eastern Washington

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by EWURanger »

This whole thing...yes, the recognition is cool.

But at the end of the day, it's just another silly example of people continuing to confuse symbology with any kind of meaningful change.
Image
User avatar
GannonFan
Level5
Level5
Posts: 19233
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2007 6:51 am
I am a fan of: Delaware
A.K.A.: Non-Partisan Hack

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by GannonFan »

CitadelGrad wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:

Link?

I think you're confusing the Constitutional Convention and the Continental Congress that drafted the Articles of Confederation.

The Articles of Confederation were originally titled "Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union" - that was dropped to leave open the door for secession as you stated.

I've never heard of any debate at the Constitutional Convention about secession. But, if there was, I'd be happy to take a look - that would certainly change my views on the legality of secession. :thumb:
No, you **** idiot. I know what I'm talking about.

Read a **** book.
So the whole basis you have to support you position is a lot of bluster and the 10th amendment? How about the part in Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution? How about the Supremacy Clause in Article VI? Heck, at least something that was talked about was that the Preamble actually said "We the People", and not "We the States", and even the likes of Patrick Henry realized the distinction that made this a permanent union. What books are you talking about, let's have evidence.
Proud Member of the Blue Hen Nation
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by CAA Flagship »

EWURanger wrote:This whole thing...yes, the recognition is cool.

But at the end of the day, it's just another silly example of people continuing to confuse symbology with any kind of meaningful change.
This X1000.

Like red turf. :kisswink:
CAA Flagship
4th&29
4th&29
Posts: 38529
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 5:01 pm
I am a fan of: Old Dominion
A.K.A.: He/His/Him/Himself
Location: Pizza Hell

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by CAA Flagship »

GannonFan wrote:
CitadelGrad wrote:
No, you **** idiot. I know what I'm talking about.

Read a **** book.
So the whole basis you have to support you position is a lot of bluster and the 10th amendment? How about the part in Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution? How about the Supremacy Clause in Article VI? Heck, at least something that was talked about was that the Preamble actually said "We the People", and not "We the States", and even the likes of Patrick Henry realized the distinction that made this a permanent union. What books are you talking about, let's have evidence.
How about the Sanity Clause? Or maybe you don't believe in Sanity Clause?
User avatar
CitadelGrad
Level4
Level4
Posts: 5210
Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2007 5:19 pm
I am a fan of: Jack Kerouac
A.K.A.: El Cid
Location: St. Louis

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by CitadelGrad »

GannonFan wrote:
CitadelGrad wrote:
No, you **** idiot. I know what I'm talking about.

Read a **** book.
So the whole basis you have to support you position is a lot of bluster and the 10th amendment? How about the part in Article 1 Section 10 of the Constitution? How about the Supremacy Clause in Article VI? Heck, at least something that was talked about was that the Preamble actually said "We the People", and not "We the States", and even the likes of Patrick Henry realized the distinction that made this a permanent union. What books are you talking about, let's have evidence.
Article 1, Section 10 prevents states from entering into treaties or confederations with foreign powers. The Southern states seceded from the United States and therefore were themselves a foreign power. This article in no way prohibits secession.

The Supremacy Clause establishes federal supremacy when state law conflict with federal laws. It does not prohibit secession.

Again, the United States Constitution, as it appeared in 1860, did not prohibit secession. The 10th Amendment clearly states that powers not reserved to the federal government are powers that may be exercised by the people and the states. Since the federal government did not reserve the power to compel states to remain in the Union against their will, the power of secession was a prerogative of the states.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

- Thomas Jefferson, in letter to William S. Smith, 1787

Image
Vidav
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 10804
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm
I am a fan of: Montana
A.K.A.: The Russian
Location: Missoula, MT

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by Vidav »

The good news is we can debate about the war all day but what really matters is the traitors lost and the country remained whole.
Ibanez
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 60519
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:16 pm
I am a fan of: Coastal Carolina

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by Ibanez »

CitadelGrad wrote:
Skjellyfetti wrote:

Link?

I think you're confusing the Constitutional Convention and the Continental Congress that drafted the Articles of Confederation.

The Articles of Confederation were originally titled "Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union" - that was dropped to leave open the door for secession as you stated.

I've never heard of any debate at the Constitutional Convention about secession. But, if there was, I'd be happy to take a look - that would certainly change my views on the legality of secession. :thumb:
No, you fucking idiot. I know what I'm talking about.

Read a fucking book.
Didn't The Citadel teach you any class?

Or knowledge, for that matter?

I agree with JellyBelly, you are confusing the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution.

James Madison says
Montpellier, Decr 23, 1832.
Dr. Sir I have received yours of the 19th, inclosing some of the South Carolina papers. There are in one of them some interesting views of the doctrine of secession; one that had occurred to me, and which for the first time I have seen in print; namely that if one State can at will withdraw from the others, the others can at will withdraw from her, and turn her, nolentem, volentem, out of the union. Until of late, there is not a State that would have abhorred such a doctrine more than South Carolina, or more dreaded an application of it to herself. The same may be said of the doctrine of nullification, which she now preaches as the only faith by which the Union can be saved.
I partake of the wonder that the men you name should view secession in the light mentioned. The essential difference between a free Government and Governments not free, is that the former is founded in compact, the parties to which are mutually and equally bound by it. Neither of them therefore can have a greater fight to break off from the bargain, than the other or others have to hold them to it......
Turns out I might be a little gay. 89Hen 11/7/17
User avatar
dbackjon
Moderator Team
Moderator Team
Posts: 45627
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 9:20 am
I am a fan of: Northern Arizona
A.K.A.: He/Him
Location: Scottsdale

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by dbackjon »

Vidav wrote:The good news is we can debate about the war all day but what really matters is the traitors lost and the country remained whole.

Yup, and a racist, genocidal Southerner is off the most used bill.






And we have a black President, and will be soon electing a female President.

And, hijab in The Citadel!
:thumb:
Ivytalk
Supporter
Supporter
Posts: 26827
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 6:22 pm
I am a fan of: Salisbury University
Location: Republic of Western Sussex

Re: Hamilton Wins, Jackson Loses

Post by Ivytalk »

dbackjon wrote:
Vidav wrote:The good news is we can debate about the war all day but what really matters is the traitors lost and the country remained whole.

Yup, and a racist, genocidal Southerner is off the most used bill.






And we have a black President, and will be soon electing a female President.

And, hijab in The Citadel!
And we have a guy who needs a new bottle of Midol.
“I’m tired and done.” — 89Hen 3/27/22.
Post Reply